Androgenetic haploids and SSR markers as tools for the development of tropical maize hybrids

Euphytica

Volumn 156, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 95-102

  Belicuas, Pedro Radi ^a   Guimarães, Claudia Teixeira ^b   Paiva, Luciano Vilela ^a   Duarte, Jair Moura ^c   Maluf, Wilson Roberto ^a   Paiva, Edilson ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF LAVRAS   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA MILHO E SORGO   (Brazil)

^c Syngenta Seeds Ltd   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Androgenetic haploid; Indeterminate gametophyte; Microsatellite; Zea mays L.

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 34249082580     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: 15735060     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9356-z     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barbosa AMM, Geraldi IO, Benchimol LL, Garcia AAF, Souza Jr CL, Souza AP (2003) Relationship of intra- and interpopulation tropical maize single cross hybrid performance and genetic distances computed from AFLP and SSR markers. Euphytica 130:87-99
2. Beckert M (1994) Advantages and disadvantages of the use of in vitro/in situ produced DH maize plants. In: Bajaj YPS (eds) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 25 Maize. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp201-213
3. Bernardo R (1995) Genetic models for predicting maize single-cross performance in unbalanced yield trial data. Crop Sci 35:141-147
4. Bernardo R (1996a) Best linear unbiased prediction of maize single-cross performance. Crop Sci 36:50-56
5. Bernardo R (1996b) Best linear unbiased prediction of the performance of crosses between untested maize inbreds. Crop Sci 36:872-876
6. Bylich VG, Chalyk ST (1996) Existence of pollen grains with a pair of morphologically different sperm nuclei as a possible cause of the haploid-inducing capacity in ZMS line. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 70:33
7. Carvalho CR (1995) Desenvolvimento de tecnologia citogenética em milho (Zea mays L.). Federal University of Viçosa: Viçosa, 127 p. Ph.D. Thesis
8. Chalyk ST (1999) Creating new haploid-inducing lines of maize. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 73:53-54
9. Charcosset A, Bonnisseau B, Touchebeuf O, Burstin J, Dubreil P, Barriére Y, Gallais A, Dennis JB (1998) Prediction of maize silage performance using marker data: comparison of several models for specific combining ability. Crop Sci 38:38-44
10. Chase SS (1963) Androgenesis, its use for transfer of maize cytoplasm. Heredity 54:152-158
11. Coe EH (1959) A line of maize with high haploid frequency. Amer Naturalist 93:381-382
12. Coe EH (1994) Anthocyanin genetics. In: Freeling M, Walbot V (eds) The maize handbook. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 279-281
13. Eder J, Chalyk S (2002) In vivo haploid induction in maize. Theor Appl Genet 104:703-708
14. Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbreed lines. Maydica 35:1-16
15. Kato A (2002) Chromosome doubling of haploid maize seedlings using nitrous oxide gas at the flower primordial stage. Plant Breeding 121:370-377
16. Kermicle JL (1969) Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maize. Science 166:1422-1424
17. Kermicle JL (1971) Pleiotropic effects on seed development of the indeterminate gametophyte gene in maize. Am J Bot 58:1-7
18. Kindiger B, Hamann S (1993) Generation of haploids in maize: a modification of the indeterminate gametophyte (ig) system. Crop Sci 33:342-344
19. Lashermes P, Gaillard A, Beckert M (1988) Gynogenetic haploid plants analysis for agronomic and enzymatic markers in maize (Zea mays L.). Theor Appl Genet 76:570-572
20. Lee M, Godshalk EB, Lamkey KR, Woodman WW (1989) Association of restriction fragment length polymorphism among maize inbreds with agronomic performance of their crosses. Crop Sci 29:1067-1071
21. Loureiro J, Santos C (2004) Aplicação da citometria de fluxo ao estudo do genoma vegetal. Bol Biotech 77:18-29
22. Lübberstedt T, Melchinger AE, Duble C, Vuylsteke M, Kuiper M (2000) Relationship among early European maize inbreds: IV. Genetic diversity revealed with AFLP markers and comparison with RFLP, RAPD, and pedigree data. Crop Sci 40:783-791
23. Mahendru A, Sarkar KR (2000) Cytological analysis of the pollen of haploid inducer lines in maize. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 60:37-43
24. Miranda Filho JB, Viégas GP (1987) Milho híbrido. In: Paterniani E, Viégas GP (eds) Melhoramento e Produção do Milho. Fundação Cargill, Campinas, pp 277-340
25. Nanda DK, Chase SS (1966) An embryo marker for detecting monoploids of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci 6:213-215
26. Ninamango-Cárdenas FE, Guimarães CT, Martins PR, Parentoni SN, Carneiro NP, Lopes MA, Moro JR, Paiva E (2003) Mapping QTLs for aluminum tolerance in maize. Euphytica 130:223-232
27. Paterniani E, Campos MS (1999) Melhoramento do milho. In: Borém A (eds) Melhoramento das Espécies Cultivadas. Editora UFV, Viçosa, pp 429-486
28. Pinto RMC, Souza Jr CL, Carlini-Garcia LA, Garcia AAF, Souza AP (2003) Comparison between molecular markers and diallel crosses in the assignment of maize lines to heterotic groups. Maydica 48:63-73
29. Rotarenco VA (2000) The comparative characteristic of the correlation between the traits of maize diploids and haploids. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 74:14-15
30. Rotarenco VA, Eder J (2003) Possible effects of heterofertilization on the induction of maternal haploids in maize. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 77:30
31. Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KA, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW (1984) Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:8014-8018
32. Shatskaya OA, Zabirova ER, Shcherbak VS, Chumak MV (1994) Mass induction of maternal haploids in corn. Maize Genet Coop Newsl 68:51
33. 1 heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80:833-840
34. Sokal RR, Michener CD (1958) A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 38:1409-1438
35. Sprague GF, Dudley JW (1988) Corn and corn improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Maidson
36. Viccini LF (1998) Variações cromossômicas induzidas por radiação gama em milho (Zea mays L.) via grão de pólen. Federal University of Viçosa: Viçosa, 145 p. Ph.D. Thesis