|
Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 275-278
|
The Motion: A Robot is Needed to Perform the Best Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy
[No Author Info available]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
CORPUS CAVERNOSUM;
ENDOSCOPY;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
PENIS ERECTION;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROPRIOCEPTION;
PROSTATECTOMY;
ROBOTICS;
SURGEON;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TISSUE PRESERVATION;
URINE INCONTINENCE;
CONVALESCENCE;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
INNERVATION;
INSTRUMENTATION;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
PENIS;
PERIPHERAL NERVE;
PHYSIOLOGY;
PROSTATE TUMOR;
REVIEW;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
HUMANS;
LAPAROSCOPY;
MALE;
PENILE ERECTION;
PENIS;
PERIPHERAL NERVES;
PROSTATECTOMY;
PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;
RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;
ROBOTICS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 34249083798
PISSN: 03022838
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.025 Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (0)
|