A theoretical study on the evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: Effects of female mate choice and male care bias

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 247, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 281-296

  Seki, Motohide ^a   Wakano, Joe Yuichiro ^a   Ihara, Yasuo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Extra pair paternity; Female mate preference; Mating system; Paternal care; Polyandry

Indexed keywords

COEVOLUTION; MATE CHOICE; PARENTAL CARE; POLYANDRY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY;

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FATHER CHILD RELATION; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MATING; NONHUMAN; PARENTAL BEHAVIOR; PATERNITY; POLYANDRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PATERNAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 34249783155     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Arnqvist G., and Nilsson T. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60 (2000) 145-164 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446
2. Bart J., and Tornes A. Importance of monogamous male birds in determining reproductive success-evidence for house wrens and a review of male-removal studies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24 (1989) 109-116
3. Bateman A.J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2 (1948) 349-368
4. Beckerman S., Lizarralde R., Ballew C., Schroeder S., Fingelton C., Garrison A., and Smith H. The Barí partible paternity project: preliminary results. Curr. Anthropol. 39 (1998) 164-167
5. Beckerman S., Lizarralde R., Lizarralde M., Bie J., Ballew C., Schroeder S., Dajani D., Walkup L., Hsiung M., Rawlins N., and Palermo M. The Barí partible paternity project: phase one. In: Beckerman S., and Valentine P. (Eds). Culture of Multiple Fathers: The Theory and Practice of Partible Paternity in South America (2002), University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL 27-41
6. Birkhead T.R. Sperm competition in birds: mechanisms and function. In: Birkhead T.R., and Møller A.P. (Eds). Sperm competition and sexual selection (1998), Academic Press, Sand Diego, CA 579-622
7. Blumer L.S. Male parental care in the bony fishes. Q. Rev. Biol. 54 (1979) 149-161
8. Brown G.E., Brown J.A., and Crosbie A.M. Phenotype matching in juvenile rainbow trout. Anim. Behav. 46 (1993) 1223-1225
9. Buss D.M. Sex difference in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12 (1989) 1-49
10. Cantoni D., and Brown R.E. Paternal investment and reproduction success in the California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Anim. Behav. 54 (1997) 377-386
11. Clutton-Brock T.H. The Evolution of Parental Care (1991), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
12. Daly M. The cost of mating. Am. Nat. 112 (1978) 771-774
13. Davies N.B. Cooperation and conflict among dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. Anim. Behav. 33 (1985) 628-648
14. Davies N.B., Hatchwell B.J., Robson T., and Burke T. Paternity and parental effort in dunnocks Prunella modularis: how good are male chick-feeding rules?. Anim. Behav. 43 (1992) 729-745
15. Dixon A., Ross D., O'Malley S.L.C., and Burke T. Paternal investment inversely related to degree of extra-pair paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371 (1994) 698-700
16. Forsgren E. Female sand gobies prefer good fathers over dominant males. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 264 (1997) 1283-1286
17. Garber P.A. One for all and breeding for one: cooperation and competition as a tamarin reproductive strategy. Evol. Anthropol. 5 (1997) 187-199
18. Gomendio M., Harcourt A.H., and Roldán E.R.S. Sperm competition in mammals. In: Birkhead T.R., and Møller A.P. (Eds). Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (1998), Academic Press, Sand Diego, CA 667-755
19. Gorman H.E., Arnold K.E., and Nager R.G. Incubation effort in relation to male attractiveness in zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. J. Avian Biol. 36 (2005) 413-420
20. Grafen A., and Sibly R. A model of mate desertion. Anim. Behav. 26 (1978) 645-652
21. Gray E.M. Female red-winged blackbirds accrue material benefits from copulating with extra-pair males. Anim. Behav. 53 (1997) 625-639
22. Gubernick D.J., and Teferi T. Adaptive significance of male parental care in a monogamous mammal. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 267 (2000) 147-150
23. Gubernick D.J., Wright S.L., and Brown R.E. The significance of father's presence for offspring survival in the monogamous California mouse, Peromyscus californicus. Anim. Behav. 46 (1993) 539-546
24. Harada Y., and Iwasa Y. Female mate preference to maximize paternal care: a two-step game. Am. Nat. 147 (1996) 996-1027
25. Hasselquist D., Bensch S., and von Schantz T. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature 381 (1996) 229-232
26. Hedrick P.W. Gametic disequilibrium measures: proceed with caution. Genetics 117 (1987) 331-341
27. Hill G.E. Plumage coloration is a sexually selected indicator of male quality. Nature 350 (1991) 337-339
28. Houston A.I., and McNamara J.M. John Maynard Smith and the importance of consistency in evolutionary game theory. Biol. Philos. 20 (2005) 933-950 10.1007/s10539-005-9016-4
29. Houston A.I., Gasson C.E., and McNamara J.M. Female choice of matings to maximize parental care. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 264 (1997) 173-179
30. Houston A.I., Székely T., and McNamara J.M. Conflict between parents over care. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 (2005) 33-38
31. Hunt J., and Simmons L.W. Confidence of paternity and paternal care: covariation revealed through the experimental manipulation of the mating system in the beetle Onthophagus taurus. J. Evol. Biol. 15 (2002) 784-795
32. Ihara Y. A model for evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating. Am. Nat. 160 (2002) 235-244
33. Iwasa Y., and Harada Y. Female mate preference to maximize paternal care. II. Female competition leads to monogamy. Am. Nat. 151 (1998) 367-382
34. Janetos A.C. Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7 (1980) 107-112
35. Jennions M.D., and Petrie M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75 (2000) 21-64
36. Kempenaers B. A case of polyandry in the blue tit: female extra-pair behaviour results in extra male help. Ornis Scand. 24 (1993) 246-249
37. Kempenaers B., Verheyen G.R., Van den Broeck M., Burke T., Van Broeckhoven C., and Dhondt A.A. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357 (1992) 494-496
38. Kirkpatrick M. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36 (1982) 1-12
39. Kokko H. Cuckoldry and the stability of biparental care. Ecol. Lett. 2 (1999) 247-255
40. Kvarnemo C. Evolution and maintenance of male care: is increased paternity a neglected benefit of care?. Behav. Ecol. 17 (2006) 144-148
41. Lewontin R.C. The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49 (1964) 49-67
42. Lifjeld J.T., Slagsvold T., and Ellegren H. Experimentally reduced paternity affects paternal effort and reproductive success in pied flycatchers. Anim. Behav. 55 (1998) 319-329
43. Ligon J.D., and Zwartjes P.W. Female red junglefowl choose to mate with multiple males. Anim. Behav. 49 (1995) 127-135
44. Lindström K., St. Mary C.M., and Pampoulie C. Sexual selection for male parental care in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 60 (2006) 46-51
45. Mateo J.M. Kin-recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 269 (2002) 721-727
46. Maynard Smith J. Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim. Behav. 25 (1977) 1-9
47. Mock D.W., and Fujioka M. Monogamy and long-term pair bonding in vertebrates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 (1990) 39-43
48. Møller A.P. Paternity and paternal care in the swallow, Hirundo rustica. Anim. Behav. 36 (1988) 996-1005
49. Møller A.P. Defence of offspring by male swallows, Hirundo rustica, in relation to participation in extra-pair copulations by their mates. Anim. Behav. 42 (1991) 261-267
50. Møller A.P. Male parental care, female reproductive success, and extrapair paternity. Behav. Ecol. 11 (2000) 161-168
51. Møller A.P., and Birkhead T.R. Certainty of paternity covaries with paternal care in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33 (1993) 261-268
52. Møller A.P., and Cuervo J.J. The evolution of paternity and paternal care in birds. Behav. Ecol. 5 (2000) 39-43
53. Møller A.P., and Thornhill R. Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 55 (1998) 1507-1515
54. Neff B.D., and Gross M.R. Dynamic adjustment of parental care in response to perceived paternity. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 268 (2001) 1559-1565
55. Östlund S., and Ahnesjö I. Female fifteen-spined sticklebacks prefer better fathers. Anim. Behav. 56 (1998) 1177-1183
56. Palokangas P., Korpimäki E., Hakkarainen H., Huhta E., Tolonen P., and Alatalo R.V. Female kestrels gain reproductive success by choosing brightly ornamented males. Anim. Behav. 47 (1994) 443-448
57. Préault M., Chastel O., Cézilly F., and Faivre B. Male bill colour and age are associated with parental abilities and breeding performance in blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 58 (2005) 497-505
58. Smith R.L. Paternity assurance and altered roles in the mating behaviour of a giant water bug, Abedus herberti (Heteroptera: Belostomatidae). Anim. Behav. 27 (1979) 716-725
59. Smith S.M. Extra-pair copulations in block-capped chickadees: the role of the female. Behaviour 107 (1988) 15-23
60. Soltis J., and McElreath R. Can females gain extra paternal investment by mating with multiple males? A game theoretic approach. Am. Nat. 158 (2001) 519-529
61. Sundberg J., and Larsson C. Male coloration as an indicator of parental quality in the yellowhammer, Emberiza citrinella. Anim. Behav. 48 (1994) 885-892
62. Sussman R.W., and Garber P.A. A new interpretation of the social organization and mating system of the Callitrichidae. Int. J. Primatol. 8 (1987) 73-92
63. Takahashi D., and Kohda M. Courtship in fast water currents by a male stream goby (Rhinogobius brunneus) communicates the parental quality honestly. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 55 (2004) 431-438
64. Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B.G. (Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man (1972), Aldine, Chicago 139-179
65. Wakano J.Y., and Ihara Y. Evolution of male parental care and female multiple mating: game-theoretical and two-locus diploid models. Am. Nat. 166 (2005) E32-E44
66. Webb J.N., Houston A.I., McNamara J.M., and Székely T. Multiple patterns of parental care. Anim. Behav. 58 (1999) 983-993
67. Wells K.D. Parental behavior of male and female frogs. In: Alexander R.D., and Tinkle D.W. (Eds). Natural Selection and Social Behavior (1981), Chiron, New York 184-197
68. Werren J.H., Gross M.R., and Shine R. Paternity and the evolution of male parental care. J. Theor. Biol. 82 (1980) 619-631
69. Wynne-Edwards K.E. Evidence for obligate monogamy in the Djungarian hamster, Phodopus campbelli: pup survival under different parenting conditions. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20 (1987) 427-437
70. Yamamura N., and Tsuji N. Parental care as a game. J. Evol. Biol. 6 (1993) 103-127