Vendor bidding on online auctions: Protecting consumers from vendor bidding on New Zealand online auctions

Journal of Consumer Policy

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 137-150

  Tokeley, Kate ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

New Zealand; Online auctions; Protecting consumers; Vendor bidding

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249094745     PISSN: 01687034     EISSN: 15730700     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10603-007-9033-6     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Carlton, J., & Bensinger, K. (2000). Phony bids put eBay on the defensive. Wall Street Journal, May 24, B1.
2. Dawson, F., & McLauchlan, D. (1981). The Contractual Remedies Act 1979. Auckland, NZ: Sweet & Maxwell.
3. Federal Trade Commission (2003). National and state trends in fraud and identity theft: January-December 2002. (Retrieved from http://www.consumer.gov/sentinel/pubs/Top10Fraud_2002.pdf).
4. Garner, B. A. (Ed.) (2004). Black's law dictionary (8th ed.). Eagan, MN: West Group.
5. Hynes, S. T. (2003). Stopping another phantom menace: Using the commerce clause to force states to police online auction shill bidding or face congressional mandates. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 5, 763-802.
6. Trevathan, J., & Read, W. (2006). Detecting collusive shill bidding. James Cook University, North Queensland, Australia, available at http://auction.maths.jcu.edu.au/research/collusive.pdf.