Sustainable sheep production: Evaluation of effect of temperament on lamb production

Cereal Research Communications

Volumn 35, Issue 2 PART II, 2007, Pages 873-876

  Pajor, Ferenc ^a   Láczó, Edina ^a   Póti, Péter ^a  

^a SZENT ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OVIS ARIES;

EID: 34249102838     PISSN: 01333720     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/CRC.35.2007.2.177     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. st communication: Yield and digestibility of organic matter. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 51, 5. 205-213 pp.
2. nd communication: Crude protein, energy and ergosterol concentration. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 51, 6. 271-277 pp.
3. Burrow H.M.: 1991. Effect of intensive handling of zebu crossbred weaned calves on temperament. Proceedings of the Australian Associations of Animal Breeding and Genetics 9. 208-211 pp.
4. Dobó E. - Fekete F.M. - Kumar S.M. - Szucs I.: 2006. Ecological-economic analysis of climate change on food system and agricultural vulnerability: a brief overview. Cereal Research Communications, Vol. 34 No. 1. 777-781 pp.
5. Ely D.G.: 1994. The role of grazing sheep in sustainable agriculture. Sheep Research Journal, Special Issue. 37-51 pp.
6. Hearnshaw H. - Morris C.A.: 1984. Genetic and environmental effects on a temperament score in beef cattle. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research 35. 723-733 pp.
7. Husti I.: 2006. The main elements of sustainable food chain management. - Cereal Research Communications, Vol. 34. No. 1. 793-797 pp.
8. Fell L.R. - Colditz I.G. - Walker K.H. - Watson D.L.: 1999. Associations between temperament, performance and immune function in cattle entering a commercial feedlot. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 39. 795-802 pp.
9. Fordyce G. - Wythes J.R. - Shorthose W.R.. - Underwood D.W. - Shepherd R.K.: 1988. Cattle temperaments in extensive beef herds in northern Queensland. 2. Effect of temperament on carcass and meat quality. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 28. 6. 689-693 pp.
10. Neindre P.L. - Boivin X. - Boissy A.: 1996. Handling of extensively kept animals. Applied Animal Behavior Science 49. 73-81 pp.
11. Pajor F. - Szenléleki A. - Láczó E. - Póti P. - Tozsér J.: 2006. Relation of some production traits with temperament in Hungarian Merino lambs. Egyptian Journal of Sheep, Goat and Desert Animals Sciences 1. 255- 260 pp.
12. Richard E.: 2005. Sustainable Agriculture: An Introduction ATTRA publication, http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/sustagintro.html
13. Szemán L. - Barcsák Z. - Tasi, J.: 2004. Gyepalkotó fajok és fajták válogatási sorrendje, anyajuhok legelési viselkedése alapján. Állattenyé sztés és Takarmányozás, 53. 4. 385-393 pp.
14. Tasi J. - Barcsák Z. - Kispál T. - Szemán L.: 2004. Legelo állatok takarmányválogatási viselkedése. Állattenyésztés és Takarmányozás, 53. 4. 373-383 pp.
15. Tarnawa Á. - Klupács H.: 2006. Element and energy transport model for an agricultural site. - Cereal Research Communications, Vol. 34 No. 1. 85-89 pp.
16. Trillat G. - Boissy A. - Boivin X. - Monin G. - Sapa J. - Mormende P. - Neindre P. L.: 2000. Relations entre le bien-etre des bovines et les caracteristiques de la viande (Rapport definitif-Juin). INRA, Theix, France, 1-33 pp.
17. Walker J.W.: 1994. Multispecies grazing: The ecological advantage. Sheep Research Journal, Special Issue. 52-64 pp.
18. Wells A. - Gegner L.E. - Earles R.: 2000. Sustainable sheep production. ATTRA publication, http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/sheep.html