Anti-agreement, anti-locality and minimality. The syntax of dislocated subjects

Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 403-446

  Schneider Zioga, Patricia ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

A' dependencies; Agreement; Anti agreement; Anti locality; Bantu; Base generation; Case; Dislocation; Kinande; Left edge; Locality; Resumption; Resumptive pronoun; Subject; Wh agreement

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249067969     PISSN: 0167806X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-006-9014-5     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anagnostopoulou, E., van Riemsdijk, H., & Zwarts, F. (1997). Materials on left dislocation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Anderson, S. (1993). Wackernagel's revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language, 69, 68-98.
3. Aoun, J. (1981). The formal nature of anaphoric relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
4. Aoun, J. (1985). A grammar of anaphora. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Aoun, J., & Benmamoun, A. (1998). Minimality, reconstruction, and PF-movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 569-597.
6. Authier, J.-M. (1988). Null object constructions in Kinande. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 19-37.
7. Baker, M. (1985). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 373-415.
8. Baker, M. (1996). The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Baker, M. (2003). Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality. In A. Garnie, H. Harley, & M. A. Willie (Eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar (pp. 107-132). Linguistics Today 62, John Benjamins.
10. Bhatt, R. (2002). Verb second. Class handout, available from http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/~bhatt/lin3811/13.pdf.
11. Boeckx, C. (2001). Mechanisms of chain formation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
12. Boeckx, C. (2003). Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Chomsky, N. (1995). Categories and Transformations. In The minimalist program (pp. 219-394). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
15. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagareka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Chung, S. (1982). Unbounded dependencies in Chamorro grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 39-77.
17. Chung, S. (1998). The design of agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Clements, Q. (1984). Binding domains in Kikuyu. Studies in the. Linguistic Sciences, 14, 37-56.
19. Collins, C. (1997). Local economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Den Dikken, M. (2006). Relators and linkers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Den Dikken, M., & Naess, A. (1993). Case dependencies: The case of predicate inversion. The Linguistic Review, 10, 303-336.
22. Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Dukes, M. (1992). On the status of Chamorro Wi-agreement. In J. Mead (Ed.), Proceedings of the WCCFL 11 (pp. 177-190) Stanford: CSLI.
24. Emonds, J. P. (1970). Root and structure-preserving transformations, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
25. Georgopoulos, C. (1985). Variables in Palauan syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 3, 59-94.
26. Georgopoulos, C. (1991). Syntactic variables: Resumptive pronouns and A-binding in Palauan. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
27. Grohmann, K. (2000). Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.
28. Grohmann, K. (2003). Prolific, domains. On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Grohmann, K. (2005). The road to PF. Handout from talk given at the 17th international symposium on theoretical and applied linguistics. Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.
30. Haft, I. (1990). Anaphoric, pronominal, and referential INFL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 347-374.
31. Hornstein, N. (1995). Logical form: From GB to minimalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Hornstein, N. (2001). Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford: Blackwell.
33. latridou, S. (1990). Clitics and Island effects, ms., MIT
34. Jelinek, E. (1984). Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 39-76.
35. Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Kayne, R. (2005). Pronouns and their antecedents. In Movement and silence, chapter 6. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Li, Y.-H. A. (1992). Dou: syntax or LF? Conference talk at the 4th North American conference on Chinese linguistics (NACCL), Michigan University, Ann Arbor.
38. Maranz, A. (1993). Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of bantu grammar I (pp. 113-150). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
39. McCloskey, J. (2002). Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In S. D. Epstein & T. D. Seely,(Eds), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program (pp. 184-226). Oxford: Blackwell.
40. McGinnis, M. (1998). Locality in A-movement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
41. Miyagawa, S. (2005). On the EPP. In M. McGinnis & N. Richards (Eds.), Perspectives on phases (pp. 201-235). MIT Working papers in Linguistics 49, Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT
42. Ouhalla, I (1993). Subject-extraction, negation and the anti-Agreement effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 11, 477-518.
43. Phillips, C. (1996). Disagreement between adults and children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego. (Published 1998 in A. Mendikoetxea & M. Uribe-Etxebarria (Eds.,) Theoretical issues on the morphology-syntax interface (pp. 173-212). San Sebastian: ASJU.
44. Progovac, L. (1993). Non-augmented NPs in Kinande as negative polarity items. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar 1 (pp. 257-270). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
45. Richards, N. (1997). What moves where when in which language? Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
46. Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar; A handbook of generative, syntax (pp. 281-337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
47. Rizzi, L. (2002). Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond; The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3 (pp. 223-252). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Schneider-Zioga, P. (1988). Specifier/head agreement in Kinande. Handout from the. Second Niger-Congo syntax and semantics workshop. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
49. Schneider-Zioga, P. (1994). The syntax of clitic doubling in modern Greek. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, USC.
50. Schneider-Zioga, P. (1995). Specifier/head agreement in Kinande. Cahiers Linguistiques d'Ottawa, 23, 67-93.
51. Schneider-Zioga, P. (1998). A predication analysis of clitic pronouns in Greek. In P. Tamanji, & K. Kusumoto (Eds.), Proceedings of N ELS 28 (pp. 183-196). Amherst: GLSA.
52. Schneider-Zioga, P. (1999). A successive cyclic account of anti-agreement effects in Kinande. Handout from the Annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, CA.
53. Schneider-Zioga, P. (2000). Anti-agreement and the fine structure of the left edge. In R. Ai et al. (Eds.), Working papers in linguistics 6 (pp. 94-114). Irvine: Department of Linguistics, University of California
54. Schneider-Zioga, P. (2002). The case of anti-agreement. In A. Rackowski & N. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of AFLA 8: The eighth meeting of the Austronesian formal linguistics association (pp. 325-339). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 44. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
55. Tuller, L. (1985). Tense features and operators in Hausa. In Rapport de Recherches du Groupe de Linguistique Africaniste, (pp. 493-516). année 1985-1986, Montréal: Department of Linguistics, University of Quebec at Montreal
56. Van Riemsdijk, H., & Zwarts, (1997). Left dislocation in Dutch and status of copying rules. In E. Anagnostopoulou, F. et al. (Eds.), Materials on left dislocation, (pp. 13-29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
57. Vikner, S. (1995). Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Wackernagel, J. (1892). Ueber ein Gesetz der Indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische. Forschung, 1, 333-446.
59. Zwart, C. J.-W. (2005). Verb second as a function of merge. In M. den Dikken & C. Tortora (Eds.), The function of function words and functional categories, (pp. 11-40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
60. Zubizarreta, M. L. (1999). The cl(itic) projection in questions. In Universidad AutOnoma de Barcelona. The Catalan working papers (pp. 253-277).
61. Zubizarreta, M. L. (2001). The constraint on preverbal subjects in romance interrogatives: A minimality effect. In A. Hulke & J-Y. Pollock (Eds.), On romance inversion (pp. 183-204). Oxford: Oxford University Press.