Field dependency and the sense of object-presence in haptic virtual environments

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 243-251

  Hecht, David ^a,b   Reiner, Miriam ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CREATIVITY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGINATION; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CREATIVENESS; CUES; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; KINESTHESIS; MALE; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PROPRIOCEPTION; REALITY TESTING; SOFTWARE; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 34249019809     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9962     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Slater, M., & Usoh, M. (1993). Representation systems, perceptual position and presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2:221-233.
2. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Steed, A. (1994). Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 3:130-144.
3. Slater, M., Usoh, M., & Chrysanthou, Y. (1995). The influence of shadows on presence in immersive virtual environments. In: Goebel, M. (ed.), Virtual environments '95. New York: Springer Computer Science, pp. 8-21.
4. Witmer, B.G., & Singer, M.J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7:225-240.
5. Baños, R.M., Botella, C., Garcia-Palacios, A., et al. (1999). Psychological variables and reality judgment in virtual environments: the roles of absorption and dissociation. CyberPsychology & Behavior 2:143-148.
6. Sas, C., & O'Hare, G.M.P. (2003). Presence equation: an investigation into cognitive factors underlying presence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 12:523-527.
7. Sas, C., O'Hare, G.M.P., & Reilly, R. (2004). Presence and task performance: an approach in the light of cognitive style. Cognition, Technology & Work 6:53-56.
8. Sas, C. (2004). Individual differences in virtual environments. Notes in Computer Science Lecture 3038:1017-1024.
9. th International Workshop on Presence London, UK: University College, pp. 143-151.
10. th International Workshop on Presence. London, UK: University College, pp. 133-142.
11. Witkin, H.A. Dyk, R.B., Faterson, H.F., et al. (1962). Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.
12. Witkin, H.A., & Goodenough, D.R. (1981). Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependece and independence. New York: International Universities Press.
13. Reger, G.M., McGee, J.S., van der Zaag, C., et al. (2003). A 3D virtual environment rod and frame test: the reliability and validity of four traditional scoring methods for older adults. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 25:1169-1177.
14. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskyn, E., et al. (1971). A manual for the embedded figures tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
15. Bell, E.G. (1955). Inner-directed and Other-directed attitudes. [Doctoral dissertation]. Yale University.
16. Gudjonsson, G.H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. Chichester: Wiley, UK.
17. Blagrove, M., Cole-Morgan, D., & Lambe, H. (1994). Interrogative suggestibility: the effects of sleep deprivation and relationship with field-dependence. Applied Cognitive Psychology 8:169-179.
18. Manning, L. (1991). Objective and Subjective Factors in Field Dependence-Independence. In: Wapner, S., & Demick, J. (eds.), Field dependence-independence: cognitive style across the life span. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates, pp. 85-103.
19. Goldenberg, N., & Wachtel, P. (1973). Hypnotizability and cognitive controls. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis 21:298-304.
20. Gates, D.W. (1971). Verbal conditioning, transfer and operant level "speech style" as functions of cognitive style. [Doctoral dissertation]. City University of New York.
21. Melancon, J.G., & Thompson, B. (1989). Measurement characteristics of the finding embedded figures test. Psychology in the Schools 26:69-78.
22. Elliot, R. (1961). Interrelationships among measures of field independence, ability and personality traits. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 63:27-38.
23. Hergovich, A. (2003). Field dependence, suggestibility and belief in paranormal phenomena. Personality and Individual Differences 34:195-209.
24. Nisbett, R.E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 100:11163-11170.
25. Ji, L., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R.E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 78:943-955.
26. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., et al. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: a cultural look at new look. Psychological Science 14:201-206.
27. Nisbett, R.E., & Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 9:467-473.
28. Heine, S., Lehman, D., Markus, H., et al. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review 106:766-794.
29. Triandis, H. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
30. Korchin, S.J. (1986). Field Dependence, Personality Theory and Clinical Research. In Bertini, M., Pizzamiglio, L. & Wapner, S. (eds.), Field dependence in psychological theory, research and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates, pp. 45-56.
31. Oltman, P.K. (1986). Psychological differentiation theory in social and cross-cultural psychology. In: Bertini, M., Pizzamiglio, L. & Wapner, S. (eds.), Field dependence in psychological theory, research and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates, pp. 85-91.
32. Reiner, M. (2004). The role of haptics in immersive telecommunication environments. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14:392-401.
33. Stevens, B., & Jerrams-Smith, J. (2001). The sense of object-presence with projection-augmented models. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2058:73-75.
34. Stevens, B., Jerrams-Smith, J., Heathcote, D., et al. (2002). Putting the virtual into reality: assessing object-presence with projection-augmented models. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 11:79-92.
35. Demick, J. (1991). Organismic factors in field dependence-independence: gender, personality, psychopathology. In: Wapner, S., & Demick, J. (eds.), Field dependence-independence: cognitive style across the life span. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates. pp. 209-243.
36. th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), San Antonio, TX.
37. Biocca, F., Kim, J., & Choi, Y. (2001). Visual touch in virtual environments: an exploratory study of presence, multimodal interfaces, and cross-modal sensory illusions. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10:247-266.
38. Jansson, G. (2001). The potential importance of perceptual filling-in for haptic perception of virtual object form. In: Baber, C., Faint, M., Wall, S., et al. (eds.), Conference Proceedings of Eurohaptics 2001 (Educational Technology Research Papers), Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham, pp. 72-75.
39. Singer, J. (2000). Imagination. In: Kazdin, A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 227-230.
40. Rastogi, M. (1987). A study of cognitive style in relation to intelligence and creativity. Journal of Personality & Clinical Studies 3:161-164.
41. Noppe, L.D. (1985). The relationship of formal thought and cognitive styles to creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior 19:88-96.
42. Ogle, T. (2002). The effects of virtual environments on recall in participants of differing levels of field dependence. [Doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
43. Dinh, H.G., Walker, N., Hodges, L.F., et al. (1999). Evaluating the importance of multi-sensory input on memory and the sense of presence in virtual environments. In: Rosenblum, L. Astheimer, P., & Teichmann, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality '99 Conference. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 222-228.
44. Alexander, R.A., & Barrett, G.V. (1975). Relationship between perceptual style and responses to visual motion under active and passive viewing conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology 60:507-512.
45. Bronstein, A.M. (2002). Under-rated neuro-otological symptoms: Hoffman and Brookler 1978 revisited. British Medical Bulletin 63:213-221.
46. Guerraz, M., Yardley, L., Bertholon, P., et al. (2001). Visual vertigo: symptom assessment, spatial orientation and postural control. Brain 124:1646-1656.
47. Barrett, G.V., Thornton, C.L., & Cabe, P.A. (1970). Cue conflict related to perceptual style. Journal of Applied Psychology 54:258-264.
48. th annual human factors and ergonomics society meeting. Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN, pp. 1906-1910.
49. Sadowski, W., & Stanney, K.M. (2002). Presence in virtual environments. In: K.M. Stanney (ed.), Handbook of virtual environments: design, implementation, and applications Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 791-806.
50. Draper, M.H., Viire, E.S., Furness, T.A., et al. (2001). Effects of image scale and system time delay on simulator sickness within head-coupled virtual environments. Human Factors 43:129-146.
51. Duh, H.B.L., Parker, D.E., Philips, J.O., et al. (2004). "Conflicting" motion cues to the visual and vestibular self-motion systems around 0.06 Hz evoke simulator sickness. Human Factors 46:142-153.
52. Slater, M. (2004). How colorful was your day? Why questionnaires cannot assess presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13:484-493.
53. Sanchez-Vives, M.V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 6:332-339.