Catalytic enantioselective petasis-type reaction of quinolines catalyzed by a newly designed thiourea catalyst

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 129, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 6686-6687

  Yamaoka, Yousuke ^a   Miyabe, Hideto ^a   Takemoto, Yoshiji ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUINOLINE DERIVATIVE; THIOUREA DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY;

BORONIC ACIDS; CATALYSIS; QUINOLINES; THIOUREA;

EID: 34249793225     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja071470x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. (a) Rakotoson, H.; Fabre, N.; Jacquemond-Collet, I.; Hannedouche, S.; Fouraste, I.; Moulis, C. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 762.
2. (b) Jacquemond-Collet, I.; Hannedouche, S.; Fabre, N.; Moulis, C. Phytochemlstry 1999, 51, 1167.
3. (c) Houghton, P. J.; Woldemariam, T. Z.; Watanabe, Y.; Yates, M. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 250.
4. (a) Takamura, M.; Funabashi, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6327.
5. (b) Takamura, M.; Funabashi, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6801.
6. For addition to isoquinolines, see: (c) Funabashi, K.; Ratni, H.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6801.
7. (a) Alexakis, A.; Amiot, F. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2117.
8. (b) Amiot, F.; Cointeaux, L.; Silve, E. J.; Alexakis, A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 8221.
9. (c) Cointeaux, L.; Alexakis, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 925.
10. (a) Yoon, T. P.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 466.
11. (b) Taylor, M. S.; Tokunaga, N.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6700.
12. (a) Petasis, N. A.; Akritopoulou, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 34, 583.
13. (b) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 445.
14. (c) Petasis, N. A.; Goodman, A.; Zavialov, I. A. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 16463.
15. For some selected examples, see: (a) Batey, R. A.; MacKay, D. B.; Santhakumar, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5075.
16. (b) Wang, Q.; Finn, M. G. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4063.
17. (a) Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11798.
18. (b) Harwood, L. M.; Currie, G. S.; Drew, M. G. B.; Luke, R. W. A. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1953.
19. (c) Nanda, K. K.; Trotter, B. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2025.
20. (d) Southwood, T. J.; Curry, M. C.; Hutton, C. A. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 236.
21. For discussions on activation of N-acyl iminium ion by thiourea, see: (a) Taylor, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10558.
22. (b) Pan, S. C.; Zhou, J.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1.
23. (a) Okino, T.; Hoashi, Y.; Takemoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 12672.
24. (b) Hoashi, Y.; Okino, T.; Takemoto, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4032.
25. (c) Okino, T.; Hoashi, Y.; Furukawa, T.; Xu, X.; Takemoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 119.
26. (d) Inokuma, T.; Hoashi, Y.; Takemoto, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9413.
27. For recent reviews on organocatalyst, see: (a) Pihko, P. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2062.
28. (b) Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5138.
29. (c) Houk, K. N., List, B., Eds. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 487 special issue on organocatalysis.
30. (d) Bolm, C.; Rantanen, T.; Schiffers, I.; Zani, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1758.
31. (e) Seayad, J.; List, B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 719.
32. (f) Takemoto, Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 4299.
33. (g) Taylor, M. S.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1520.
34. Urea catalyst with a sulfinamide moiety was recently reported to promote allylation of acylhydrazones using an indium reagent. See: Tan, K. L.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1315.
35. 2 and toluene.
36. 2O instead of chloroformate led to lower ee.
37. Chang, Y. M.; Lee, S. H.; Nam, M. H.; Cho, M. Y.; Park, Y. S.; Yoon, C. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 3053.
38. The results of reactions using catalysts 1d-g are given in the Supporting Information.
39. 2OH as a proton source was less effective and led to a lower ee.
40. 3 was found to be optimal for not only enantioselectivity but also chemical efficiency.
41. The reaction with arylboronic acids bearing phenyl and p-methoxyphenyl groups gave no desired products owing to their low reactivities.