A BENEFIT/COST ANALYSIS OF THE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS (CVISN) PROGRAM

Research in Transportation Economics

Volumn 8, Issue , 2004, Pages 379-401

  Brand, Daniel ^a   Parody, Thomas E ^a   Orban, John E ^a   Brown, Vincent J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249016822     PISSN: 07398859     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0739-8859(04)08016-3     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. American Trucking Associations (1995). 1994 Motor carrier annual report: Financial and operating statistics . Alexandria, VA.
2. Battelle (2002, March). Evaluation of the commercial vehicle information systems and networks (cvisn) model deployment initiative . Prepared for the ITS Joint Program Office, Final Report.
3. Brand, D. (1994). Criteria and methods for evaluating intelligent transportation system plans and operational tests. Transportation Research Record No. 1453 .
4. Brand, D. (1996, June 1). The values of time savings for intercity air and auto travelers for trips under 500 miles in the U.S. Prepared for U.S. DOT, Office of the Secretary, Panel on the Value of Time for Use in Transportation Investment Valuation.
5. Brand, D. et al. (2001). Application of benefit-cost analysis to the proposed California high speed rail system. Transportation Research Record , 1742.
6. Electronic diesels and other ways to improve fuel economy. Commercial Carrier Journal , April 1993, as cited in Office of Technology Assessment , Saving Energy in U.S. Transportation, OTA-ETI-589, July 1994.
7. Federal Highway Administration (1998, May). U.S. freight: Economy in motion. FHWA-PL-98-034.
8. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (2000, January). Large Truck Crash Profile: The 1998 National Picture.
9. Forkenbrock, D. (1999, September/November). External costs of intercity truck freight transportation. Transportation Research A , 33 (7/8).
10. Iowa State University, Center for Transportation Research and Education (1998). Advantage I-75 mainline automated clearance system: Final evaluation report. August, 3–26. With calculations by Charles River Associates.
11. Miller, T. et al. (The Urban Institute) (1991, October). The costs of highway crashes, Report No. FHWA-RD-91-055.
12. Miller, T. R., Spicer, R. S., Lestina, D. C., & Levy, D. T. (1999). Is it safest to travel by bicycle, car, or big truck? Journal of Prevention and Injury Control , 1 (1).
13. Office of Management and Budget (1992, October 29). Guidelines and discount rates for benefit-cost analysis of federal programs. Circular No. A-94 (Revised).
14. Richeson, K. (2000, February). The Johns Hopkins University, Applied Physics Laboratory. Introductory Guide to CVISN , POR-99-7186.
15. Transportation Research Board (1996). Paying our way: Estimating marginal social costs of freight transportation. Special Report 246.
16. Tyworth, J., & Zeng, A. (1998, February). Estimating the effects of carrier transit-time performance on logistics cost and service. Transportation Research A , 32 (2).
17. U.S. Department of Commerce (1997). Motor freight transportation and warehousing survey: 1995, issued February.
18. U.S. Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Commerce (1999, December). 1997 commodity flow survey.
19. U.S. EPA (1998, April). Emission facts: Idling vehicle emissions, report no. EPA-F-98-014, http://www.epa.gov/oms/consumer/f98014.htm .
20. U.S. EPA (1999). Guidelines for preparing economic analyses, June 11, Chapter 6: Recommends a real rate of 2 to 3 percent for some public projects.
21. Zaloshnja, E., Miller, T., & Spicer, R. (2000, November 30). Pacific institute for research and evaluation. Costs of Large Truck- and Bus-Involved Crashes. Prepared for the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.