Modeling and coordinating building systems in three dimensions: A case study

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1490-1504

  Tabesh, A Reza ^a   Staub French, Sheryl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

3 D modeling; Building systems; Constructability; Knowledge framework; Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) coordination; Product and process modeling

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRUCTION;

BUILDING SYSTEM COORDINATION KNOWLEDGE; KNOWLEDGE FRAMEWORK;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSTRUCTION; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; DESIGN; SOFTWARE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 34249807025     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/L06-124     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers). 1991. Constructability and constructability programs: White paper. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(1): 67-89.
2. Barton, P.K. 1983. Building services integration. E. & F.N. Spon, London, UK.
3. CII (Construction Industry Institute). 1986. Constructability: a primer. CII, Bureau of Engineering Research, University of Texas at Austin, Tex. Publication 3-1.
4. Fischer, M., and Tatum, C.B. 1997. Characteristics of design-relevant constructability knowledge. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(3): 253-259.
5. Hanlon, E.J., and Sanvido, V.E. 1995. Constructibility information classification scheme. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4): 337-345.
6. Khanzode, A., Fischer, M., and Reed, D. 2005. Case study of the implementation of the Lean Project Delivery System (LPDS) using virtual building technologies on a large healthcare project. In Proceedings of the 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference (IGLC-13), Sydney, Australia, 19-21 July 2005. pp. 143-150.
7. Korman, T.M., and Tatum, C.B. 2001. Development of a knowledge-based system to improve mechanical, electrical, and plumbing coordination. Centre for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. Technical Report No. 129.
8. Korman, T.M., Fischer, M., and Tatum, C.B. 2003. Knowledge and reasoning for MEP coordination. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 129(6): 627-634.
9. Songer, A.D., Diekmann, J., and Al-Rasheed, K. 1998. The impact of 3D visualization on construction planning. In Computing in Civil Engineering, Proceedings of the International Computing Congress, Boston, Mass., 18-21 October 1998. Edited by K.C.P. Wang, T. Adams, M.L. Maher, and A. Songer. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va.
10. Staub-French, S., and Fischer, M. 2001. Industrial case study of electronic design, cost, and schedule integration. Centre for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. Technical Report No. 122.
11. Tatum, C.B. 1988. Classification system for construction technology. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(3): 344-363.
12. Tatum, C.B., and Korman, T.M. 2000. Coordinating building systems: process and knowledge. ASCE Journal of Architectural Engineering, 6(4): 116-121.