The los angeles county response to child abuse and deafness: A social movement theory analysis

American Annals of the Deaf

Volumn 151, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 488-498

  Embry, Richard A ^a   Grossman, Frank D ^b  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249338024     PISSN: 0002726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2007.0003     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Advocacy Council for Abused Deaf Children (1992). Mission, goals, and objectives. Los Angeles: Author.
2. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-39.
3. Binder, A. J. (2002). Contentions curricula: Afrocentrism and creationism in American public schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bonner, B., Crow, S. M., & Hensley, L. D. (1997). State efforts to identify maltreated children with disabilities: A follow-up study. Child Maltreatment, 2(1), 52-60.
5. Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6. Clemens, E. (1993). Organizational repertoires and institutional change: Women's groups and the transformation of U.S. politics, 1890-1920. American Journal of Sociology, 98,755-98.
7. Davies, S. (1999). From moral duty to cultural rights: A case study of political framing in education. Sociology of Education, 72, 1-21.
8. Dejong, G. (1983). Defining and implementing the independent living concept. In N. M. Crewe & I. K. Zola (Eds.), Independent living for physically disabled people: Developing, implementing, and evaluating self-help rehabilitation programs (pp. 4-28). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Edelman, M. (2001). Social movements: Changing paradigms and forms of politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 285-317.
10. Eisenstein, H. (1996). Inside agitators: Australian Femocrats and the state. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11. Embry, R. (1993). Treatment and support of the deaf parent and their children. Unpub-lished training curriculum, Inter-University Consortium, Los Angeles.
12. Embry, R. (2000). An examination of risk factors for the maltreatment of deaf children (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2000). Dissertation Abstracts International, 61, 07.
13. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. Gelles, R. J. (1996). Book of David: How preserving families can cost children's lives. New York: Basic Books.
15. Grossman, F. D. (2005). Dissent from within: How educational insiders use protest to reshape their institution (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 2005). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66, 7.
16. Gustafson, L., & Allen, D. (1994). A new management model for child welfare: True reform means doing things differently. Public Welfare, 52(1), 31-40.
17. Holt, J., & Hotto, S. (1994). Demographic aspects of hearing impairments: Questions and answers (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University, Center for Assessment and Demographic Studies.
18. Katzenstein, M. F. (1998). Faithful and fearless: Moving feminist protest inside the church and military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Kennedy, M. (1992). Not the only way to communicate: A challenge to voice in child protection work. Child Abuse Review, 1(3), 169-77.
20. Kitschelt, H. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Antinuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 57-85.
21. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
22. Knutson, J., & Sullivan, E (1993). Communicative disorders as a risk factor in abuse. Topics in Language Disorders, 13(4), 1-14.
23. Lane, H. (1992). The mask of benevolence: Disabling the Deaf community. New York: Knopf.
24. Lindsey, D. (1994). Welfare of children. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Mansbridge, J. (1995). What is the feminist movement? In M. M. Ferree & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations (pp. 27-34). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26. Mather, S., & Mitchell, R. (1993). Communication abuse: A sociolinguistic perspective. In B. Smith (Ed.), Conference proceedings: Post-Milan ASL and English literacy: Issues, trends, and research (pp. 117-34). Washington, DC: Gallaudet University.
27. McAdam, D. (1999). Politicalprocess and the development of Black insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1996). Introduction: Opportunities, mobilizing structures, and framing process: Toward a synthetic, comparative perspective on social
28. movements. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 1-20). Oxford, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30. McFarland, A. S. (1998). Social movement and theories of American politics. In A. N. Constain & A. S. McFarland (Eds.), Social movements and American political institutions (pp. 7-19). Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.
31. McIntosh, A. R. (1995, February), "your not there yet": The coming of'the deaf education reform through the DPN social movement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Portland, OR.
32. McKentree, M. K. (1995). Deaf and hard of hearing clients: Some legal implications. Social Work, 40(2), 183-87.
33. Meyer, J. W, & Rowan, B. (1983). The structure of educational organizations. In M. W. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and organizations (pp. 78-109). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34. Meyer, J. W, & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In R J. DiMaggio & W. W Powell (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Moore, K. (1999). Political protest and institutional change: The anti-Vietnam War movement and American science. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 97-118). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36. Morris, J. (1999). Disabled children, child protection systems, and the Children Act 1989. Child Abuse Review, 8, 91-108.
37. Oberschall, A. (1973). Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38. Orlin, M. (1995). The Americans With Disabilities Act: Implications for social services. Social Work, 40(2), 233-39.
39. Pecora, P. J., Whittaker, J. K., Maluccio, A. N., & Barth, R. R (2000). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research (2nd ed.). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
40. Reinelt, C. (1995). Moving onto the terrain of the state: The battered women's movement and the politics of engagement. In M. M. Ferree & P. Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations (pp. 81-104). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41. Roberts, D. (2002). Shattered bonds: The color of child welfare. New York: Basic Books.
42. Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2001). Community organizing and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
43. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Handermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tar row (Eds.), International social movement research (pp. 187-218). Greenwich, CT: JEI Press.
44. Spalter-Roth, R., & Schreiber, R. (1995). Outsider issues and insider tactics: Strategic tensions in the women's policy network during the 1980s. In M. M. Ferree & P.Y. Martin (Eds.), Feminist organizations (pp. 105-27). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
45. Sullivan, P. M., & Knutson, J. F. (1998). The association between child maltreatment and disabilities in a hospital-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(4), 271-88.
46. Sullivan, P. M., & Knutson, J. F. (2000). Maltreatment and disabilities: A population-based epidemiological study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(10), 1257-73.
47. Sullivan, P. M., Scanlan, J. M., Brookhouser, P. E., Schulte, L. E., & Knutson, J. F. (1992). The effects of psychotherapy on behavior problems of sexually abused deaf children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16(2), 297-307.
48. Sullivan, P., Vernon, M., & Scanlon, J. (1987). Sexual abuse of deaf youth. American Annals of the Deaf, 132(4), 256-62.
49. Tran, V (2006). Serving the Deaf community in Los Angeles County: The DCFS Deaf Unit. Impact, 19(1), 33. Retrieved December 11, 2006, from http://ici.umn.edu/products/impact/191/191.pdf
50. Ülgen, S., & Petal, M. (1992). Estimated needs of deaf children for child protective services in Los Angeles County. In ICAN data analysis report for 1992 (pp. 55-58). El Monte, CA: Los Angeles County Inter-Agency Council on Child Abuse and Neglect.
51. U.S. Census Bureau (2006a). Population finder: Los Angeles County, California. Retrieved December 17, 2006, from http://fectfinder.census.gov/ servlet/SAFFPopulation?_event= Search&_name; eqlos+angeles+ county&_ state=&_county=los+angeles+county &_ cityTown=los+angeles+coun ty&_zip=&_ sse=on&_lang=en&pctxt=fph
52. U.S. Census Bureau. (2006b). State and county quick/acts: Los Angeles County, California. Retrieved August 18, 2006, from http:// quickfects.census.gov/qfd/states/06/06037.html
53. Waldfogel, J. (1998). Future of child protection: How to break the cycle of abuse and neglect. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54. Weil, M. O., & Gamble, D. N. (1995). Community practice models. In R. L. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social work (19th ed., pp. 577-93). Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press.
55. Westat, Inc. (1993). A report on the maltreatment of children with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.
56. Zald, M. N. (1996). Culture, ideology, and strategic framing. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements (pp. 260-74). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.