Acuity and case management: A healthy dose of outcomes, Part I

Professional Case Management

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 132-144

  Huber, Diane L ^a,d   Craig, Kathy ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b Business and Professional Women Canada ^*

^c Business and Professional Women   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE MANAGEMENT; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

CASE MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); UNITED STATES;

EID: 34249651430     PISSN: 15297764     EISSN: 15390675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.PCAMA.0000271363.55428.2d     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Brooten, D., & Naylor, M. D. (1995). Nurses' effect on changing patient outcomes. Image, 27(2), 95-99.
2. Brooten, D., & Youngblut, J. M. (2006). Nurse dose as a concept. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 38(1), 94-99.
3. Cesta, T., & Tahan, H. (2003). The case manager's survival guide: Winning strategies for clinical practice (pp. 254-292). Philadelphia: CV Mosby.
4. Commission for Case Manager Certification. (2005). Code of professional conduct for case managers with standards, rules, procedures, and penalties. Schaumburg, IL: Author. Retrieved October 8, 2006, from http://www.ccmcertification.org/pages/13frame_set.html
5. Commission for Case Manager Certification. (2006). CCM certification guide. Schaumburg, IL: Author. Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://www.ccmcertification.org/pages/4frame_set.html
6. Craig, K. (2005). The Case Management Acuity Tool Kit©. Paper presented at the proceedings of Case Management Society of America, CMSA 15th National Symposium, Orlando, FL. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from http://www.cmsa.org/Portals/0/PDF/Conference/Attendees/ 2005%20Audio%20Recordings%20Order% 20Form.pdf
7. Craig, K. (2006). CM Acuity Tool© and AccuDiff© initiative. (Available from Kathy Craig, MS, RN, CCM, Craig Research Continuum, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3Z2; 613.542.4554; kdcraigrn@earthlink. net)
8. Davies, B., & Logan, J. (1999). Reading research: A userfriendly guide for nurses and other health professionals (pp. 1-19). Ottawa: Canadian Nurses Association.
9. Fisher, L., & van Belle, G. (1993). Biostatistics, a methodology for the health sciences (pp. 897-901). New York: Wiley.
10. Georgiou, A. (2005). Integrated care management: Moving from vision to reality. Paper presented at the proceedings of Case Management Society of America, CMSA 16th Annual Symposium, Grapevine, TX. Retrieved October 9, 2006, from http://www. cmsa. org/Portals/ 0/PDF/Conference/2006/PostConference/ KS01_PPT. pdf
11. Huber, D. L. (2000). The diversity of case management models. Lippincott's Case Management, 5(6), 248-255.
12. Huber, D. L. (2006). Staffing and scheduling. In D. L. Huber (Ed.), Leadership and nursing care management (3rd ed., pp. 713-732). St. Louis: Elsevier.
13. Huber, D. L., Hall, J. A., & Vaughn, T. (2001). The dose of case management interventions. Lippincott's Case Management, 6(3), 119-126.
14. Huber, D. L., Sarrazin, M. V., Vaughn, T., & Hall, J. A. (2003). Evaluating the impact of case management dosage. Nursing Research, 52(5), 276-288.
15. Lindsay, B. (2004). Randomized controlled trials of socially complex nursing interventions: Creating bias and unreliability? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(1), 84-94.
16. Lurie, J. D., & Sox, H. C. (1999). Principles of medical decision making. Spine, 24(5), 493-498.
17. Mastal, M. (2000). Nursing report cards. Nursing Spectrum, 9(3PA), 10.
18. Pink, G. H., & Bolley, H. B. (1994). Physicians in health care management. Part 3: Case mix groups and resource intensity weights: An overview for physicians. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 150(6), 889-894.
19. Powell, S. (2000). Advanced CM, outcomes & beyond. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
20. Prescott, P. (1991). Nursing intensity: Needed today for more than staffing. Nursing Economics, 9(6), 409-414.
21. Prescott, P. A., & Soeken, K. L. (1996). Measuring nursing intensity in ambulatory care. Part I: Approaches to and uses of patient classification systems. Nursing Economics, 14(1), 14-21, 33.
22. Ridgely, M. S., & Willenbring, M. C. (1992). Application of case management to drug abuse treatment: Overview of models and research issues. NIDA Research Monograph, 127, 12-33.
23. Ross, D. (1925). The nicomachean ethics of Aristotle (p. 45). London: Oxford University Press.
24. Sidani, S., & Braden, C. J. (1998). Evaluating nursing interventions: A theory-driven approach. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
25. Tahan, H. A., Huber, D. L., & Downey, W. T. (2006). Case managers' roles and functions: Commission for Case Manager Certification's 2004 research, Part I. Lippincott's Case Management, 11(1), 4-22.
26. Thorndike, E. L. (1918). The nature, purposes, and general methods of measurement of educational products. In S. A. Courtis (Ed.), The measurement of educational products: 17th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pt. 2, pp. 16-24). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
27. Vann, J. (2006). Measuring community-based case management performance: Strategies for evaluation. Lippincott's Case Management, 11(3), 147-157.