Long-term monitoring and evaluation of the lower red river meadow restoration project, Idaho, U.S.A

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 223-239

  Klein, Linda R ^a   Clayton, Stephen R ^b   Alldredge, J Richard ^a   Goodwin, Peter ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Ecological signifi cance; Long term monitoring and evaluation; Natural channel design; Performance criteria; Stream and riparian restoration

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; MEADOW; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIPARIAN ZONE;

IDAHO; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

AVES; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 34249688513     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00206.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Allen, A. M. 1986. Habitat suitability index models: Mink. Biol. Rep. 82 (10.127). U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Ecology Research Center, Fort Collins, Colorado.
2. Angermeier, P. L., and R. A. Smogor. 1995. Estimating number of species and relative abundance in stream-fish communities: Effects of sampling effort and discontinuous spatial distributions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 936-949.
3. Barinaga, M. 1996. A recipe for river recovery? Science 273: 1648-1650.
4. Bash, J. S., and C. M. Ryan. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: Is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29: 877-885.
5. Beattie, G. D. 2003. Evaluation of geomorphic trends using cross section data: Lower Red River Meadow Restoration. M.S. thesis. University of Idaho, Moscow.
6. Bernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, et al. 2005. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636-637.
7. Bisson, P. A., J. L. Nielsen, R. A. Palmason, and L. E. Grove. 1982. A system of naming habitat types in small streams, with examples of habitat utilization by salmonids during low streamflow. Pages 62-73 in N. B. Armantrout, editor. Proceedings, "Symposium on Acquisition and Utilization of Aquatic Habitat Inventory Information." Western Division of the American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
8. Bjornn, T. C., and D. W. Reiser. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Pages 83-138 in W. R. Meehan, editor. Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats. American Fisheries Society Special Publication 19, Bethesda, Maryland.
9. BPA (Bonneville Power Administration). 1996. Lower Red River Meadow Restoration Project environmental assessment. DOE No. 1027, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon.
10. Bowles, E. C., and E. J. Leitzinger. 1991. Salmon supplementation studies in Idaho rivers. U.S. Department of Energy, Bonneville Power Administration Contract No. De-B179-89BPo1466, Portland, Oregon.
11. Brady, N. C., and R. R. Weil. 2002. Nature and properties of soils. 13 th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
12. Cagney, J. 1993. Riparian area management: Greenline riparian-wetland monitoring. TR 1737-8. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Service Center, Denver, Colorado.
13. Clayton, S. R. 2002. Quantitative evaluation of physical and biological responses to stream restoration. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow.
14. DHI (DHI Water and Environment). 2000. MIKE 11: A modeling system for rivers and channels. User Guide. DHI Software. DHI Water and Environment, Horsholm, Denmark.
15. Donley, K. 2003. Changes in local groundwater elevation following stream restoration in the Lower Red River Meadow, Idaho. M.S. thesis. Boise State University, Boise, Idaho.
16. Downs, P. W., and G. M. Kondolf. 2002. Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29: 477-496.
17. FISRWG (Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group). 1998. Stream corridor restoration: Principles, processes, and practices. GPO No. 0120-A, SuDocs No. A57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
18. Giller, P. S. 2005. River restoration: Seeking ecological standards. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 201-207.
19. Gillilan, S., K. Boyd, T. Hoitsma, and M. Kauffman. 2005. Challenges in developing and implementing ecological standards for geomorphic river restoration projects: A practitioner's response to Palmer et al. (2005). Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 223-227.
20. Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. BioScience 41: 540-551.
21. Hankin, D. G., and G. H. Reeves. 1988. Estimating total fish abundance and total habitat area in small streams based on visual estimation methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45: 1746-1759.
22. Harrelson, C. C., C. L. Rawlins, and J. P. Potyondy. 1994. Stream channel reference sites: An illustrated guide to field technique. GTR-RM-245. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado.
23. Hays, R. L., C. Summers, and W. Seitz. 1981. Estimating wildlife habitat variables. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-81/47, Washington, D.C.
24. Henry, C. P., C. Amoros, and N. Roset. 2002. Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: A 5-year post-operation survey on the Rhone River, France. Ecological Engineering 18: 543-554.
25. ISG (Independent Scientific Group). 1996. Return to the river: restoration of salmonid fishes in the Columbia River ecosystem. Document 96-6. Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, Oregon.
26. ISG. 1999. Scientific issues in the restoration of salmonid fishes in the Columbia River. Fisheries 24: 10-19.
27. Jansson, R., H. Backx, A. J. Boulton, M. Dixon, D. Dudgeon, F. M. R. Hughes, K. Nakamura, E. H. Stanley, and K. Tockner. 2005. Stating mechanisms and refining criteria for ecologically successful river restoration: A comment on Palmer et al. (2005). Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 218-222.
28. Johnson, D. H. 1999. The insignificance of statistical significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 763-772.
29. Kauffman, J. B., R. L. Beschta, N. Otting, and D. Lytjen. 1997. An ecological perspective of riparian and stream restoration in the western United States. Fisheries 22: 12-24.
30. Kershner, J. L. 1997. Monitoring and adaptive management. Pages 116-131 in J. E. Williams, C. A. Wood, and M. P. Dombeck, editors. Watershed restoration: Principles and practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
31. Knighton, D. 1998. Fluvial forms and processes: A new perspective. Arnold, London, United Kingdom.
32. Kondolf, G. M. 1995. Five elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3: 133-136.
33. Kondolf, G. M. 2000. Assessing salmonid spawning gravel quality. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 262-281.
34. Kondolf, G. M., and E. R. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19: 1-15.
35. Lake, P. S. 2005. Perturbation, restoration and seeking ecological sustainability in Australian flowing waters. Hydrobiologia 552: 109-120.
36. Leopold, L. B., and M. G. Wolman. 1957. River channel patterns - braided, meandering and straight. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282B: 39-85.
37. Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, California. (Reprinted in 1995 by Dover Publications, Inc., New York.)
38. Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
39. Marmorek, D. R., I. J. Parnell, M. Porter, C. Pinkham, C. A. D. Alexander, C. N. Peters, J. Hubble, C. M. Paulsen, and T. R. Fisher. 2004. A multiple watershed approach to assessing the effects of habitat restoration actions on anadromous and resident fish populations. ESSA Technologies Ltd., Vancouver, British Columbia, for Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon.
40. Minitab, Inc. 2003. Minitab 14.1. Minitab, Inc., State College, Pennsylvania.
41. Moerke, A. H., and G. A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoring stream ecosystems: lessons from a midwestern state. Restoration Ecology 12: 327-334.
42. Montgomery, D. R., and J. M. Buffington. 1998. Channel processes, classification, and response. Pages 13-42 in R. Naiman and R. Bilby, editors. River ecology and management. Springer-Verlag, New York.
43. Naiman, R. J., and H. Décamps. 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 621-658.
44. National Geographic Society. 1987. Field guide to the birds of North America. 2nd edition. National Geographic Society, Washington, D.C.
45. NPCC (Northwest Power and Conservation Council). 1994. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Report 94-55, Formerly the Northwest Power Planning Council, Portland, Oregon.
46. NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Riparian areas: Functions and strategies for management. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
47. Padgett, W. G., A. P. Youngblood, and A. H. Winward. 1989. Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho. R4-Ecol-89-01. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, Utah.
48. Palmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217.
49. Peterson, R. T. 1998. A field guide to western birds. Houghlin Mifflin Co., Boston, Massachusetts.
50. Pretty, J. L., S. S. C. Harrison, D. J. Shepherd, C. Smith, A. G. Hildrew, and R. D. Hey. 2003. River rehabilitation and fish populations: assessing the benefit of instream structures. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 251-265.
51. Reeve, T., J. Lichatowich, W. Towey, and A. Duncan. 2006. Building science and accountability into community-based restoration: Can a new funding approach facilitate effective and accountable restoration? Fisheries 31: 17-24.
52. Robinson, D. H., and H. Wainer. 2002. On the past and future of null hypothesis significance testing. Journal of Wildlife Management 66: 263-271.
53. Roni, P., K. Hanson, T. Beechie, G. Pess, M. Pollock, and D. M. Bartley. 2005. Habitat rehabilitation for inland fisheries. Global review of effectiveness and guidance for rehabilitation of freshwater ecosystems. Fisheries Technical Paper No. 484, FAO, Rome, Italy.
54. Rosgen, D. 1996. Applied river morphology. Wildland Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, Colorado.
55. Ryder, D. S., and W. Miller. 2005. Setting goals and measuring success: linking patterns and processes in stream restoration. Hydrobiologia 552: 147-158.
56. SER (Society for Ecological Restoration) International. 2004. The SER International primer on ecological restoration. www.ser.org. Science and Policy Working Group. Society for Ecological Restoration International, Tucson, Arizona.
57. Shipley, B. 2000. Cause and correlation in biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
58. Stephens, P. A., S. W. Buskirk, G. D. Hayward, and C. M. Del Rio. 2005. Information theory and hypothesis testing: A call for pluralism. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 4-12.
59. Thurow, R. F. 1994. Underwater methods for study of salmonids in the Intermountain West. General Technical Report INT-GTR-307, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, Utah.
60. USFS (U.S. Forest Service). 1992. Integrated riparian evaluation guide. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, Utah.
61. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Habitat evaluation procedures. Ecological Services Manual 102, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Services, Washington, D.C.
62. Ward, J. V., K. Tockner, U. Uehlinger, and F. Malard. 2001. Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 17: 311-323.
63. Williams, J. E., C. A. Wood, and M. P. Dombeck, editors. 1997. Watershed restoration: Principles and practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
64. Wissmar, R. C., and R. L. Beschta. 1998. Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems: A catchment perspective. Freshwater Biology 40: 571-585.
65. Wohl, E., P. L. Angermeier, B. Bledsoe, G. M. Kondolf, L. MacDonnell, D. M. Merritt, M. A. Palmer, N. L. Poff, and D. Tarboton. 2005. River restoration. Water Resources Research 41, W10301, doi:10.1029/ 2005WR003985.
66. Wolman, M. G. 1954. A method of sampling coarse river-bed material. American Geophysical Union Transactions 35: 951-956.
67. Yoccoz, N. G. 1991. Use, overuse, and misuse of significance tests in evolutionary biology and ecology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 71: 106-111.