Deductivism as an Interpretive Strategy: A Reply to Groarke's Recent Defense of Reconstructive Deductivism

Argumentation and Advocacy

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 168-183

  Godden, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

argument evaluation; argument reconstruction; commitment; deductivism; standards of evidence

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249673638     PISSN: 10511431     EISSN: 25768476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2005.11821627     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Allen, D., (1990). Govier's problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Informal Logic, 12, 43–61.
2. Berg, J., (1987). Interpreting arguments. Informal Logic, 9, 13–21.
3. Bowles, G., (1994). The deductive/inductive distinction. Informal Logic, 16, 159–184.
4. Carroll, L., (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind, 4, 278–280.
5. Copi, I. M., (1982). Introduction to logic (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
6. Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R., (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Fohr, S. D., (1980a). The deductive-inductive distinction. Informal Logic Newsletter, 2(2), 5–8.
8. Fohr, S. D., (1980b). Deductive-inductive: Reply to criticisms. Informal Logic Newsletter, 3(1), 5–10.
9. Fox, J., (1999). Deductivism surpassed. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 77, 447–465.
10. Gerritsen, S., (1994). A defense of deductivism in reconstructing unexpressed premises. In F. H., van Eemeren & R., Grootendorst (Eds.), Studies in pragma-dialectics (pp. 41–47). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
11. Gilbert, M., (1995). Arguments and arguers. Teaching Philosophy, 18, 125–138.
12. Gilbert, M., (1997). Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Godden, D. M., (1998). Commentary on José Plug: Indicators of obiter dicta. In H. V., Hansen, C. W., Tindale, & A. V., Colman (Eds.), Proceedings of the second OSSA conference: Argumentation and rhetoric. St. Catherines, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
14. Govier, T., (1980a). More on deductive and inductive arguments. Informal Logic Newsletter, 2(3), 7–8.
15. Govier, T., (1980b). Addressing arguments: What range of standards? Informal Logic Newsletter, 3(1), 2–4.
16. Govier, T., (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
17. Govier, T., (1992). What is a good argument? Metaphilosophy, 23, 393–409.
18. Groarke, L., (1992). In defense of deductivism: Replying to Govier. In F. H., van Eemeren, R., Grootendorst, J. A., Blair, & C. A., Willard (Eds.), Argumentation illuminated (pp. 113–121). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
19. Groarke, L., (1995). What pragma-dialectics can learn from deductivism, and what deductivism can learn from pragma-dialectics. In F. H., van Eemeren, R., Grootendorst, J. A., Blair, & C. A., Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the third ISSA conference on argumentation: Vol. 2. Analysis and evaluation (pp. 138–145). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
20. Groarke, L., (1999). Deductivism within pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 13, 1–16.
21. Groarke, L., (2002). Johnson on the metaphysics of argument. Argumentation, 16, 277–286.
22. Hitchcock, D., (1980). Deductive and inductive: Types of validity, not types of argument. Informal Logic Newsletter, 2(3), 9–10.
23. Hitchcock, D., (2003). Toulmin's warrants. In F. H., van Eemeren, J. A., Blair, C. A., Willard, & A. F. S., Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation (pp. 69–82). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
24. Johnson, F., (1980). Deductively-inductively. Informal Logic Newsletter, 3(1), 4–5.
25. Johnson, R. H., (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1961). Probability and the logic of rational belief. Middletown, CN: Wesleyan University Press.
27. Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1970). Conjunctivitis. In M., Swain (Ed.), Induction, acceptance arid rational belief (pp. 55–82). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
28. Machina, K. F., (1985). Induction and deduction revisited. Nous, 19, 571–578.
29. Quine, W. V. O., (1960). Word and object Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Skyrms, B., (1986). Choice and chance: An introduction to inductive logic (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31. Stove, D., (1970). Deductivism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 48, 76–98.
32. Toulmin, S. E., (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Vorobej, M., (1992). Defining deduction. Informal Logic, 14, 105–118.
34. Weddle, P., (1979). Inductive, deductive. Informal Logic Newsletter, 2(1), 1–5.
35. Weddle, P., (1980). Good grief! More on induction/deduction. Informal Logic Newsletter, 3(1), 10–12.