Swapping stories: Comparing plots: Triangulating individual narratives within families

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 121-134

  Warin, Jo ^a   Solomon, Yvette ^a   Lewis, Charlie ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249080310     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570701334068     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Bernard, J. (1972). The future of marriage. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
2. Bernardes, J. (1997). Family studies: An introduction. London: Routledge.
3. Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences (3rd edn). New York and London: Routledge.
4. Chambers, D. (2001). Representing the family. London: Sage.
5. Collier, A. (1994). Critical realism: An introduction to Roy Bhaskar's philosophy. New York and London: Verso.
6. Denzin, N. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Edwards, R., Gillies, V., & Ribbens, J. (1999). Shifting boundaries and power in the research process: The example of researching step-families. In J. Seymour, & P. Bagguley (Eds), Relating intimacies: Power and resistance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
8. Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
9. Gillies, V., Ribbens McCarthy, J., & Holland, J. (2001). Pulling together, pulling apart: The family lives of young people. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
10. Goodson, I., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life history research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.
11. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Harding, S. (1987). Feminism and methodology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana State Press and Open University Press.
13. Harding, S. (1990). Feminism, science and the anti-Enlightenment critiques. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Harding, S. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is strong objectivity?' In L. Alcoff, & E. Potter (Eds), Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
15. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.
16. Langford, W., Lewis, C., Solomon, Y., & Warin J. (2001). Understanding families? Closeness, authority and independence in mothers, fathers and 11-16 year olds. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.
17. Larson, R., & Richards, M. (1994) Divergent realities. New York: Basic Books.
18. Morgan, D. (1998). Risk and family practices: Accounting for change and fluidity in family life. In E. B. Silva, & C. Smart (Eds), The new family? London: Sage.
19. Perlesz, A., & Lindsay, J. (2003). Methodological triangulation in researching families: Making sense of dissonant data. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 25-40.
20. Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Continuum.
21. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Ribbens McCarthy, J., Holland, J., & Gillies, V. (2003) Multiple perspectives on the 'family' lives of young people: Methodological and theoretical issues in case study research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 1-23.
23. Roberts, H. (1981). Doing feminist research. London and Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
24. Scott, J. (1997). Changing households in Britain: Do families still matter? The Sociological Review, 45(4), 591-620.
25. Smart, C., & Neale B. (1999). Family fragments? Cambridge: Polity Press.
26. Song, M. (1998). Hearing competing voices: Sibling research. In J. Ribbens, & R. Edwards (Eds), Feminist dilemmas in qualitative methods: Public knowledge and private lives. London: Sage.
27. Thapar-Bjorket, S., & Henry, M. (2004). Reassessing the research relationship: Location, position and power in fieldwork accounts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(5), 363-381.
28. Warin, J., Solomon, Y., Lewis, C., & Langford, W. (1999). Fathers, work, and family life. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.