Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict macrosomia

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 544-549

  Mazouni, C ^a,c   Rouzier, R ^b   Ledu, R ^a   Heckenroth, H ^a   Guidicelli, B ^a   Gamerre, M ^a  

^a ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE MARSEILLE   (France)

^b HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology ^*  (France)

Author keywords

Fetal weight; Hadlock; Macrosomia; Nomogram; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; ETHNICITY; FETUS; FETUS WEIGHT; HUMAN; MACROSOMIA; NOMOGRAM; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; FETAL WEIGHT; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTHERS; PARITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 34249717733     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.3999     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Surkan PJ, Hsieh CC, Johansson AL, Dickman PW, Cnattingius S. Reasons for increasing trends in large for gestational age births. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 720-726.
2. LaCoursiere DY, Bloebaum L, Duncan JD, Varner MW. Population-based trends and correlates of maternal overweight and obesity, Utah 1991-2001. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 832-839.
3. Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM, Catalano PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 964-968.
4. Onwude JL, Rao S, Selo-Ojeme DO. Large babies and unplanned Caesarean delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2005; 118: 36-39.
5. Stotland NE, Caughey AB, Breed EM, Escobar GJ. Risk factors and obstetric complications associated with macrosomia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 87: 220-226.
6. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H, Huffaker BJ. Accurate prediction of term birth weight from prospectively measurable maternal characteristics. J Reprod Med 1999; 44: 705-712.
7. Bagger PV, Sindberg Eriksen P, Secher NJ, Thisted J, Westergaard L. The precision and accuracy of symphysis-fundus distance measurements during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64: 371-374.
8. Farrell T, Holmes R, Stone P. The effect of body mass index on three methods of fetal weight estimation. BJOG 2002; 109: 651-657.
9. Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 25: 80-89.
10. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies and suspected fetal macrosomia. J Perinat Med 2004; 32: 113-121.
11. Pollack RN, Hauer-Pollack G, Divon MY. Macrosomia in postdates pregnancies: the accuracy of routine ultrasonographic screening. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 7-11.
12. Nahum GG, Stanislaw H. Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: how accurate is it? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 566-574.
13. Wikstrom I, Bergstrom R, Bakketeig L, Jacobsen G, Lindmark G. Prediction of high birthweight from maternal characteristics, symphysis fundal height and ultrasound biometry. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1993; 35: 27-33.
14. Mazouni C, Ledu R, Heckenroth H, Guidicelli B, Gamerre M, Bretelle F. [Delivery of a macrosomic infant: factors predictive of failed labor]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2006; 35: 265-269.
15. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurement: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333-337.
16. The R project for statistical computing. http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/CRAN/ [Accessed 20 August 2006].
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i: 307-310.
18. Bradley E, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to the Bootstrap Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Chapman and Hall: Boca Raton, 1993.
19. Rouzier R. Nomograms. http://www.ecsvd.org/nomogram.html [Accessed 20 August 2006].
20. Chauhan SP, Hendrix NW, Magann EF, Morrison JC, Kenney SP, Devoe LD. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 parturients. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 72-77.
21. Weiner Z, Ben-Shlomo I, Beck-Fruchter R, Goldberg Y, Shalev E. Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 105: 20-24.
22. Nahum GG, Pham KQ, Stanislaw H. Prediction of term birth weight in Hispanic women using an equation based on maternal characteristics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004; 112: 145-150.
23. Mongelli M, Gardosi J. Symphysis-fundus height and pregnancy characteristics in ultrasound-dated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94: 591-594.
24. Mongelli M. Fetal weight estimation by symphysis-fundus height and gestational age. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1997; 43: 20-24.
25. Sokol RJ, Chik L, Dombrowski MP, Zador IE. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1489-1495.
26. Farmer RM, Medearis AL, Hirata GI, Platt LD. The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the macrosomic fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166: 1467-1472.
27. Chuang L, Hwang JY, Chang CH, Yu CH, Chang FM. Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight with the use of computerized artificial neural network model. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002; 28: 991-996.
28. Levens A. Nomography. John Wiley & Sons : New-York, 1959.