On numerical simulations of subaqueous slides: Back-calculations of laboratory experiments of clay-rich slides

Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 295-300

  Gauer, Pefer ^a   Elverhøi, Anders ^a,b   Issler, Dieter ^a   De Blasio, Fabio V ^a,b  

^a NORWEGIAN GEOTECHNICAL INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW MODELING; FRONTAL FEATURE; LABORATORY METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUBMARINE LANDSLIDE;

EID: 34249674939     PISSN: 0029196X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bryn P, Berg, K., Forberg, C. F., Solheim, A. & Kvalstad, T. 2005: Explaining the Storegga Slide. Marine and Petroleum Geology 22, 11-19.
2. Coussot, P. 1997. Mudflow Rheology and Dynamics. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
3. De Blasio F. V., Engvik, L., Harbitz, C. & Elverhøi, A. 2004:. Hydroplaning and submarine debris flows. Journal of Geophysical Research 109, C01002, doi:10.1029/2002JC001714
4. Elverhøi, A., Issler, D., De Blasio F.V., Ilstad T., C. B. Harbitz, C. B., & Gauer, P. 2005: Emerging insights on the dynamics of submarine debris flows. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 5, 633-648.
5. Ferziger, J. H. & Períc, M. 1999: Computational methods for Fluid Dynamics. 2nd rev. Edition. Heidelberg, Springer.
6. Gauer, P., Kvalstad, T. J., Forsberg, C. F., Bryn, P. & Berg, K. 2005.The last phase of the Storegga Slide: simulation of retrogressive slide dynamics and comparison with slide-scar morphology. Marine and Petroleum Geology 22, 171-178.
7. Harbitz, C. B., Parker, G., Elverhøi, A., Marr, J. G., Mohrig, D. & Harff, P. A. 2003: Hydroplaning of subaqueous debris flows and glide blocks: Analytical solutions and discussion. Journal of Geophysical Research 108, 2349-2366.
8. Ilstad, T., De Blasio, F. V., Elverhøi, A., Harbitz, C. B., Engvik, L., Longva, O. & Marr, J. G. 2004a: On the frontal dynamics and morphology of submarine debris flows, Marine Geology 213, 481-497.
9. llstad, T., Elveøhoi, A., Issler, D. & Marr, J. G. 2004b: Subaqueous debris flow behavior and its dependence on the sand/clay ratio: a laboratory study using particle tracking, Marine Geology 213, 415-138.
10. Ilstad, T., Marr, I. G., Elverhøi, A. & Harbitz, C. B. 2004c: Laboratory studies of subaqueous debris flows by measurements of pore-fluid pressure and total stress, Marine Geology 213, 403-414.
11. Imran, J., Harff, P. & Parker, G. 2001: A numerical model of submarine debris flows with graphical user interface. Computers Geoseience 274, 717-729.
12. Locat, J. & Lee, H. 2002: Submarine landslides: advances and chal lenges Canadian Geotechnical Journal 39, 193-212.
13. Locat, J. & Lee, H. 2005: Subaqueous debris flows. In Jacob, M. & Hungr, O. (Eds.), Debrii flow hazards and related phenomena. Springer and Praxis, 203-245.
14. Locat, J. & Demers, D. 1988. Viscosity, yield stress, remoulded strength, and liquidity Index relationships for sensitive. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 25, 799-806.
15. Mohrig, D., Whipple, K. X., Hondzo, M., Ellis, C. & Parker, G. 1998: Hydroplaning of subaqueous debris flows. Geological Society of America Bulletin 110, 387-394.