Financial support for individual artists

Journal of Arts Management Law and Society

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-42

  Galligan, Ann M ^a   Cherbo, Joni Maya ^b  

^a NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Americans for the Arts   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249353007     PISSN: 10632921     EISSN: 19307799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JAML.34.1.23-42     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Alliance of Artist Communities. 1996. Creativity at risk: A blueprint for action. Seattle: Alliance of Artist Communities.
2. Alliance of Artist Communities. 1999. The programs and management practices of U.S. artists’ communities: A report onresearch conducted by the Alliance of Artists Communitiies, 1997-1999. Seattle: Alliance of Artist Communties.
3. Alper, Neil, and Ann Galligan. 1999. Recession to renaissance: A comparison of Rhode Island artists 1981 and 1997. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 29 (3): 178-203.
4. Alper, Neil, Ann Galligan, and Gregory Wassail. 2000. Policy perspectives for bettering the working conditions of American artists. Unpublished. Washington, DC: Center for Arts and Culture.
5. Alper, Neil, and Gregory Wassall. 1996. Artists in the workforce: Employment and earnings, 1970-1990. NEA, Research Division Report #37. Carson, CA: Seven Locks Press.
6. Alper, Neil, and Gregory Wassall. 2002. More than once in a blue moon: Multiple job holdings by American artists. NEA Research Note #40. Washington, DC: NEA.
7. Cantarella, Gina-Marie, ed. 2000. National guide to funding in arts and culture. 6th ed. New York: Foundation Center.
8. Cherbo, Joni Maya. 2000. National investment in the arts. Background paper for Bruce Seaman. Washington, DC: Center for Arts and Culture.
9. Cherbo, Joni M., and Margaret J. Wyszomirski. 2000. Introduction. In The public life of the arts in America, ed. Joni M. Cherbo and Margaret J. Wyszomirski. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.
11. Davidson, B. 2000. Local art agency facts: Fiscal year 2000. Washington, DC: American for the Arts Monograph.
12. Dunlap, C., K. Liu, and K. Barsdate. 2000. Supporting individual artists: A profile of current state arts agency grants and services. Baltimore: Maryland State Arts Council and the National Association of State Arts Agencies.
13. Edelson, Phyllis, ed. 2001. Foundation grants to individuals. 11th ed. New York: Foundation Center.
14. Florida, Richard. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it is transforming work, leaisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
15. Focke, Anne. 1996. Financial support for artists: A study of past and current support, with reflections on the findings and recommendations for the future. Seattle: Grantmakers in the Arts.
16. Frank, Robert, and Philip J. Cook. 1995. The winner-take-all society. New York: Penguin Books.
17. Galligan, Ann, and Neil Alper. 1998. Characteristics of performing artists: A baseline profile of sectoral crossovers. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 28 (2): 155-77.
18. Galligan, Ann, and Neil Alper. 2000. The career matrix: The pipeline for artists in the United States. In The public life of the arts, ed. J. Cherbo and M. Wyszomirski. Washington, DC: Americans for the Arts.
19. Galligan, Ann, and J. Cherbo. 2003. Financial support for individual artists in the United States. Unpublished report to NEA.
20. Jackson, Maria-Rosario et al. 2003. Investing in creativity: A study of the support structure for U.S. artists comprehensive report and executive summary. Culture, Creativity and Communities Program. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
21. Kunitz, Stanley. 2000. Artists communities: A directory of residencies in the United States that offer time and space for creativity. 2nd ed. Alliance of Artists’ Communities. New York: All worth Press.
22. Learsy, Raymond J. 2002. To encourage great art, help great artists, Editorial/Op Ed, New York Times, December 3.
23. National Endowment for the Arts. 2002. Artist Employment 2001. Research Notes #80. Washington, DC: NEA.
24. Renz, Loren, and Caron Atlas. 1999. Arts funding 2000: Funder perspectives on current and future trends. New York: Foundation Center.
25. Wyszomirski, Margaret J., and Joni Maya Cherbo. 2001. Mapping the association infrastructure of the arts and culture sector. A research report to the Ford Foundation, April, 2001, reproduced in The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 31 (2): 99-122.
26. Wyszomirski, Margaret J., and Randy Cohen. 2002. National and local profiles of cultural support. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Arts Administration and Americans for the Arts.
27. The American Assembly. 1997. The arts and the public purpose. Final report of the 92nd American Assembly. New York: Columbia University.
28. Galligan, Ann. 2001. Creativity, culture, education and the workforce. Washington, DC: The Center for Arts and Culture.
29. Gray, Lois, and Ronald Seeber, eds. 1996. Under the stars: Essays on labor relations in arts and entertainment. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.
30. Healy, Kieran. 2002. What’s new for culture in the new economy. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 32 (2): 86-103.
31. Jeffri, Joan. 1989. Information on artists. New York: Columbia University, Research Center for Arts and Culture.
32. Jeffri, Joan. 1998. Information on artists II. New York: Columbia University, Research Center for Arts and Culture.
33. Mayor’s Office of Cultural Affairs, Artists Foundation, and Boston Health Care for the Homeless. 1994. Artists health care task force: A report to Congress. Boston: Mayor’s Office of Cultural Affairs, Artists Foundation, and Boston Health Care for the Homeless.
34. Peters, Tom. 1999. Reinventing work: The brand you. New York: Alfred Knopf.
35. Throsby, David. 2001. Defining the artist workforce: The Australian experience. Poetics 28: 255-71.
36. Wassail, Gregory, Neil Alper, and R. Davidson. 1983. Art work: Artists in the New England labor market. Cambridge, MA: New England Foundation for the Arts.