Examining the content and privacy of web browsing incidental information

Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 123-132

  Hawkey, Kirstie ^a   Inkpen, Kori M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Ad hoc collaboration; Client side logging; Field study; Personalization; Privacy; Web browsing behaviour; Web page content

Indexed keywords

AD HOC NETWORKS; CLIENT SERVER COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DATA MINING; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; WEB BROWSERS; HARVESTING; LOGGING (FORESTRY);

AD HOC COLLABORATION; ELECTRONIC DIARIES; FIELD STUDY; PERSONALIZATION; WEB BROWSING; WEB PAGE CONTENT;

DATA PRIVACY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

AD HOC COLLABORATION; CLIENT-SIDE LOGGING; CONTENT; FIELD STUDY; PERSONALIZATION; PRIVACY; WEB BROWSING BEHAVIOUR; WEB PAGE;

EID: 34249711260     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1135777.1135801     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Cerberian Web Filter Categories. www.webrootdisp.net/audit/rating- descriptions.htm.
2. Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) Project. http://www.w3.org/P3P/.
3. WebRoot Software I Window Washer. http://www.webroot.com/consumer/ products/windowwasher/.
4. Yahoo! Directory. http://dir.yahoo.com.
5. ZoneAlarm Internet Security Suite Datasheet. http://download.zonelabs. com/bin/media/pdf/zaiss60_datasheet.pdf.
6. Ackerman, M., Cranor, L. and Reagle, J. (1999). Privacy in E-Commerce: Examining User Scenarios and Privacy Preferences. In Proc. of EC '99, Denver, CO, 1-8.
7. Acquisti, A. (2004). Privacy in Electronic Commerce and the Economics of Immediate Gratification. In Proc. of EC '04, New York, New York, 21-29.
8. Byrne, M., John, B., Wehrle, N. and Crow, D. (1999). The Tangled Web We Wove: A Taskonomy of WWW Use. In Proc. of CHI '99, Pittsburgh, PA, 544-551.
9. Cadiz, J. and Gupta, A. (2001). Privacy Interfaces for Collaboration. Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA. Technical Report No. MSR-TR-2001-82.
10. Catledge, L. and Pitkow, J. (1995). Characterizing Browsing Strategies in the World-Wide Web. In Proc. of WWW 1995, Darmstadt, Germany, 1065 -1073.
11. Consumer Reports (2005) Filtering software: Better, but still fallible. http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/internet-filtering- software-605/overview.htm.
12. Cothey, V. (2002). A Longitudinal Study of World Wide Web Users' Information-Searching Behavior.
13. Curry, A. (2002). What are Public Library Users Viewing on the Internet?: An Analysis of the Transaction Logs of Burnaby, Brantford, Calgary, Winnipeg, and Halifax Public Libraries, National Library and Archives Canada Virtual Collection of Monographs and Periodicals, http://tinyurl.com/8v7qc.
14. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York, Doubleday Anchor Books.
15. Hawkey, K. and Inkpen, K. (2005). Privacy Gradients: Exploring ways to manage incidental information during co-located collaboration. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM Press: 1431-1434.
16. Hawkey, K. and Inkpen, K. (2005). Web Browsing Today: The impact of changing contexts on user activity. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005. Portland, Oregon, ACM Press: 1443-1446.
17. Hunter, C. D. (2000). Social Impacts: Internet Filter Effectiveness Testing: Over- and Underinclusive Blocking Decisions of Four Popular Web Filters. Social Science Computer Review 18(2): 214-222.
18. Jensen, C., Potts, C. and Jensen, C. (2005). Privacy practices of Internet users: Self-reports versus observed behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63: 203-227.
19. Kaasten, S., Greenberg, S. and Edwards, C. (2002). How People Recognize Previously Seen WWW Pages from Titles, URLs and Thumbnails. In Proc. of Human Computer Interaction 2002, 247-265.
20. Kellar, M., Watters, C. and Shepherd, M. (2006). The Impact of Task on the Usage of Web Browser Navigation Tools. In Proc. of Graphics Interface, Quebec City, Canada, (to appear).
21. Lau, T., Etzioni, O. and Weld, D. S. (1999). Privacy Interfaces for Information Management. Communications of the ACM 42(10): 89-94.
22. Lederer, S., Mankoff, J. and Dey, A. K. (2003). Towards a Deconstruction of the Privacy Space. Workshop on Ubicomp Communities: Privacy as Boundary Negotiation, UBICOMP 2003, http://guir.berkeley.edu/pubs/ubicomp2003/ privacyworkshop/papers/lederer-privacyspace.pdf
23. Nie, N. H. and Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and Society: A Preliminary Report, Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, http://www.stanford.edu/group/siqss/ Press_Release/Preliminary_Report.pdf.
24. Olson, J. S., Grudin, J. and Horvitz, E. (2005). A Study of Preferences for Sharing and Privacy. Ext. Abstracts of CHI '05. Portland, Oregon, ACM Press: 1985-1988.
25. Palen, L. and Dourish, P. (2003). Unpacking "Privacy" for a Networked World. In Proc. of CHI '03, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 129-136.
26. Sellen, A. J., Murphy, R. and Shaw, K. L. (2002). How Knowledge Workers Use the Web. In Proc. of CHI '02, Minneapolis, MN, 227-234.
27. Tauscher, L. and Greenberg, S. (1997). Revisitation patterns in World Wide Web navigation. In Proc. of CHI '97, Atlanta, GA.
28. Weisband, S. P. and Reinig, B. A. (1995). Managing User Perceptions of Email Privacy. Communications of the ACM 38(12): 40-47.