Short-term temporal effects on community structure of Lepidoptera in restored and remnant Tallgrass prairies

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 179-188

  Summerville, Keith S ^a   Bonte, Anson C ^a   Fox, Lena C ^a  

^a DRAKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community assembly; Contingency; Moths; Prairie management; Restoration ecology; Year effects

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; MOTH; PRAIRIE; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPECIES RICHNESS;

IOWA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 34249681258     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00182.x     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Brown, J. S. 1994. Restoration ecology: Living with the prime directive. Pages 351-381 in M. L. Bowles and C. J. Whelan, editors. Restoration of endangered species. Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom.
2. Clinchy, M., D. T. Haydon, and A. T. Smith. 2002. Pattern does not equal process: What does patch occupancy really tell us about metapopulation dynamics? American Naturalist 159: 351-362.
3. Coleman, B. D., M. A. Mares, M. R. Willig, and Y.-H. Hseih. 1982. Randomness, area, and species richness. Ecology 63: 1121-1133.
4. Colwell, R. K. 2002. Estimates: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 7.0. User's Guide and Application (available from http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates) accessed 12 November 2005.
5. Cook, W. M., J. Yao, B. L. Foster, R. D. Holt, and L. B. Patrick. 2005. Secondary succession in an experimentally fragmented landscape: community patterns across space and time. Ecology 86: 1267-1279.
6. Gotelli, N. J., and R. K. Colwell. 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4: 379-391.
7. Hilt, N., and K. Fiedler. 2005. Diversity and composition of Arctiidae moth assemblages along a successional gradient in the Ecuadorian Andes. Diversity and Distributions 11: 387-398.
8. Hobbs, R. J. 2005. Restoration ecology and landscape ecology. Pages 217-229 in J. Wiens and M. Moss, editors. Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom.
9. Hobbs, R. J., and J. A. Harris. 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the Earth's ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 9: 93-110.
10. Holl, K. 1996. The effect of coal surface mine reclamation on diurnal lepidopteran conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 225-236.
11. Holt, R. D. 1993. Ecology at the mesoscale: The influence of regional processes on local communities. Pages 77-88 in R. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, editors. Species diversity in ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Illinois.
12. Inoue, T. 2003. Chronosequential change in a butterfly community after clear-cutting of deciduous forests in a cool temperate region of central Japan. Entomological Science 6: 151-163.
13. Kitahara, M., and K. Sei. 2001. A comparison of the diversity and structure of butterfly communities in semi-natural and human-modified grassland habitats at the foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 331-351.
14. Koh, L. P., N. S. Sodhi, and B. W. Brook. 2004. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in tropical butterflies. Conservation Biology 18: 1571-1578.
15. Krebs, C. J. 1999. Ecological methodology. 2nd edition. Benjamin Cummings, New York.
16. Lepš, J., K. Spitzer, and J. Jaroš. 1998. Food plants, species composition, and variability of the moth community in undisturbed forest. Oikos 81: 538-548.
17. Lockwood, J. L., and S. L. Pimm. 1999. When does restoration succeed? Pages 363-392 in E. Weiher and P. Keddy, editors. Ecological assembly rules: Perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, London, United Kingdom.
18. Lockwood, J. L., and C. L. Samuels. 2004. Assembly models and the practice of restoration. Pages 55-70 in V. M. Temperton, R. J. Hobbs, T. Nuttle, and S. Hale, editors. Assembly rules and restoration ecology. Island Press, California.
19. McCune, B., and J. B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
20. Metzler, E. H., J. A. Shuey, L. A. Ferge, R. A. Henderson, and P. Z. Goldstein. 2005. Contributions to the understanding of Tallgrass prairie-dependent butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) and their biogeography in the United States. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin New Series 15: 1-143.
21. Morecroft, M. D., C. E. Bealy, O. Howells, S. Rennie, and I. P. Woiwod. 2002. Effects of drought on contrasting insect and plant species in the UK in the mid-1990's. Global Ecology and Biogeography 11: 7-22.
22. Mouquet, N., and M. Loreau. 2003. Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. American Naturalist 162: 544-557.
23. Nekola, J. C., and P. S. White. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. Journal of Biogeography 26: 867-878.
24. Ostaff, D. P., and D. T. Quiring. 2000. Role of the host plant in the decline of populations of a specialist herbivore, the spruce bud moth. Journal of Animal Ecology 69: 263-273.
25. Panzer, R., D. Stillwaugh, R. Gnaedinger, and G. Derkoviotz. 1995. Prevalence of remnant dependence among the prairie and savanna inhabiting insects of the Chicago region. Nature Areas Journal 15: 101-116.
26. Panzer, R. P. 2002. Compatibility of prescribed burning with conservation of insects in small, isolated prairie reserves. Conservation Biology 16: 1296-1307.
27. Parker, K. R., and J. A Wiens. 2005. Assessing recovery following environmental accidents: Environmental variation, ecological assumptions, and strategies. Ecological Applications 15: 2037-2051.
28. Perrow, M. R., and A. J. Davy. 2002. Handbook of ecological restoration. Cambridge Press, London, United Kingdom.
29. Piegorsch, W. W., and A. J. Bailer. 1997. Statistics for environmental biology and toxicology. Chapman & Hall, New York.
30. Pollard, E., and D. Moss. 1995. Historical records of the occurrence of butterflies in Britain: Examples showing associations between annual number and weather. Global Change Biology 1: 107-113.
31. Potvin, C., M. J. Lechowicz, and S. Tardif. 1990. The statistical analysis of eco-physiological response curves obtained from experiments involving repeated measures. Ecology 71: 1389-1400.
32. Pöyry, J., S. Lindgren, J. Salminen, and M. Kuussaari. 2005. Responses of butterfly and moth species to restored cattle grazing in semi-natural grasslands. Biological Conservation 122: 465-478.
33. Ricketts, T. H., E. Dinerstein, D. M. Olson, C. J. Loucks, W. M. Eichbaum, D. A. DellaSalla, et al. 1999. Terrestrial ecoregions of North America: A conservation assessment. Island Press, Covalo, California.
34. Ries, L., D. M. Debinski, and M. L. Wieland. 2001. Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conservation Biology 15: 410-411.
35. Rosburg, T. R. 2001. Iowa's prairie heritage: From the past, through the present, and into the future. Pages 1-14 in N. P. Bernstein and L. J. Ostander, editors. Proceedings of the 17th Annual North American Prairie Conference. 16-20 July 2000. North Iowa Area Community College, Mason City, Iowa.
36. Roy, D. B., P. Rothery, D. Moss, E. Pollard, and J. A. Thomas. 2001. Butterfly numbers and weather: Predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 201-217.
37. Saarinen, K., and J. Jantunen. 2005. Grassland butterfly fauna under traditional animal husbandry: Contrasts in diversity in mown meadows and grazed pastures. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 3201-3213.
38. SAS Institute. 2002. SAS for Windows. release 8.0. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina.
39. Schlict, D. W., and T. T. Orwig. 1999. The status of Iowa's Lepidoptera. Journal of the Iowa Academy of Sciences 105: 82-88.
40. Shepherd, S., and D. M. Debinski. 2005. Evaluation of isolated and integrated prairie reconstructions as habitat for prairie butterflies. Biological Conservation 126: 51-61.
41. Spitzer, K., and J. Lepš. 1988. Determinants of temporal variation in moth abundance. Oikos 53: 31-36.
42. Spitzer, K., M. Rajmánek, and T. Soldán. 1984. The fecundity and long-term variability in abundance of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Oecologia 62: 91-93.
43. Steffan-Dewenter, I., and T. Tscharntke. 1997. Early succession of butterfly and plant communities on set-aside fields. Oecologia 109: 294-302.
44. Summerville, K. S., C. J. Conoan, and R. M. Steichen. 2006. Species traits as predictors of the frequency of occurrence of Lepidoptera in restored and remnant Tallgrass prairies. Ecological Applications 16: 891-900.
45. Summerville, K. S., and T. O. Crist. 2005. Temporal patterns of species accumulation in a survey of Lepidoptera in a beech-maple forest. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 3393-3406.
46. Summerville, K. S., R. M. Steichen, and M. N. Lewis. 2005. Restoring lepidopteran communities to oak savannas: Contrasting influences of habitat quantity and quality. Restoration Ecology 13: 120-128.
47. Swengel, A. B. 1996. Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biological Conservation 76: 73-85.
48. Von Ende, C. N. 2001. Repeated-measures analysis: Growth and other time-dependent measures. Pages 134-157 in S. M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch, editors. Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York.
49. Waltz, A. E. M., and W. W. Covington. 2004. Ecological restoration treatments increase butterfly richness and abundance: Mechanisms of response. Restoration Ecology 12: 85-96.
50. Winter, W. D. Jr. 2000. Basic techniques for observing and studying moths and butterflies. Memoirs of the Lepidopterists Society No. 5. The Lepidopterists Society, Clinton, New York.
51. Woiwod, I. P., and I. Hanski. 1992. Patterns of density dependence in moths and aphids. Journal of Animal Ecology 61: 619-629.
52. Yela, J. L., and M. Holyoak. 1997. Effects of moonlight and meteorological factors on light and bait trap catches of noctuid moths. Environmental Entomology 2: 1283-1290.
53. Young, T. P., J. M. Chase, and R. T. Huddleston. 2001. Community succession and assembly: Comparing, contrasting, and combining paradigms in the context of ecological restoration. Ecological Restoration 19: 5-18.
54. Young, T. P., D. A. Peterson, J. J. Clary, and J. Grover. 2005. The ecology of restoration: Historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecology Letters 8: 662-673.