Correcting home-range models for observation bias

Journal of Wildlife Management

Volumn 71, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 996-1001

  Horne, Jon S ^a   Garton, Edward O ^a   Sager Fradkin, Kimberly A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Biotelemetry; Bivariate normal; Global Positioning System; Home range; Kernel; Maximum likelihood; Nonresponse; Observation bias; Telemetry

Indexed keywords

BIOTELEMETRY; DEER; ECOSYSTEM MODELING; ESTIMATION METHOD; GPS; HOME RANGE;

CERVIDAE; ODOCOILEUS; ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS;

EID: 34249031418     PISSN: 0022541X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/2005-678     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson-Sprecher, R. 1994. Robust estimates of wildlife location using telemetry data. Biometrics 50:406-416.
2. Beyer, D. E., Jr., and J. B. Haufler. 1994. Diurnal versus 24-hour sampling of habitat use. Journal of Wildlife Management 58:178-180.
3. Calhoun, J. B., and J. U. Casby. 1958. Calculation of home range and density of small mammals. U.S. Public Health Service Public Health Monograph 55, Washington, D.C., USA.
4. Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling techniques. Third edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, USA.
5. Cochran, W. G. 1983. Historical perspective. Pages 11-25 in W. G. Madow, I. Olkin, and D. B. Rubin, editors. Incomplete data in sample surveys. Volume 2: theory and bibliographies. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
6. Conner, M., B. Plowman, B. D. Leopold, and C. Lovell. 1999. Influence of time-in-residence on home range and habitat use of bobcats. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:261-269.
7. D'Eon, R. G. 2003. Effects of stationary GPS fix-rate bias on habitatselection analyses. Journal of Wildlife Management 67:858-863.
8. D'Eon, R. G., R. Serrouya, G. Smith, and C. O. Kochanny. 2002. GPS radiotelemetry error and bias in mountainous terrain, Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:430-439.
9. Don, B. A. C., and K. Rennolls. 1983. A home range model incorporating biological attraction points. Journal of Animal Ecology 52:69-81.
10. Dussault, C., R. Courtois, J. P. Ouellet, and J. Huot. 1999. Evaluation of GPS telemetry collar performance for habitat studies in the boreal forest. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:965-972.
11. Frair, J. L., S. E. Nielsen, E. H. Merrill, S. R. Lele, M. S. Boyce, R. H. M. Munro, G. B. Stenhouse, and H. L. Beyer. 2004. Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:201-212,
12. Garton, E. O., M. J. Wisdom, F. A. Leban, and B. K. Johnson. 2001. Experimental design for radiotelemetry studies. Pages 15-42 in J. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluff, editors. Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
13. Home, J. S., and E. O. Garton, 2006a. Selecting the best home range model: an information theoretic approach, Ecology 87:1146-1152,
14. Home, J. S., and E. O. Garton. 2006b. Likelihood cross-validation versus least squares-cross-validation for choosing the smoothing parameter in kernel home-range analysis. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:641-648.
15. Jennrich, R. I., and F. B. Turner. 1969. Measurements of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22:227-237.
16. Johnson, B. K., A. A. Ager, S. L. Findholt, M. J. Wisdom, D. B. Marx, J. W. Kern, and L. D. Bryant. 1998. Mitigating spatial differences in observation rate of automated telemetry systems. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:958-967.
17. Jones, M. C. 1991. Kernel density estimation for length biased data. Biometrika 78:511-519.
18. Kernohan, B. J., R. A. Gitzen, and J. J. Millspaugh. 2001. Analysis of animal space use and movements. Pages 125-166 in J. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluff, editors. Radio tracking and animal populations, Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
19. Lawless, J. F., J. D. Kalbfleisch, and C. J. Wild. 1999. Semiparametric methods for response-selective and missing data problems in regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 61:413-438.
20. Little, R. J. A. 1986. Survey nonresponse adjustments for estimates of means. International Statistical Review 54:139-157.
21. Lohr, S. L. 1999. Sampling: design and analysis. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, California, USA.
22. Marzluff, J. M., J. J. Millspaugh, P. Hurvitz, and M. S. Handcock. 2004. Relating resources to a probabilistic measure of space use: forest fragments and Steller's jays. Ecology 85:1411-1427.
23. Minta, S. C. 1992. Tests of spatial and temporal interaction among animals. Ecological Applications 2:178-188.
24. Moen, R., J. Pastor, Y. Cohen, and C. C. Schwartz. 1996. Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance. Journal of Wildlife Management 60:659-668.
25. Norbury, G. L., D. C. Norbury, and R. P. Heyward. 1998. Behavioral responses of two predator species to sudden declines in primary prey. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:45-58.
26. Obbard, M. E., B. A. Pond, and A. Perera. 1998. Preliminary evaluation of GPS collars for analysis of habitat use and activity patterns of black bears. Ursus 10:209-217.
27. Otis, D. L., and G. C. White. 1999. Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:1039-1044.
28. Rodgers, A. R. 2001. Recent telemetry technology. Pages 79-121 in J. J. Millspaugh and J. M. Marzluff, editors. Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
29. Samuel, M. D., and M. R. Fuller. 1994. Wildlife radiotelemetry. Pages 370-418 in T. A. Bookhout, editor. Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats. Fifth edition. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
30. Samuel, M. D., and K. P. Kenow. 1992. Evaluating habitat selection with radio-telemetry triangulation error. Journal of Wildlife Management 56:725-734.
31. West, D. H. D. 1979. Updating mean and variance estimates: an improved method. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 22:532-535.
32. White, G. C., and R. A. Garrott. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
33. Worton, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164-168.