The comparative law and economics of pure economic loss

International Review of Law and Economics

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 29-48

  Parisi, Francesco ^a   Palmer, Vernon Valentine ^b   Bussani, Mauro ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Comparative law; Economic loss; Negligence; Private and social loss; Tort law

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249686665     PISSN: 01448188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2007.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arlen J. Tort damages. In: Bouckaert B., and De Geest G. (Eds). Encyclopedia of law and economics vol. 2 (2000) 682
2. Benson P. The basis for excluding liability for economic loss in tort law. In: Owen D. (Ed). Philosophical foundations of tort law (1995), Clarendon Press
3. Bussani M. La colpa soggettiva (1991), Cedam
4. Bussani M., and Palmer V.V. The liability regimes of Europe-their facades and interiors. In: Bussani M., and Palmer V.V. (Eds). Pure economic loss in Europe (2003), Cambridge University Press
5. Bussani M., Palmer V., and Parisi F. Liability for pure financial loss in europe: An economic restatement. Am. J. Comp. L. 51 (2003) 113-162
6. Dari-Mattiacci G. The economics of pure economic loss and the internalisation of multiple externalities. In: van Boom W., Koziol H., and Witting C. (Eds). Tort and insurance law: Pure economic loss 9 (2004), Springer 167-190
7. Feldthusen B. Economic negligence. 4th ed. (2000), Carswell p. 11-12
8. Gilead I. Tort law and internalization: The gap between private loss and social cost. 17 International Review of Law and Economics 589 (1997) 604-606
9. Goldberg V.P. Recovery for economic loss following the exxon valdez oil spill. Journal of Legal Studies 23 (1994) 1
10. Gómez, F., Ruiz, J.A. (2002). The plural - and misleading - notion of economic loss in tort: a law and economics perspective, InDret Working Paper no. 102.
11. Gordley J.R. The rule against recovery in negligence for pure economic loss: An historical accident?. In: Bussani M., and Palmer V. (Eds). Pure economic loss in Europe (2003), Cambridge University Press
12. Landes W.M., and Posner R.A. The economic structure of tort law (1987), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
13. Posner R.A. Economic analysis of law. 6th ed. (2003), Aspen Publishers
14. Rabin R.L. The historical development of the fault principle: A reinterpretation. 15 Georgia Law Review 925 (1981) 927-961
15. Rabin R.L. Tort recovery for negligently inflicted economic loss: A reassessment. Stanford Law Review 37 (1985) 1513
16. Schwartz G.T. The economic loss doctrine in american tort law: Assessing the recent experience. In: Banakas E.K. (Ed). Civil liability for pure economic loss (1995) 103
17. Schwartz G.T. American tort law and the (supposed) economic loss rule. In: Bussani M., and Palmer V. (Eds). Pure economic loss in Europe (2001), Cambridge University Press
18. Spier J. The limits of liability. Keeping the floodgates shut (1996), Kluwer Law International
19. Spier J. The limits of expanding liability (1998), Springer
20. Sykes A.O. Subrogation and insolvency. Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2001) 383
21. van Boom W.H. Pure economic loss-a comparative perspective. In: van Boom W.H., Koziol H., and Witting C.A. (Eds). Pure economic loss (2004), Springer, Wien/New York
22. Viney, G. (1995). Introduction a la responsabilité, in Traité dr. civ., sous la dir de J. Ghestin 21 (LGDJ 2nd ed.).
23. von Bar C. Liability for information and opinions causing pure economic loss to third parties: A comparison of English and German case law. In: Markesinis B. (Ed). The gradual convergence (1994) 104
24. von Ihering R. Jarbücher für die Dogmatik des bürgerlichen Recths vol. 4 (1861), Jena pp. 12-13
25. Waldron, J. (1995). Moments of carelessness and massive loss. In Owen, D. (Ed.), Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law 387: Oxford.
26. Weir T. A casebook on tort 6. 9th ed. (2000), Sweet & Maxwell