Uncertainty evaluation of humidity sensors calibrated by saturated salt solutions

Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 591-599

  Lu, Tzehung ^a   Chen, Chiachung ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Calibration; Humidity sensor; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; INVERSE KINEMATICS; SATURATION (MATERIALS COMPOSITION); TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CALIBRATION METHODS; SATURATED SALT SOLUTIONS; TEMPERATURE VARIATIONS; UNCERTAINTY SOURCES;

HUMIDITY SENSORS;

EID: 34249720641     PISSN: 02632241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2006.09.012     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wiederhold P.R. Water Vapor Measurement (1997), Marcel Dekker, New York
2. Heinonen M. The CMA humidity standard. Measurement 17 3 (1996) 183-188
3. Su P., and Wu R. Uncertainty of humidity sensors testing by means of divided-flow generator. Measurement 36 (2004) 21-27
4. Takahashi C., and Kitano H. Calibration method of flow meters for a divided flow humidity generator. Sensor Actuator B 35-36 (1996) 522-527
5. Greenspan L. Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. A 81A 1 (1977) 89-96
6. Mohamed M.I., and Aggag G.A. Uncertainty evaluation of shore hardness testers. Measurement 33 (2003) 251-257
7. Park J.T., and Chang K. Application of statistics to oil density measurement. Measurement 30 (2001) 95-103
8. Kruh D. Assessment of uncertainty in calibration of a gas mass flow meter. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 5 (2000) 280-284
9. ISO GUM, Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 1993.
10. OMIL, The scale of relative humidity of air certified against saturated salt solutions, Organization Internationale De Metrologie Legale OMIL R 121, 1996.
11. Krutchkoff R.G. Classical and inverse regression methods of calibration. Technometrics 9 3 (1967) 425-439
12. Centner V., Massart D.L., and de Jong S. Inverse calibration predicts better than classical calibration. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 361 (1998) 2-9
13. Tellinghuisen J. Inverse vs. classical calibration for small data sets. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 368 (2000) 585-588
14. Grientschnig D. Relation between prediction errors of inverse and classical calibration. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 367 (2000) 497-498
15. Bruggemann L., and Wennrich R. Evaluation of measurement uncertainty for analytical procedures using a linear calibration function. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 7 (2002) 269-273
16. Heydorn K., and Anglov T. Calibration uncertainty. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 7 (2002) 153-158
17. Bruggemann L., and Wennrich R. Validation steps for traceability of linear calibrated chemical measurements. Accredit. Qual. Assur. 9 (2004) 493-498
18. M. Stevens, T. Collier, R. Harris, Comparison of instruments for measuring relative humidities, NPL Report CBTLM 6, National Physical Laboratory, UK, 2000.
19. Eurachem, EURACHEM/CITAC Guide Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, Eurachem, 2000.