The supreme court and abortion rights

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 356, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 2201-2207

  Annas, George J ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABORTION; COURT; CRIME; FREEDOM; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; JURISPRUDENCE; LAW; MEDICAL PRACTICE; ORGANIZATION; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETHICS; FEMALE; HISTORY; INDUCED ABORTION; LEGAL ASPECT; PHYSICIAN; PREGNANCY; PRIVACY; THERAPEUTIC ABORTION; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ABORTION, LEGAL; FEMALE; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMAN RIGHTS; HUMANS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; PREGNANCY; PRIVACY; SUPREME COURT DECISIONS; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 34249742518     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMhle072595     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
2. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).
3. Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914 (2000).
4. Gonzales v. Carhart, 2007 U.S. LEXIS 4338 (2007).
5. Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).
6. Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972).
7. Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973).
8. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976).
9. Elias S, Annas GJ. Reproductive genetics and the law. Chicago: Year Book Medical, 1987:145-162.
10. Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
11. Annas GJ. The Supreme Court, liberty, and abortion. N Engl J Med 1992;327:651-4.
12. Idem. Partial-birth abortion, Congress, and the Constitution. N Engl J Med 1998;339:279-83.
13. Idem. "Partial-birth abortion" and the Supreme Court. N Engl J Med 2001;344:152-6.
14. Greene MF, Ecker JL. Abortion, health, and the law. N Engl J Med 2004;350:184-6.
15. Drazen JM. Inserting government between patient and physician. N Engl J Med 2004;350:178-9.
16. Annas GJ, Glantz LH, Mariner WK. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. JAMA 1990;263:58-61.
17. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905).
18. Mariner WK, Annas GJ, Glantz LH. Jacobson v Massachusetts: it's not your great-great-grandfather's public health law. Am J Public Health 2005;95:581-90.
19. ACOG statement on the US Supreme Court decision upholding the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003. News release of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC, April 18, 2007. (Accessed May 3, 2007, at http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr04-18- 07.cfm.)
20. Hakim D. Spitzer pushing bill to shore up abortion rights. New York Times. April 26, 2007:A1.