On the design of coordination diagnosis algorithms for teams of situated agents

Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 171, Issue 8-9, 2007, Pages 491-513

  Kalech, Meir ^a   Kaminka, Gal A ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Multi agent systems; Situated agents

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; PRODUCT DESIGN; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

DIAGNOSIS ALGORITHMS; SITUATED AGENTS; SOCIAL FAILURES;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 34249746148     PISSN: 00043702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2007.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cohen P.R., and Levesque H.J. Teamwork. Nous 25 4 (1991) 487-512
2. R. Davis, W.C. Hamscher, Model-based reasoning: Troubleshooting, In: A.E. Shrobe (Eds.), Exploring Artificial Intelligence: Survey Talks from the National Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 1988, pp. 297-346
3. de Kleer J., and Williams B.C. Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence 32 1 (1987) 97-130
4. C. Dellarocas, M. Klein, An experimental evaluation of domain-independent fault-handling services in open multi-agent systems, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multiagent Systems (ICMAS-00), 2000, pp. 95-102
5. R.J. Firby, An investigation into reactive planning in complex domains, in: American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87), 1987, pp. 196-201
6. P. Fröhlich, I. de Almeida Mora, W. Nejdl, M. Schröder, Diagnostic agents for distributed systems, in: ModelAge Workshop, 1997, pp. 173-186
7. Grosz B.J., and Kraus S. Collaborative plans for complex group actions. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 86 (1996) 269-358
8. In: Hamscher W., Console L., and de Kleer J. (Eds). Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis (1992), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA
9. B. Horling, V.R. Lesser, R. Vincent, A. Bazzan, P. Xuan, Diagnosis as an integral part of multi-agent adaptability, Technical Report CMPSCI Technical Report 1999-03, University of Massachusetts/Amherst, January 1999
10. Jennings N.R. Controlling cooperative problem solving in industrial multi-agent systems using joint intentions. Artificial Intelligence Journal 75 2 (1995) 195-240
11. M. Kalech, G.A. Kaminka, On the design of social diagnosis algorithms for multi-agent teams, in: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), 2003, pp. 370-375
12. M. Kalech, G.A. Kaminka, Towards model-based diagnosis of coordination failures, in: American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), 2005
13. M. Kalech, G.A. Kaminka, Diagnosis of multi-robot coordination failures using distributed csp algorithms, in: American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), 2006
14. G.A. Kaminka, Y. Elmaliach, I. Frenkel, R. Glick, M. Kalech, T. Shpigelman, Towards a comprehensive framework for teamwork in behavior-based robots, in: IAS-8. 2004
15. G.A. Kaminka, I. Frenkel, Flexible teamwork in behavior-based robots, in: American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), 2005, pp. 1355-1356
16. G.A. Kaminka, M. Tambe, What's wrong with us? Improving robustness through social diagnosis, in: American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-98), Madison, WI, 1998, pp. 97-104
17. Kaminka G.A., and Tambe M. Robust multi-agent teams via socially-attentive monitoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 12 (2000) 105-147
18. M. Klein, C. Dellarocas, Exception handling in agent systems, in: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents, May 1999, pp. 62-68
19. Kraus S., Katia S., and Evenchik A. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104 1-2 (1998) 1-69
20. Mataric M. Behavior-based robotics as a tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior behavior-based robotics as a tool for synthesis of artificial behavior and analysis of natural behavior. Trends in Cognitive Science 2 3 (1998) 82-87
21. R. Micalizio, P. Torasso, G. Torta, On-line monitoring and diagnosis of multi-agent systems: a model based approach, in: Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), vol. 16, 2004, pp. 848-852
22. Newell A. Unified Theories of Cognition (1990), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Parker L.E. ALLIANCE: An architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 14 2 (1998) 220-240
24. D. Poutakidis, L. Padgham, M. Winikoff, Debugging multi-agent systems using design artifacts: The case of interaction protocols, in: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS-02), 2002, pp. 960-967
25. Pynadath D.V., Tambe M., Chauvat N., and Cavedon L. Toward team-oriented programming. Proceedings of the Agents, Theories, Architectures and Languages (ATAL'99) Workshop. Intelligent Agents vol. V (1999), Springer-Verlag 77-91
26. Reiter R. A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence 32 1 (1987) 57-96
27. N. Roos, A. ten Teije, A. Bos, C. Witteveen, Multi-agent diagnosis: an analysis, in: Proceedings of the Belgium-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC-01), 2001, pp. 221-228
28. N. Roos, A. ten Teije, A. Bos, C. Witteveen, Multi-agent diagnosis with spatially distributed knowledge, in: Proceedings of the Belgium-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC-02), 2002, pp. 275-282
29. N. Roos, A. ten Teije, C. Witteveen, A protocol for multi-agent diagnosis with spatially distributed knowledge, in: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS-03), July 2003, pp. 655-661
30. N. Roos, A. ten Teije, C. Witteveen, Reaching diagnostic agreement in multi-agent diagnosis, in: Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS-04), 2004, pp. 1254-1255
31. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948) 379-693
32. Tambe M. Implementing agent teams in dynamic multi-agent environments. Applied Artificial Intelligence 12 2-3 (1998) 189-210
33. Tambe M. Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7 (1997) 83-124