A comparison of EQ-5D index scores derived from the US and UK population-based scoring functions

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 321-326

  Nan Luo, ^a   Johnson, Jeffrey A ^b   Shaw, James W ^c   Coons, Stephen Joel ^d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost utility analysis; EQ 5D; Health state preferences; Health state values; Valuation

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEPRESSION; EQ 5D; HEALTH STATUS; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PAIN; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CARE; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34249044525     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07300603     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996 ; 37: 53 - 72.
2. Rabin R., de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 ; 33: 337 - 43.
3. Gold MR, Patrick DL, Torrance DG, et al. Identifying and valuing outcomes. In: Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press ; 1996. p 82 - 134.
4. Drummond MF, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 2 nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press ; 1997.
5. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997 ; 35: 1095 - 1108.
6. Dolan P., Gudex C., Kind P., Williams A. The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ. 1996 ; 5: 141 - 54.
7. Busschbach J., Weijnen T., Nieuwenhuizen M., et al. A comparison of EQ-5D time trade-off values obtained in Germany, the United Kingdom, and Spain. In: Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F, eds. The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic ; 2003. p 143 - 65.
8. Tsuchiya A., Ikeda S., Ikegami N., et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002 ; 11: 341 - 53.
9. Lamer LM, McDonnell J., Stalmeier Pfm, Krabbe Pfm, Busschbach J. A Dutch value set for the EQ-5D: first results. In: Prevolnik Rupel V, ed. 20th Plenary Meeting of the EuroQol Group: Discussion Paper. Bled, Slovenia, 11-14 September 2003. Discussion Paper. Republic of Slovenia: Ministry of Health; 2003. p 87-99.
10. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005 ; 43: 203 - 20.
11. Badia X., Roset M., Herdman M., Kind P. A comparison of United Kingdom and Spanish general population time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states. Med Decis Making. 2001 ; 21: 7 - 16.
12. Tsuchiya A., Ikeda S., Ikegami N., et al. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002 ; 11: 341 - 53.
13. Johnson JA, Luo N., Shaw JW, Kind P., Coons SJ Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the US and UK different? Med Care. 2005 ; 43: 221 - 8.
14. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP Application of multi-attribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res. 1982 ; 30: 1043 - 69.
15. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley ; 2000.
16. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2 nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 1988.