Impaction allograft with cement for the revision of the femoral component. A minimum 39-month follow-up study with the use of the Exeter stem in Asian hips

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 297-302

  Yim, Soo Jae ^a   Kim, Min Young ^a   Suh, Yoo Sung ^b  

^a University of Soonchunhyang   (South Korea)

^b Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMIKACIN; BONE CEMENT; CEFAZOLIN; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE ALLOGRAFT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SOUTH KOREA; THROMBOSIS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; BONE REMODELING; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KOREA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION;

EID: 34249100021     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0201-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip; theory and practice. Springer, New York
2. Chiu KH, Shen WY, Cheung KW, Tsui HF (2005) Primary Exeter total hip arthroplasty in patients with small femurs: a minimum of 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty 20:275-281
3. Eldridge JD, Smith EJ, Hubble MJ, Whitehouse SL, Learmonth ID (1997) Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. J Arthroplasty 12:535-540
4. Elting JJ, Mikhail WE, Zicat BA, Hubbell JC, Lane LE, House B (1995) Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplsty. Clin Orthop 319:159-167
5. Engelbrecht E, Heinert K (1987) Klassifikation und Behandlungscrichtlinien von Knochensubstanzverlusten bei Revisionsoperationen am Hüftgelenk-mittelfristige Ergebnisse. In: Primar- und Revisions- alloarthroplastik, Huft- und Kniegelenk: 10 Jahre Endo-klinik Hamburg. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 189-201
6. Fawcett KJ, Barr HR (1987) Tissue banking. American Association of Blood Banks, Arlington, VA
7. Fetzer GB, Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC (2001) Impaction allografting with cement for extensive femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery: a 4- to 8-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 16:195-202
8. Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJ, Ling RS (1988) Experience with the Exeter total hip replcament since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 19:477-489
9. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J (1993) Impacted cancellous allograft and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75:14-21
10. Giesen EB, Lamerights NM, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Huiskes R (1999) Mechanical characteristics of impacted morsellised bone grafts used in revision of total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 81:1052-1057
11. Gore DR (2002) Impaction bone grafting for total hip revision. Int Orthop 26:162-165
12. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 141:17-27
13. Holliday BR, English HW, Timperley AJ, Gie GA, Ling RS (2003) Femoral impaction grafting with cement in revision total hip replacement. Evolution of the techniques and results. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 85:809-817
14. Malchau H, Karrholm J, Wang YX, Herberts P (1995) Accuracy of migration analysis in hip arthroplasty. Digitized and conventional radiography, compared to radiostereometry in 51 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66:418-424
15. Masterson EL, Masri BA, Duncan CP (1997) The cement mantle in the Exeter impaction allografting technique. A cause for concern. J Arthroplasty 12:759-764
16. Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1997) Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty. A minimum 2-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 79A:1834-1841
17. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M (1954) Functional results of hip arthroplasy with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 36:451-475
18. Mikhail WE, Wretenberg PF, Weidenhielm LR, Mikhail MN (1999) Complex cemented revision using polished stem and morselized allograft. Minimum 5-years' follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:288-291
19. Nelissen RG, Bauer TW, Weidenhielm LR, LeGolvan DP, Mikhail WE (1995) Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 77:412-422
20. Ornstein E, Atroshi I, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Sandquist P, Sundberg M (2006) Early complications after 144 consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84:1323-1328
21. Ornstein E, Franzen H, Johnsson R, Karlsson MK, Linder L, Sundberg M (2004) Hip revision using the Exeter stem, impacted morselized allograft bone and cement: a consecutive 5-year radiostereometric and radiographic study in 15 hips. Arch Orthop Scand 75:533-543
22. Simon JP, Fowler JL, Gie GA, Ling RS, Timperley AJ (1991) Impaction cancellous grafting of the femur in cemented total hip revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73(Suppl 1):73
23. Schmalzried TP, Harris WH (1993) Hybrid total hip replacement. A 6.5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 75:608-615
24. Schreurs BW, Arts JJ, Verdonschot N, Buma P, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW (2005) Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87:2499-2507
25. van Biezen FC, ten Have BL, Verhaar JA (2000) Impaction bone-grafting of severely defective femora in revision total hip surgery: 21 hips followed for 41-85 months. Arch Orthop Scand 71:135-142