Total Lagrangian Reissner's geometrically exact beam element without singularities

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 70, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1009-1048

  Mäkinen, Jari M ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Finite rotations; Geometrically exact beam; Non linear dynamics; Rotation manifold

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; GEOMETRY; INTEGRATION; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; PARAMETERIZATION; VECTORS;

FINITE ROTATIONS; GEOMETRICALLY EXACT BEAM; LAGRANGIAN REISSNER'S GEOMETRICALLY EXACT BEAM; ROTATION MANIFOLD; STANDARD TIME-INTEGRATION ALGORITHM;

BEAMS AND GIRDERS;

ALGORITHMS; BEAMS AND GIRDERS; GEOMETRY; INTEGRATION; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; PARAMETERIZATION; VECTORS;

EID: 34249680102     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1892     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Belytschko T, Schwer L. Large displacement, transient analysis of space frames. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1977; 11:65-84.
2. Oran C. Tangent stiffness in space frames. Journal of the Structural Division (ASCE) 1973; 99:987-1001.
3. Crisfield MA. A consistent co-rotational formulation for non-linear, three-dimensional, beam elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1990; 81:131-150.
4. Crisfield MA. Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Volume 2: Advanced Topics. Wiley: Chichester, 1997.
5. Avello A, Garcia de Jalon JG. Dynamics of flexible multibody systems using cartesian co-ordinates and large displacement theory. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1991; 32:1543-1563.
6. Rhim J, Lee SW. A vectorial approach to computational modelling of beams undergoing finite rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 41:527-540.
7. Reissner E. On one-dimensional finite-strain beam theory: the plane problem. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics (ZAMP) 1972; 23:795-804.
8. Reissner E. On one-dimensional large-displacement finite-strain beam theory. Studies in Applied Mathematics 1973; 52:87-95.
9. Petrov E, Géradin M. Finite element theory for curved and twisted beams based on exact solutions for three dimensional solids, part I: Beam concept and geometrically exact nonlinear formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 165:43-92.
10. Simo JC. A finite strain beam formulation. The three-dimensional dynamic problem. Part I. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1985; 49:55-70.
11. Simo JC, Vu-Quoc L. A three-dimensional finite rod model. Part II: computational aspects. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1986; 58:79-116.
12. Simo JC, Vu-Quoc L. On the dynamics in space of rods undergoing large motion - a geometrically exact approach. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1988; 66:125-161.
13. Mäkinen J. Critical study of newmark-scheme on manifold of finite rotations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 191:817-828.
14. Cardona A, Géradin M. A beam finite element non-linear theory with finite rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1988; 26:2403-2438.
15. Géradin M, Cardona A. Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach. Wiley: Chichester, 2001.
16. Ibrahimbegović A, Frey F, Kozar I. Computational aspects of vector-like parametrization of three-dimensional finite rotations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1995; 38:3653-3673.
17. Makowski J, Stumpf H. On the 'symmetry' of tangent operators in nonlinear mechanics. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ZAMM) 1995; 75:189-198.
18. Ibrahimbegović A, Al-Mikdad M. Finite rotations in dynamics of beams and implicit time-stepping schemes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1998; 41:781-814.
19. Marsden JE, Ratiu TS. Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry: A Basic Exposition of Classical Mechanical Systems. Springer: New York, 1999.
20. Stuelpnagel J. On the parametrization of the three-dimensional rotation group. SIAM Review 1964; 6:422-430.
21. Ogden RW. Non-Linear Elastic Deformations. Ellis Horwood: Chichester, 1984.
22. Mäkinen J. A formulation for flexible multibody mechanics - Lagrangian geometrically exact beam elements using constraint manifold parametrization. TUT Applied Mechanics and Optimization, Research Report, vol. 3, 2004; 89. http://www.tut.fi/-jmamakin/vk.pdf
23. Stumpf H, Hoppe U. The application of tensor algebra on manifolds to nonlinear continuum mechanics - invited survey article. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (ZAMM) 1997; 77:327-339.
24. Iserles A, Nørsett SP. On the solution of linear differential equations in lie groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A - Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 1999; 357:983-1019.
25. Crisfield MA, Jelenic G. Objectivity of strain measures in the geometrically exact three-dimensional beam theory and its finite element implementation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A - Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 1999; 455:1125-1147.
26. Bathe K-J, Bolourchi S. Large displacement analysis of three-dimensional beam structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1979; 14:961-986.
27. Ibrahimbegović A. A finite element implementation of geometrically nonlinear Reissner's beam theory: three-dimensional curved beam elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1995; 122:11-26.
28. Ibrahimbegović A. On the choice of finite rotation parameters. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1997; 149:49-71.
29. Simo JC, Wong KK. Unconditionally stable algorithms for rigid body dynamics that exactly preserve energy and momentum. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 1991; 31:19-52.
30. Ibrahimbegović A, Mamouri S. On the rigid components and joint constraints in nonlinear dynamics of flexible multibody systems employing 3D geometrically exact beam model. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 188:805-831