Toward a theory of interdisciplinary connections: A classroom study of talk and text

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 368-401

  Nowacek, Rebecca S ^a  

^a MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249795491     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. APPLEBEE, A. N., BURROUGHS, R., & STEVENS, A. S. (2000). Creating continuity and coherence in high school literature curricula. Research in the Teaching of English, 34, 396-429.
2. AUSTIN, I. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
3. BAKHTIN, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. BAKHTIN, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (Vern W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. BARTHOLOMAE, D. (1985). Inventing the university. In M. Rose (Ed.), When a writer can't write (pp. 134-165). New York: Guilford Press.
6. BAYNHAM, M. (2000). Academic writing in new and emergent discipline areas. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 17-31). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
7. BAZERMAN, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8. BECHER, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. England: Milton Keynes; Bristol, PA: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
9. BIZZELL, P. (1982). Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre Text, 3, 213-243.
10. BOIX MANSILLA, V. (2005). Assessing student work at disciplinary crossroads. Change, Jan/Feb, 14-21.
11. BOYER COMMISSION ON EDUCATING UNDERGRADUATES IN THE RESEARCH UNIVERSITY. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America's research universities. Retrieved January 3, 2007, from http://naples.cc.sunysb.edu/Pres/boyer.nsf/
12. BOYER, E. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.
13. BRODKEY, L. (1987). Academic writing as social practice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
14. CARROLL, L. A. (2002). Rehearsing new roles: How college students develop as writers. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
15. FIELD, M., & STOWE, D. (2002). Transforming interdisciplinary teaching and learning through assessment. In C. Haynes (Ed.), Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching (pp. 256-274). Westport, CT: Oryx Press.
16. FRANK, R. (1988)."Interdisciplinary": The first half century. Issues in Integrative Studies, 6, 139-151.
17. FREEDMAN, A. (1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222-251.
18. FULLER, S. (1993). Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge: The coming of science and technology studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
19. GEISLER, C. (1994). Literacy and expertise in the academy. Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 1, 35-57.
20. GREENE, S., & NOWACEK, R. S. (2000). Can writing be taught? Being"explicit" in the teaching and learning of writing across the curriculum. In M. D. Goggin (Ed.), Inventing a discipline: Rhetoric scholarship in honor of Richard E. Young (pp. 334-372). Urbana, IL: NCTE.
21. GROSSMAN, P., WINEBURG, A., & WOOLWORTH, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. Teachers College Record 103, 942-1012.
22. GROSSMAN, P., WINEBURG, S., & BEERS, S. (2000). Introduction: When theory meets practice in the world of school. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 1-16). New York: Teachers College Press.
23. HARVARD UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON THE OBJECTIVES OF A GENERAL EDUCATION IN A FREE SOCIETY. (1945). General education in a free society: Report of the Harvard Committee. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. HAYNES, C. (1996). Interdisciplinary writing and the undergraduate experience: A four-year writing plan proposal. Issues in Integrative Studies, 14, 29-57.
25. HUTCHINS, R. M. (1936). The higher learning in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. JOURNET, D. (1993). Interdisciplinary discourse and "boundary rhetoric": The case of S. E. Jelliffe. Written Communication, 10, 510-541.
27. JOURNET, D. (1995). Synthesizing disciplinary narratives: George Gaylord Simpson's Tempo and mode in evolution. Social Epistemology, 9, 113-150.
28. JOURNET, D. (1999). Writing within (and between) disciplinary genres: 'The adaptive landscape' as a case study in interdisciplinary rhetoric. In T. Kent (Ed.), Post-process theory: New directions for composition research (pp. 96-115). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
29. KLEIN, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
30. KLEIN, J. T., & NEWELL, W. H. (1997). Advancing interdisciplinary studies. In J. Gaff & J. Ratcliff (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, strategies, practices, and change (pp. 393-415). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. KOESTLER, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.
32. LANHAM, R. (1999). Revising prose (4th ed.). NY: Longman.
33. LEANDER, K. M. (2002). Locating Latanya: The situated production of identity artifacts in classroom interaction. Research in the Teaching of English, 37, 198-250.
34. McCARTHY, L. P. (1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21,233-265.
35. MEIKLEJOHN. A. (1932). The experimental college. New York: Harper.
36. MENAND, L. (2001). Undisciplined: The making of the public mind. Wilson Quarterly, 25, 51-59.
37. MESSER-DAVIDOW, E. D., SHUMWAY, D. R., & SYLVAN, D. J. (Eds.). (1993). Knowledges: Historical and critical studies in disciplinarity. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
38. NELSON, J. (1990). This was an easy assignment: Examining how students interpret academic writing tasks. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 362-396.
39. NEWELL, W. H. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1-24.
40. NEWELL, W. H., & GREEN, W. J. (1982). Defining and teaching interdisciplinary studies. Improving college and university teaching, 30, 23-30.
41. NEWTON, R. R. (2000). Tensions and models in general education planning. JGE: The Journal of General Education, 49, 165-181.
42. RATCLIFF, J. L., JOHNSON, D. K., LANASA, S. M., & GAFF, J. G. (2001). The status of general education in the year 2000: Summary of a national survey. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
43. RUSSELL, D. R., & YAÑEZ, A. (2003). "Big picture people rarely become historians": Genre systems and the contradictions of general education. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies. Retrieved January 3, 2007 at http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/russell/22 May 2006
44. SEABURY, M. B. (2002). Writing in interdisciplinary courses: Coaching integrative thinking. In C. Haynes (Ed.), Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching (pp. 38-64). Westport, CT: Oryx Press.
45. SEARLE, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
46. SILL, D. J. (1996). Integrative thinking, synthesis, and creativity in interdisciplinary studies. JGE: The Journal of Education, 45, 129-151.
47. STERNGLASS, M. S. (1997). Time to know them: A longitudinal study of writing and learning at the college level. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. WINEBURG, S., & GROSSMAN, P. (2000). Scenes from a courtship: Some theoretical and practical implications of interdisciplinary humanities curricula in the comprehensive high school. In S. Wineburg & P. Grossman (Eds.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Challenges to implementation (pp. 57-73). New York: Teachers College Press.