HITIQA: Towards analytical question answering

COLING 2004 - Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages

  Small, Sharon ^a   Strzalkowski, Tomek ^a   Liu, Ting ^a   Ryan, Sean ^a   Salkin, Robert ^a   Shimizu, Nobuyuki ^a   Kantor, Paul ^b   Kelly, Diane ^b   Rittman, Robert ^b   Wacholder, Nina ^b  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ADVANCED RESEARCHES; HIGH QUALITY; INFORMATION ANALYSTS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; OPEN DOMAIN QUESTION ANSWERING; QUESTION ANSWERING; QUESTION ANSWERING SYSTEMS; QUESTION ANSWERING TECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH TOOLS; SYSTEM USE;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 34249677251     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Allen, J. and M. Core. 1997. Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers. www.cs.rochester.edu/research/cisd.
2. Buckley, C. 1985. Implementation of the Smart information retrieval system. TR85-686, Computer Science, Cornell University.
3. Ferguson, G. and J. Allen. 1998. TRIPS: An Intelligent Integrated Problem-Solving Assistant. AAAI-98 Conf., pp. 567-573.
4. Fillmore, C. & C. F. Baker. 2001. Frame semantics for text understanding. WordNet Workshop at NAACL.
5. Hardy, H., et al. 2002a. Cross-Document Summarization by Concept Classification. Proceedings of SIGIR, Tampere, Finland.
6. Hardy, H., et al. 2002b. Multi-layer Dialogue Annotation for Automated Multilingual Customer Service. ISLE Workshop, UK.
7. Harabagiu, S., et. al. 2002. Answering Complex, List and Context questions with LCC's Question Answering Server. TREC-10.
8. Hovy, E., et al. 2000. Question Answering in Webclopedia. Notebook. Proceedings of Text Retrieval Conference TREC-9.
9. th Message Under. Conf. (MUC-7.).
10. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Class and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Litman, Diane J. and Shimei Pan. 2002. Designing and Evaluating an Adaptive Spoken Dialogue System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. Vol. 12, No. 2/3, pp. 111-137.
12. Prager, J. et al, 2003. In Question-Answering Two Heads are Better Than One. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, pp 24-31.
13. Seneff, S. and J. Polifroni. 2000. Dialogue Management in the MERCURY Flight Reservation System. ANLP-NAACL 2000.
14. Small et al. 2004. A Data Driven Approach to Interactive Question Answering. In M. Maybury (ed). Future Directions in Automated Question Answering. MIT Press (to appear).
15. Strzalkowski, T and J. Wang. 1996. A self-learning Universal Concept Spotter. Proceedings of COLING-96, pp. 931-936.
16. Walker, M. A. 2002. An Application of Reinforcement Learning to Dialogue Strategy Selection in a Spoken Dialogue System for Email. Journal of AI Research, vol 12., pp. 387-416.
17. Wu, M. et al. 2003. Question Answering by Pattern Matching, Web-Proofing, Semantic Form Proofing. TREC-12.Notebook.