Burlap bands as a sampling technique for green anoles (Anolis carolinensis) and other reptiles commonly found on tree boles

Herpetological Review

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 427-428

  Horn, Scott ^a   Hanula, James L ^a  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANOLIS CAROLINENSIS; REPTILIA;

EID: 34249100993     PISSN: 0018084X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BAUER, A. M., AND R. A. SADLIER. 1992. The use of mouse glue traps to capture lizards in trees and rock crevices. Herpetol. Rev. xx:xx-xx.
2. BEDFORD, G. S., K. CHRISTIAN, AND B. BARRETTE. 1995. A method for catching lizards in trees and rock crevices. Herpetol. Rev. xx:xx-xx.
3. CAMPBELL, H. W., AND S. P. CHRISTMAN. 1982. Field techniques for herpetofaunal community analysis. In N. J. Scott, Jr. (ed.), Herpetological Communities, pp. 193-200. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wildlife Res. Rep. 13, Washington, D.C.
4. CAMPBELL, R. W., AND R. J. SLOAN. 1977. Release of gypsy moth populations from innocuous levels. Environ. Entomol. 6:323-330.
5. DOWNES, S., AND P. BORGES. 1998. Sticky traps: An effective way to capture small terrestrial lizards. Herpetol. Rev. 29:94-95.
6. DURDEN, L. A., E. M. DOTSON, AND G. N. VOGEL. 1995. Two efficient techniques for catching skinks. Herpetol. Rev. 26:137.
7. DURTSCHE, R. D. 1996. A capture technique for small, smooth-scaled lizards. Herpetol. Rev. 27:12-13.
8. ESTRADA-RODRIGUEZ, J. L., S. V. LEYVA PACHECO, AND H. L. CORRUJEDO. 2004. A new capture technique for the Coahuila fringe-toed lizard (Uma exsul) and other desert lizards. Herpetol. Rev. 35:244-245.
9. FAIR, S. W., AND S. E. HENKE. 1997. Efficacy of capture methods for a low density population of Phrynosoma cornutum. Herpetol. Rev. 28:135-137.
10. GREENBERG, C. H., D. G. NEARY, AND L. D. HARRIS. 1994. A comparison of herpetofaunal sampling effectiveness of pitfall, single-ended and double-ended funnel traps used with drift fences. J. Herpetol. 28:319-324.
11. HORN, G. S. 2000. Relationship of coarse woody debris to red-cockaded woodpecker prey diversity and abundance. M.S. Thesis, University of Georgia.
12. KARNS, D. R. 1986. Field herpetology. Methods for the study of amphibians and reptiles in Minnesota. Occas. Pap. James Ford Bell Mus. Nat. Hist. 18:1-18.
13. MIZELL, R. F. III, AND D. E. SCHIFFHAUER. 1987. Trunk traps and overwintering predators in pecan orchards: survey of species and emergence times. Florida Entomol. 70:238-244.
14. MOSELEY, K. R. 2004. Response of herpetofauna and soricids to coarse woody debris manipulations in upland loblolly pine stands. M.S. Thesis, University of Georgia.
15. NEW, T. R. 1967. Trap-banding as a collecting method for Neuroptera and their parasites and some results obtained. Entomol. Gazette 18:37-45.
16. SIMMONS, J. E. 1987. Herpetological collecting and collections management. SSAR Herpetol. Circ. 16:1-70.
17. STRONG, D., B. LEATHERMAN, AND B. H. BRATTSTROM. 1993. Two new methods for catching small fast lizards. Herpetol. Rev. 24:22-23.
18. SUTTON, P. E., H. R. MUSHINSKY, AND E. D. MCCOY. 1999. Comparing the use of pitfall drift fences and cover boards for sampling the threatened sand skink (Neoseps reynoldsi). Herpetol. Rev. 30:149-151.
19. WHITING, M. J. 1998. Increasing lizard capture success using baited glue traps. Herpetol. Rev. 29:34.
20. ZANI, P. A., AND L. J. VITT. 1995. Techniques for capturing arboreal lizards. Herpetol. Rev. 26:136-137.