Quantitative assessment of gestational sac shape: The gestational sac shape score (Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (2007) 29 (574-582) DOI:10.1002/uog.3994);Quantitative assessment of gestational sac shape: The gestational sac shape score

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 574-582

  Deter, R L ^a   Li, J ^b   Lee, W ^c   Liu, S ^b   Romero, R ^d  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Oakland University   (United States)

^c WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

Author keywords

Gestational sac; Gestational sac shape score; Quantitative shape analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FIRST TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; GESTATIONAL AGE; GRAVITY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

EID: 34249717731     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.6235     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Powell M, Goncalves LF, Espinoza J, Romero R. Quantitative and morphological assessment of early gestational sacs using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 255-260.
2. Metzenbauer M, Hafner E, Hoefinger D, Schuchter K, Stangl G, Ogris E, Philipp K. Three-dimensional ultrasound measurement of the placental volume in early pregnancy: method and correlation with biochemical placenta parameters. Placenta 2001; 22: 602-605.
3. Goncalves LF, Lee W, Espinoza J, Romero R. Examination of the fetal heart by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasound with spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 336-348.
4. Chang C-H, Yu CH, Chang F-M, Ko H-C, Chen H-Y. The assessment of normal fetal liver volume by three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003; 29: 1123-1129.
5. Gerards FA, Engels AJ, Twisk JWR, Van Vugt JMG. Normal fetal lung volume measured with three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 134-144.
6. Kuno A, Inubashiri E, Kanenishi K, Hata T. Three-dimensional sonographic measurement of fetal renal volume. J Med Ultrasonics 2006; 33: 43-47.
7. Blaas H-GK, Taipale P, Torp H, Eik-Nes SH. Three-dimensional ultrasound volume calculations of human embryos and young fetuses: a study of the volumetry of compound structures and its reproducibility. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 640-646.
8. Lee W, Deter RL, McNie B, Goncalves LF, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Romero R. Individualized growth assessment of fetal soft tissue using fractional thigh volume. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 766-774.
9. Pang BSF, Kot BCW, Ying M. Three-dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements: is the largest number of image planes necessary for outlining the region-of-interest? Ultrasound Med Biol 2006; 32: 1193-1202.
10. Cuzzi JC, Deter RL, Harris RJ. A general analytical method for evaluating differences in shape. Mikroskopie 1980; 37 (Suppl.): 61-63.
11. MacGregor SN, Tamura RK, Sabbagha RE, Minogue JP, Gibson ME, Hoffman DI. Underestimation of gestational age by conventional crown-rump length dating curves. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70: 344-348.
12. Kalache KD, Espinoza J, Chaiworapongsa T, Londono J, Schoen ML, Treadwell MC, Lee W, Romero R. Three-dimensional ultrasound fetal lung volume measurement: a systematic study comparing the multiplanar method with the rotational (VOCAL) technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 111-118.
13. Bartels RH, Beatty JC, Barsky BA. Hermite and cubic spline interpolation. In An Introduction to Splines for Use in Computer Graphics and Geometric Modelling. Morgan Kaufman: San Francisco, CA, 1998; 9-17.
14. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. Cubic spline interpolation. In Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1992; 107-110.
15. De Boor C. A Practical Guide to Splines. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1978.
16. Dachille F, Kaufman A. Incremental triangle voxelization. In Graphics Interface. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society: Mississauga, Canada, 2000; 205-212.
17. Arfken G. Diagonalization of matrices. In Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Academic Press: Orlando, FL, 1985; 217-229.
18. Harris RJ. Principal components analysis. In A Primer of Multivariate Statistics. Academic Press: Orlando, FL, 1985; 236-297.
19. Stevens MA. Tests based on EDF statistics. In Goodness-Of-Fit Techniques, D'Augostino RB, Stevens MA (eds). Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York, NY, 1986; 97-193.
20. Draper NR, Smith H. Fitting a straight line by least squares. In Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, 1981; 1-69.
21. Davydov O, Nurnberger G, Zeilfelder F. Cubic spline interpolation on nested polygon triangulations. In Curve And Surface Fitting, Cohen A, Rabut C, Schumaker LL (eds). Vanderbilt University Press: Nashville, TN, 2000; 161-170.
22. Kaufman A, Cohen D, Yagel R. Volume graphics. IEEE Computer 1993; 26: 51-64.
23. Lindsay DJ, Lovett IS, Lyons EA, Levi CS, Zheng XH, Holt SC, Dashefsky SM. Yolk sac diameter and shape at endovaginal US: predictors of pregnancy outcome in the first trimester. Radiology 1992; 183: 115-118.
24. Kucuk T, Duru NK, Yenen MC, Dede M, Ergun A, Baser I. Yolk sac size and shape as predictors of poor pregnancy outcome. J Perinat Med 1999; 27: 16-20.
25. Rempen A. The shape of the endometrium evaluated with three-dimensional ultrasound: an additional predictor of extrauterine pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 450-454.