Current evidence on intermittent catheterization: Sterile single-use catheters or clean reused catheters and the incidence of UTI

Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 289-296

  Getliffe, Kathryn ^a   Fader, Mandy ^a   Allen, Colleen ^b   Pinar, Kim ^b   Moore, Katherine N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFECTION CONTROL; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECYCLING; STANDARD; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; COATED MATERIALS, BIOCOMPATIBLE; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT CONTAMINATION; EQUIPMENT REUSE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INFECTION CONTROL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN; URINARY CATHETERIZATION; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;

EID: 34249059975     PISSN: 10715754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.WON.0000270824.37436.f6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Wyndaele JJ. Complications of intermittent catheterization: their prevention and treatment. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:536-541.
2. Campbell JB, Moore KN, Voaklander DC, Mix LW. Complications associated with clean intermittent catheterization in children with spina bifida. J Urol. 2004;171(6 Pt 1):2420-2422.
3. Cottenden A, Bliss D, Fader M, et al. Management with continence products. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, eds. Incontinence: 3rd International Consultation on Incontinence. Vol 1. 3rd ed. Plymbridge, UK: Health Publications Ltd.; 2005:149-253.
4. Vaidyanathan S, Soni BM, Dundas S, Krishnan KR. Urethral cytology in spinal cord injury patients performing intermittent catheterisation. Paraplegia. 1994;32:493-500.
5. Fader M, Moore KN, Cottenden AM, Pettersson L, Brooks R, Malone-Lee J. Coated catheters for intermittent catheterization: Smooth or sticky? Br J Urol Int. 2001;88:373-377.
6. Hedlund H, Hjelmas KJonsson O, Klarskov P, Talja M. Hydrophilic versus non-coated catheters for intermittent catheterization. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001;35(1):49-53.
7. De Ridder DJMK, Everaert K, Garcia Fernandez L, et al. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic-coated catheters (Speedicath) reduces the risk of clinical urinary tract infection in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomised parallel comparative trial. Euro Urol. 2005;48:991-995.
8. Moore KN, Burt J, Voaklander DC. Intermittent catheterisation in the rehabilitation setting: a comparison of clean and sterile technique. Clin Rehab. 2006;20:461-468.
9. Moore KN, Keim M, Sinclair O, Cadrain G. Bacteriuria in intermittent catheterization users: the effect of sterile versus clean reused catheters. Rehab Nurs. 1993;18:306-309.
10. Schlager TA, Clark M, Anderson S. Effect of a single-use sterile catheter for each void on the frequency of bacteriuria in children with neurogenic bladder on intermittent catheterization for bladder emptying. Pediatrics. 2001;108(4):E71.
11. Duffy LM, Cleary J, Ahern S, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization: safe, cost-effective bladder management for male residents of VA nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1995;43:865-870.
12. King RB, Carlson CE, Mervine J, Wu Y, Yarkony GM. Clean and sterile intermittent catheterization methods in hospitalized patients with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1992;73:798-802.
13. Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G, Virgili G, Dolci S, Porena M. Intermittent catheterization with a prelubricated catheter in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective randomized crossover study. J Urol. 2001;166(1):130-133.
14. Day RA, Moore KM, Albers MK. A pilot study comparing two methods of intermittent catheterization: limitations and challenges. Urolog Nurs. 2003;23:143-147.
15. Quigley PA, Riggln OZ. A comparison of open and closed catheterization techniques in rehabilitation patients. Rehab Nurs. 1993;18(1):26-29, 33.
16. Pachler J, Frimodt-Moller C. A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization. Br J Urol Int. 1999;83:767-769.
17. Sutherland RS, Kogan BA, Baskin LS, Mevorach RA. Clean intermittent catheterization in boys using the LoFric catheter. J Urol. 1996;156:2041-2043.
18. Vapnek JM, Maynard FM, Kim J. A prospective randomized trial of the LoFric hydrophilic coated catheter versus conventional plastic catheter for clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol. 2003;169:994-998.
19. Prieto-Fingerhut T, Banovac K, Lynne CM. A study comparing sterile and nonsterile urethral catheterization in patients with spinal cord injury. Rehab Nurs. 1997;22:299-302.