Sensitivity and uncertainty in flood inundation modelling - Concept of an analysis framework

Advances in Geosciences

Volumn 11, Issue , 2007, Pages 31-36

  Weichel, T ^a   Pappenberger, F ^b   Schulz, K ^a  

^a HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^b EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM RANGE WEATHER FORECASTS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; FLOOD; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LAND USE; LEGISLATION; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CENTRAL EUROPE; ELBE RIVER; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

EID: 34249077386     PISSN: 16807340     EISSN: 16807359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/adgeo-11-31-2007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Apel, H., Thieken, A. H., Merz, B., and Blöschl, G.: Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 4, 295-308, 2004, http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/295/2004/.
2. Aronica, G., Bates, P. D., and Horritt, M. S.: Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary information within GLUE, Hydrol. Processes, 16, 2001-2016, 2002.
3. Bates, P. D., Wilson, M. D., Horrit, M. S., Mason, D. C., Holden, N., and Currie, A.: Reach scale floodplain inundation dynamics observed using airborne synthetic aperture radar imagery: Data analysis and modelling, J. Hydrol., 328, 306-318, 2006.
4. Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Wasserhaushaltsgesetz (WHG), Letzte Änderung durch: 25. Juni 2005 (BGBl. I S. 1746, 1756), 2005.
5. Casulli, V.: Semi-implicit finite difference methods for the two-dimensional shallow water equations, Journal of Computational Physics, 86(1), 56-74, 1990.
6. Cheng, R. T., Casulli, V., and Gartner, J. W.: Tidal, Residual, Intertidal Mudflat (TRIM) Model and its applications to San Francisco Bay, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 36, 235-280, 1993.
7. Crosetto, M., Tarantola, S., and Saltelli, A.: Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 81, 71-79, 2000.
8. DKKV: Flood risk reduction in Germany, DKKV publication, 29e, 2004.
9. Fulford, J. M.: Computational Technique and Performance of Transient Inundation Model for Rivers - 2 Dimensional, USGS Open-File Report 03-371, 2003.
10. Hengl, T.: Finding the right pixel size, Computer & Geosciences, 32, 1283-1298, 2006.
11. Hunter, N. M.: Utility of different data types for calibrating flood inundation models within a GLUE framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 412-430, 2005, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/9/412/2005/.
12. Pappenberger, F., Beven, K., Horritt, M., and Blazkova, S.: Uncertainty in the calibration of effective roughness parameters in HEC-RAS using inundation and downstream level observations, J. Hydrol., 302, 46-69, 2005.
13. Pappenberger, F., Frodsham, K., Beven, K., Romanowicz, R., and Matgen, P.: Fuzzy set approach to calibrating distributed flood inundation models using remote sensing observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11, 739-752, 2007, http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/739/2007/.
14. Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, E. M.: Sensitivity analysis, Wiley, 2002.
15. Sobol, I. M.: Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models, Math. Model. Comput. Exp, 1, 407-414, 1993.
16. USGS: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2004/3060/pdf/fs20043060.pdf, 11.04.2007.
17. Werner, M. G. F., Hunter, N. M., and Bates, P. D.: Identifiability of distributed floodplain roughness values in flood extent estimation, J. Hydrol., 314, 139-157, 2005.