Access control in new network environment

Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 955-966

  Lin, Chuang ^a   Feng, Fu Jun ^a,b   Li, Jun Shan ^b  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ROCKET FORCE UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING   (China)

Author keywords

DAC (discretionary access control); MAC (mandatory access control); RBAC (role based access control); Trust model

Indexed keywords

INTERNET; WIRELESS NETWORKS;

DISCRETIONARY ACCESS CONTROL (DAC); MANDATORY ACCESS CONTROL (MAC); PEER TO PEER; ROLE BASED ACCESS CONTROL (RBAC); TRUST MODEL; USAGE CONTROL;

ACCESS CONTROL;

EID: 34249292685     PISSN: 10009825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1360/jos180955     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Lampson BW. Protection. Operating System Rev., 1974,8(1):18-24.
2. Bell DE, Lapadula LJ. Secure Computer Systems: Mathematical Foundations, Vol. 1. Bedford: The Mitre Corporation, 1973.
3. Harrison MA, Ruzzo WL, Ullman JD. Protection in operating systems. Communications of ACM, 1976,19(8):461-471.
4. Department of Defense. Trusted computer system evaluation criteria (TESEC). Technical Report, DOD 5200.28-STD, 1985.
5. Ferraiolo D, Kuhn DR. Role-Based access control. In: Proc. of the 15th National Computer Security Conf. 1992. 554-563. http://csrc.nist.gov/rbac/ferraiolo-kuhn-92.pdf
6. Sandhu R, Coyne EJ, Feinstein HL, Youman CE. Role-Based access control models. IEEE Computer, 1996,29(2):38-47.
7. Sandhu R, Bhamidipati V, Munawer Q. The ARBAC97 model for role-based administration of roles. ACM Trans. on Information and System Security (TISSEC), 1999,2(1):105-135.
8. Sandhu R, Munawer Q. The ARBAC99 model for administration of roles. In: Proc. of the 15th Annual Computer Security Applications Conf. Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 1999. 229-238. http://www.list.gmu.edu/confrnc/acsac/acsac99(org).pdf
9. Ferraiolo DF, Sandhu R, Gavrila S. Proposed NIST standard for role-based access control. ACM Trans. on Information and Systems Security (TISSEC), 2001,4(3):224-274.
10. Thomas RK, Sandhu RS. Task-Based authentication control (TBAC): A family of models for active an enterprise-oriented authentication management. In: Proc. of the 11th IFIP Conf. on Database Security. California, 1997. 11-13. http://www.list.gmu.edu/confrnc/ifip/i97tbac.pdf
11. Oh S, Park S. Task-Role-Based access control model. Information System, 2003,28(6):533-562.
12. Park J, Sandhu R. Towards usage control models: Beyond traditional access control. In: Proc. of the 7th ACM Symp. on Access Control Models and Technologies. California, 2002. 57-64. http://www.list.gmu.edu/confrnc/sacmat/2002-UCON.pdf
13. Park J, Sandhu R. The UCONABC usage control model. ACM Trans. on Information and System Security, 2004,7(1):128-174.
14. Sandhu R, Park J. Usage control: A vision for next generation access control. In Proc. of the 2nd Int'l Workshop on Mathematical Methods, Models and Architectures for Computer Networks Security. LNCS 2776, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003. 17-31.
15. Condor high throughput computing. 2006. http://www.cs.wise.edu/condor/
16. Legion Research Group of the University of Virginia. Legion, a worldwide virtual computer. 2005. http://legion.virginia.edu/
17. Globus project: Globus toolkit. 2006. http://www.globus.org/
18. Yao H, Hu H, Huang B, Li R. Dynamic role and context-based access control for grid applications. In: Proc. of the 6th Int'l Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Computing: Applications and Technologies. IEEE Computer Society, 2005. 404-406.
19. Luo JZ, Wang XP, Song AB. A semantic access control model for grid sevices. In: Proc. of the 9th Int'l Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design. Coventry: IEEE Press, 2005. 350-355.
20. Ryutov T, Zhou L, Neuman C, Leithead T, Seamons K. Adaptive trust negotiation and access control. In: Proc. of the 10th Symp. on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT 2005). New York: ACM Press, 2005. 139-146.
21. Fenkam P, Dustdar S, Kirda E, Reif G, Gall H. Towards an access control system for mobile peer-to-peer collaborative environments. In: Proc. of the IEEE 11th Int'l Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE 2002). IEEE Computer Society, 2002. 95-102.
22. Kim W, Graupner S, Sahai A. A secure platform for P2P computing in the Internet. In: Proc. of the 35th Hawaii Int'l Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS). Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society, 2002. 3948-3957.
23. Wang Y, Vassileva J. Trust and reputation model in peer-to-peer networks. In: Proc. of the 3rd Int'l Conf. on Peer-to-Peer Computing. IEEE Press, 2003. 150-157.
24. Xing L, Liu L. A reputation-based trust model for peer-to-peer ecommerce communities. In: Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce. New York: ACM Press, 2003. 228-229.
25. Wang Y, Vassileva J. Bayesian network-based trust model in peer-to-peer networks. In: Proc. of the Workshop on 'Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies' at the Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems. LNCS 2872, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003. 23-34.
26. Wang Y, Vassileva J. Bayesian network-based trust model. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int'l Conf. on Web Intelligence. IEEE Computer Society, 2003. 372-378.
27. Li Z, Dong Y, Zhuang L, Huang J. Implementation of secure peer group in peer-to-peer network. In: Proc. of the Information Conf. on Communication Technology (ICCT). IEEE Press, 2003. 192-195.
28. Gummadi A, Yoon JP. Modeling group trust for peer-to-peer access control. In: Proc. of the 15th Int'l Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. IEEE Computer Society, 2004. 971-978.
29. Tran H, Hitchens M, Varadharajan V, Watters P. A trust based access control framework for P2P file-sharing systems. In: Proc. of the 38th Hawaii Int'l Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS). Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
30. Faria DB, Cheriton DR. DoS and authentication in wireless public access networks. In: Proc. of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Wireless Security. New York: ACM Press, 2002. 47-56.
31. Wan ZG, Zhu B, Deng RH, Bao F, Ananda AL. DoS-Resistant access control protocol with identity confidentiality for wireless networks. In: Proc. of the 6th IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conf. IEEE Press, 2005. 1521-1526.
32. Ray I, Yu LJ. Towards a location-aware role-based access control model. In: Proc. of the 1st IEEE Int'l Conf. on Security and Privacy for Emerging Areas in Communications Networks. IEEE Press, 2005. 234-236.
33. Lin C, Peng XH. Research on trustworthy networks. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2005,28(5):751-758 (in Chinese with English abstract).
34. Mcknight D, Chervany N. The meanings of trust. Technical Report, TR94-04, University of Minnesota, 1996.
35. Michiardi P, Molva R. CORE: A collaborative reputation mechanism to enforce node cooperation in mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Proc. of the 6th IFIP Conf. on Communications and Multimedia Security. Portoroz, 2002. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm-id=647802.737297
36. Marti S, Giuli T, Lai K, Baker M. Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Proc. of the 6th Annual Int'l Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking. Boston: ACM Press, 2000. 255-265.
37. Buchegger S, Boudec JL. Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol. In: Proc. of the 3rd ACM Int'l Symp. on Mobile Ah Hoc Networking and Computing. ACM Press, 2002. 226-236.
38. Wang Y, Vassileva J. Bayesian network trust model in peer-to-peer networks. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int'l Workshop on Agents and Peer-to-Peer Computing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2004. 23-34.
39. Adams WJ, Davis NJ. Toward a decentralized trust-based access control system for dynamic collaboration. In: Proc. of the IEEE Workshop on Information Assurance and Security United States Military Academy. West Point: IEEE Press, 2005. 317-324.
40. Griffiths N. Task delegation using experience-based multi-dimensional trust. In: Proc. of the 4th Int'l Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. New York: ACM Press, 2005. 489-496.
41. Srivatsa M, Xiong L, Liu L. TrustGuard: Countering vulnerabilities in reputation management for decentralized overlay networks. In: Proc. of the 14th World Wide Web Conf. New York: ACM Press, 2005. 422-431.
42. Aberer K, Despotovic Z. Managing trust in a peer-to-peer information system. In: Proc. of the 10th Int'l Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management. New York: ACM Press, 2001.
43. Cornelli F, Damiani E, Vimercati SDCD, Paraboschi S, Samarati S. Choosing reputable servents in a P2P network. In: Proc. of the 11th World Wide Web Conf. New York: ACM Press, 2002. 376-386.
44. Kamvar SD, Schlosser MT, Molina HG. The EigenTrust algorithm for reputation management P2P networks. In: Proc. of the 12th Int'l Conf. on World Wide Web. New York: ACM Press, 2003. 640-651.
45. Buchegger S, Boudec JL. A robust reputation system for P2P and mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on the Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems. 2004. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/buchegger04robust.html