Happiness and loss aversion: Is utility concave or convex in relative income?

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 91, Issue 7-8, 2007, Pages 1423-1448

  Vendrik, Maarten C M ^a   Woltjer, Geert B ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Life satisfaction; Loss aversion; Relative income; Social participation; Value function

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249697067     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Blanchflower D.G., and Oswald A.J. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics 88 (2004) 1359-1386
2. Clark A.E., and Oswald A.J. Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics 61 (1996) 359-381
3. Clark A.E., and Oswald A.J. Comparison-concave utility and following behaviour in social and economic settings. Journal of Public Economics 70 (1998) 133-155
4. Diener E., Sandvik E., Seidlitz L., and Diener M. The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute?. Social Indicators Research 28 (1993) 195-223
5. Di Tella, R., Haisken-De New, J., MacCulloch, R., 2005. Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Mimeo. Harvard Business School.
6. Duesenberry J.S. Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior (1949), MA, Cambridge
7. Easterlin R.A. Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In: David P.A., and Reder M.W. (Eds). Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramowitz (1974), Academic Press, New York and London 89-125
8. Easterlin R.A. Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27 (1995) 35-47
9. Easterlin R.A. Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Economic Journal 111 473 (2001) 465-484
10. Falk, A., Knell, M., 2003. Choosing the Joneses: on the endogeneity of reference groups. Mimeo. University of Zurich.
11. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. Journal of Public Economics 89 (2005) 997-1019
12. Ferrer-i-Carbonell A., and Frijters P. How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness?. Economic Journal 114 (2004) 641-659
13. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison. Human Relations 7 (1954) 117-140
14. Frank R.H. The frame of reference as a public good. Economic Journal 107 (1997) 1832-1847
15. Frey B.S., and Stutzer A. Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Well-Being (2002), Princeton University Press, Oxford
16. Frey B.S., and Stutzer A. What can economists learn from happiness research?. Journal of Economic Literature 40 (2002) 402-435
17. Galanter E. Utility functions for nonmonetary events. American Journal of Psychology 103 (1990) 449-470
18. Glatzer W. Quality of life in advanced industrialized countries: the case of West Germany. In: Strack F., Argyle M., and Schwarz N. (Eds). Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (1991), Pergamon, Oxford 261-279
19. Goette L., Fehr E., and Huffman D. Loss aversion and labor supply. Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2004) 216-218
20. Johansson-Stenman O., and Martinsson P. Identity, self-deception and subjective well-being. Mimeo. Department of Economics. (2005), Götenborg University
21. Kahneman D. Objective happiness. In: Kahneman D., Diener E., and Schwarz N. (Eds). Well-Being: the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (1999), Russell Sage Foundation, Chapter 1, New York
22. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping Bounded Rationality. American Psychologist 58 (2003) 697-720
23. Kahneman D., Diener E., and Schwarz N. Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology (1999), Russell Sage Foundation, New York
24. Kahneman D., Knetch J.L., and Thaler R.H. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1991) 193-206
25. Kahneman D., and Krueger A.B. Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2006) 3-24
26. Kahneman D., and Thaler R.H. Anomalies: utility maximization and experienced utility. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (2006) 221-234
27. Kahneman D., and Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (1979) 263-291
28. Kahneman D., Wakker P.P., and Sarin R. Back to Bentham?: explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1997) 375-405
29. Kapteyn A., and Wansbeek T. The individual welfare function: a review. Journal of Economic Psychology 6 (1985) 333-363
30. Köbberling, V., Schwieren, C., Wakker, P.P., 2004. Prospect-theory's diminishing sensitivity versus economics' intrinsic utility of money: how the introduction of the euro can be used to disentangle the two empirically. Mimeo. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Maastricht University.
31. Köbberling V., and Wakker P.P. An index of loss aversion. Journal of Economic Theory 122 (2005) 119-131
32. Kroh M., and Spiess M. Documentation of sample sizes and panel attrition in the German Socio Economic Panel (SOEP) 1984-2004. Data Documentation vol. 6 (2005), DIW, Berlin
33. Layard, R., Mayraz, G., Nickell, S., 2006. The marginal utility of income. Mimeo. London School of Economics.
34. Luttmer E. Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (2005) 963-1002
35. McBride M. Relative-income effects on subjective well-being in the cross-section. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 45 (2001) 251-278
36. Oswald A.J. On the common claim that happiness equations demonstrate diminishing marginal utility of income. IZA discussion paper 1781 (2005), IZA, Bonn
37. Schyns P. Wealth of nations, individual income and life satisfaction in 42 countries: a multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research 60 (2002) 5-40
38. Sen A.K. Commodities and Capabilities (1985), North-Holland, Amsterdam
39. Senik C. When information dominates comparison: learning from Russian subjective panel data. Journal of Public Economics 88 (2004) 2099-2123
40. Stutzer, A., 2003. Income aspirations, subjective well-being and labor supply. Mimeo. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich.
41. Stutzer A. The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 54 (2004) 89-109
42. Swalm R.O. Utility theory: insights into risk taking. Harvard Business Review 44 (1966) 123-136
43. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (1991) 1039-1061
44. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (1992) 297-323
45. Van Praag B.M.S., and Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. Happiness Quantified: A Satisfaction Calculus Approach (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
46. Van Praag B.M.S., Frijters P., and Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 51 (2003) 29-49
47. Vendrik, M.C.M., Woltjer, G.B., 2006. Happiness and loss aversion: when social participation dominates comparison. METEOR Research Memorandum RM/06/027. Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Maastricht University.
48. Vendrik M., and Hirata J. Experienced versus decision utility of income: relative or absolute happiness. In: Bruni L., and Porta P.L. (Eds). Handbook on the Economics of Happiness (2007), Edward Elgar, Camberly, Surrey 185-208
49. Wagner G.G., Burkhauser R.V., and Behringer F. The English language public use file of the German Socio-Economic Panel. Journal of Human Resources 28 (1993) 429-433
50. Wakker P.P., and Tversky A. An axiomatization of cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7 (1993) 147-176
51. Weinzerl, M., 2006. Estimating a relative utility function. Mimeo. Harvard University.
52. Winkelmann L., and Winkelmann R. Why are the unemployed so unhappy? Evidence from panel data. Economica 65 (1998) 1-15