Human factors evaluations of Free Flight. Issues solved and issues remaining

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 437-455

  Ruigrok, Rob C J ^a   Hoekstra, Jacco M ^a  

^a NATIONAL AEROSPACE LABORATORY NLR   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Free Flight; Human factors; Real time simulations

Indexed keywords

AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS; AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; AVIONICS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; FLIGHT SIMULATORS;

FREE FLIGHT; HUMAN FACTORS; NUISANCE; REAL-TIME SIMULATIONS;

FLIGHT DYNAMICS;

AIRPLANE CREW; AIRPLANE PILOT; ARTICLE; AVIATION; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; TRAFFIC SAFETY; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 34249660966     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anonymous, 1995. Final Report of RTCA TF3: Free Flight Implementation, RTCA TF3, 1995. RTCA Inc., Washington (Chapter 3).
2. Anonymous, 1998. Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) for Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B). RTCA/DO-242, 19 February 1998, prepared by RTCA SC-186.
3. Anonymous, 1999a. Operational Concept Document (OCD), Eurocontrol. EATCHIP, version 1.1, January 1999.
4. Anonymous, 1999b. North Atlantic (NAT) Region Air Traffic Management (ATM) Concept of Operations. ICAO NAT SPG.
5. Anonymous, 1999c. Report of the NICE Task Force. ICAO NAT IMG.
6. Anonymous, 2001. Principles of Operations for the use of ASAS (PO-ASAS), Action Plan 1. FAA/Eurocontrol Cooperative R&D.
7. Barhydt, R., Warren, A.W., 2002. Development of Intent Information Changes to Revised Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards for Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (RTCA/DO-242A). NASA TM-2002-211669.
8. Daams, J., Bakker, G.J., Blom, H.A.P., 1998. Safety evaluation of an initial free flight scenario with TOPAZ (Traffic Organization and Perturbation AnalyZer). NLR Technical Report.
9. Eby M.S. A self-organizational approach for resolving air traffic conflicts. Lincoln Lab J 7 2 (1994)
10. Harris, R.L., Glover, B.L., Spady, A.A., 1986. Analytic techniques of pilot scanning behavior and their application. NASA Technical Paper 2525.
11. Hilburn, B., Pekela, W., 1999. Free flight and the air traffic controller: results of air-ground integration experiments. SAE World Aviation Congress 1999, paper 1999-01-5563.
12. Hoekstra, J.M., 2001. Designing for safety, the free flight air traffic management concept. NLR-TP-2001-113, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
13. Hoekstra, J.M., van Gent, R.N.H.W., Ruigrok, R.C.J., 1999, Designing for safety: the free flight air traffic management concept. Human Error, Safety & System Design (HESSD) Workshop, Liege, Belgium.
14. Hoekstra J.M., Ruigrok R.C.J., and van Gent R.N.H.W. Free flight in a crowded airspace (2000), Third FAA/Eurocontrol Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, Napoli, Italy
15. Klein Obbink, B., 2003. MFF self separation assurance OHA. MFF R730TR010, edition 1.4.
16. Kuchar, J.K., Yang, L.C., 1997. Survey of conflict detection and resolution modelling methods. AIAA GN&C Conference.
17. Magill S.A.N., and Platt P.A. A fast-time simulation study of shared aircraft intent information (2002), 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Irvine CA USA
18. Ruigrok, R.C.J., 2003. RTS/2 pilot human factors analysis in self-separation simulation trials. MFF Project, D452A.
19. Ruigrok, R.C.J., Valenti Clari, M.S.V., de Nijs, L.J.J., Farges, J.L., Magill, S.A.N., Nuic, A., Shaw, C., 2003. Results of real-time and fast-time simulations. INTENT project, D2-3.
20. Ruigrok, R.C.J., Abma, H.J., Klein Obbink, B., Scholte, J.J., 2004. RTS/3 pilot human factors, training and safety analysis in self-separation simulation trials. MFF Project, D452C.
21. Tole, J.R., Stephens, A.T., Vivaudou, Eprath, A., Young, L.R., 1983. Visual scanning behavior and pilot workload. NASA Contractor Report 3717, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia.
22. Zijlstra, F.R.H., van Doorn, L., 1985. The construction of a scale to measure subjective effort. Technical Report, Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Delft University of Technology.