Tailor-made split-plot designs for mixture and process variables

Journal of Quality Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 326-339

  Goos, Peter ^a,c   Donev, Alexander N ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c American Society for Quality   (India)

^d Department of Mathematics ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

A optimality; D optimality; G optimality; Mixture experiment; Pure error estimation; Replication; Response surface designs; Split plot experiment; V optimality

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; QUALITY CONTROL;

A-OPTIMALITY; D-OPTIMALITY; G-OPTIMALITY; MIXTURE EXPERIMENT; PURE ERROR ESTIMATION; REPLICATION; RESPONSE SURFACE DESIGNS; SPLIT PLOT EXPERIMENT; V-OPTIMALITY;

PROCESS DESIGN;

EID: 34249090385     PISSN: 00224065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2007.11917699     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. BINGHAM, D. R.; SCHOEN, E. D.; and SITTER, R. R. (2004). "Designing Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Experiments with Few Whole-Plot Factors". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C 53, pp. 325-339; Corrigendum, 54, pp. 955-958.
2. BINGHAM, D. and SITTER, R. R. (1999a). "Some Theoretical Results for Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs". Annals of Statistics 27, pp. 1240-1255.
3. BINGHAM, D. and SITTER, R. R. (2001). "Design Issues in Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 2-15.
4. BINGHAM, D. and SITTER, R. R. (2003). "Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs for Robust Parameter Experiments". Technometrics 45, pp. 80-89.
5. BINGHAM, D. and SITTER, R. R. (1999b). "Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Fractional Factorial Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 41, pp. 62-70.
6. q-r Split Plot Experiments". Journal of Quality Technology 32, pp. 39-56.
7. k-p × s Prototype Experiments". Technometrics 39, pp. 52-62.
8. CHIPMAN, H.; HAMADA, M.; and WU, C. F J. (1997). "A Bayesian Variable Selection Approach for Analyzing Designed Experiments with Complex Aliasing". Technometrics 39, pp. 372-381.
9. CORNELL, J. A. (1988). "Analyzing Data from Mixture Experiments Containing Process Variables: A Split-Plot Approach". Journal of Quality Technology 20, pp. 2-23.
10. CORNELL, J. A. (2002). Experiments with Mixtures: Designs, Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data. New York, NY: Wiley.
11. CORNELL, J. A. and GORMAN, J. W. (1994), "Fractional Design Plans for Process Variables in Mixture Experiments". Journal of Quality Technology 16, pp. 20-38.
12. CZITROM, V. (1989). "Mixture Experiments with Process Variables: D-Optimal Orthogonal Experimental Plans". Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 17, pp. 105-121.
13. CZITROM, V. (1989). "Experimental Designs for Four Mixture Components with Process Variables". Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 18, pp. 4561-4581.
14. GANJU, J. and LUCAS, J. M. (1997). "Bias in Test Statistics When Restrictions in Randomization Are Caused by Factors". Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 26, pp. 47-63.
15. GILMOUR, S. G. and GOOS, P. (2006). "Bayesian Analysis of Data from Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs". Working Paper 2006/005, Faculty of Applied Economics, Universiteit Antwerpen.
16. GOOS, P. (2002). The Optimal Design of Blocked and Splitplot Experiments. New York, NY: Springer.
17. GOOS, P. (2006). "Optimal Versus Orthogonal and EquivalentEstimation Design of Blocked and Split-Plot Experiments". Statistica Neerlandica 60, pp. 361-378.
18. GOOS, P. and DONEV, A. N. (2006). "The D-Optimal Design of Blocked Experiments with Mixture Components". Journal of Quality Technology 38, pp. 319-332.
19. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2001). "Optimal Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 33, pp. 436-450.
20. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2003). "D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs with Given Numbers and Sizes of Whole Plots". Technometrics 45, pp. 235-245.
21. GOOS, P. and VANDEBROEK, M. (2004). "Outperforming Completely Randomized Designs". Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 12-26.
22. HUANG, P.; CHEN, D.; and VOELKEL, J. (1998). "Minimum-Aberration Two-Level Split-Plot Designs". Technometrics 40, pp. 314-326.
23. JONES, B. and GOOS, P. (2007). "A Candidate-Set-Free Algorithm for Generating D-Optimal Split-Plot Designs". Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series C: Applied Statistics 56, pp. 347-364.
24. KOWALSKI, S.; CORNELL, J. A.; and VINING, G. G. (2000). "A New Model and Class of Designs for Mixture Experiments with Process Variables". Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 29, pp. 2255-2280.
25. KOWALSKI, S. M. (2002). "24 Run Split-Plot Experiments for Robust Parameter Design", Journal of Quality Technology 34, pp. 399-410.
26. KOWALSKI, S. M.; CORNELL, J. A.; and VINING, G. G. (2002). "Split-Plot Designs and Estimation Methods for Mixture Experiments with Process Variables". Technometrics 44, pp. 72-79.
27. LETSINGER, J. D.; MYERS, R. H.; and LENTNER, M. (1996). "Response Surface Methods for Bi-Randomization Structures". Journal of Quality Technology 28, pp. 381-397.
28. LITTELL, R. C.; MILLIKEN, G. A.; STROUP, W. W.; and WOLFINGER, R. D. (1996). SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
29. SNEE, R. D. (1975). "Experimental Designs for Quadratic Models in Constrained Mixture Spaces". Technometrics 17, pp. 149-159.
30. TRINCA, L. A. and GILMOUR, S, G. (2001). "Multi-Stratum Response Surface Designs". Technometrics 43, pp. 25-33.
31. VINING, G. G.; KOWALSKI, S. M.; and MONTGOMERY, D. C. (2005), "Response Surface Designs Within a Split-Plot Structure". Journal of Quality Technology 37, pp. 115-128.
32. WEBB, D.; LUCAS, J. M.; and BORKOWSKI, J, J. (2004), "Factorial Experiments When Factor Levels Are Not Necessarily Reset". Journal of Quality Technology 36, pp. 1-11.