Risk analysis on a fuel cell in electric vehicle using the MADS/MOSAR methodology

Process Safety and Environmental Protection

Volumn 85, Issue 3 B, 2007, Pages 241-250

  Bultel, Y ^a   Aurousseau, M ^b   Ozil, P ^a   Perrin, L ^c  

^a LEPMI   (France)

^b Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Industry LGP2 UMR CNRS 5518   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Fuel cell; Hydrogen; MADS MOSAR methodology; Risk analysis; Systemic and deterministic approach

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC ENERGY STORAGE; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; HYDROGEN; INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES; RISK ANALYSIS; THERMAL ENERGY;

MADS/MOSAR METHODOLOGY; POWER DENSITIES; PROTECTION BARRIERS;

FUEL CELLS;

EID: 34249287934     PISSN: 09575820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1205/psep06023     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adamson, K.A. and Pearson, P., 2000, Hydrogen and methanol: a comparison of safety, economics, efficiencies and emissions, J Power Sources, 86: 548-555.
2. Carpenter, A.R., Hinze, C.H., 2004, System safety analysis of hydrogen and methanol vehicle fuels, Process Safety Progress, 23-4: 292-299.
3. Büchel, J.P., Lisse, J.P. and Bernard, S., 2001, Viabilité des piles à combustibles pour l'application automobile, Ann Chim Sci Mat, 26: 43-48.
4. Chalk, S.G., Miller, J.F. and Wagner, F.W., 2000, Challenges for fuel cells in transport applications, J Power Sources, 86: 40-51.
5. Dicks, A.L., 1996, Hydrogen generation from natural gas for fuel cell systems of tomorrow, J Power Sources, 61: 113-124.
6. Höhlein, B., Boe, M., and Bogild-Hansen, J., Bröckerhoff, P., Colsman, G., Emonts, B., Menzer, R., Riedel, E., 1996, Hydrogen from methanol for fuel cells in mobile system: development of a compact reformer, J Power Sources, 61: 143-147.
7. Huang, X., Solasi, R., Zou, Y., Feshler, M., Reifsnider, K., Condit, D., Burlatsky, S. and Madden, T., 2006, Mechanical endurance of polymer electrolyte membrane and PEM fuel cell durability, J Polymer Sc. Part B: Polymer Physics, 44(16): 2346-2357.
8. Junker, M., Bocquet, L., Bendif, M. and Karboviac, D., 2001, L'hydrogène pour le transport sur route: réalisations et développements, Ann Chim Sci Mat, 26: 117-130.
9. Larminie, J. and Dicks, A., 2000, Fuel cell Systems Explained (Wiley Editor, England).
10. Laurent, A., 2003, Sécurité des procédé s (Tec&Doc Lavoisier Editor, Paris, France).
11. Lees, R.P., 1996, Loss prevention in the process industries, (Butterworth-Heinemann Editors, Oxford, England).
12. Maggetto, G. and Van Mierlo, J., 2001, Electric vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles: state of the art and perspectives, Ann Chim Sci Mat, 26: 9-26.
13. Ministère français de l'Ecologie est du Développement Durable, 2005, Arrêté du 29 septembre 2005 relatif à l'évaluation et à la prise en compte de la probabilité d'occurrence, de la cinétique, de l'intensité des effets et de la gravité des conséquences des accidents potentiels dans les études de dangers des installations classées soumises à autorisation. JO n 234, 7 October 2005; France.
14. Ogden, J.M., Steinbugler, M.M. and Kreutz, T.G., 1999, A comparison of hydrogen and gasoline as fuels for fuel cell vehicles: implications for vehicle design and infrastructure development, J Power Sources, 79: 143-168.
15. Périlhon, P., 2000, Elements méthodiques, Phoebus, 12: 31-49.
16. Périlhon, P., 2003. MOSAR présentation de la méthode. Techniques de l'Ingénieur, traité sécurité et gestion des risques, SE4 060, France.
17. Rogers, R.L., 2000, http//www.safetynet.de/EC-projects: 1-50.
18. Tixier, J., Dusserre, G., Salvi, O. and Gaston, D., 2002, Review of 62 risks analysis methodologies of industrial plants, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 15: 291-303.