Histologic and duplex comparison of the perclose and angio-seal percutaneous closure devices

Vascular

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 24-29

  Gargiulo III, Nicholas J ^a,b,c   Veith, Frank J ^a   Ohki, Takao ^a   Scher, Lawrence A ^a   Berdejo, George L ^a   Lipsitz, Evan C ^a   Menegus, Mark ^a   Greenberg, Mark ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Angio Seal; Closure devices; Perclose

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTERIOGRAPHY; ARTERY DISEASE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DOG; ECHOGRAPHY; FLOW RATE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CICATRIX; DOGS; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; HYPERPLASIA; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 34249016676     PISSN: 17085381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/6670.2007.00004     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Fram DB, Giri S, Jamil G, et al. Suture closure of the femoral arteriotomy following invasive cardiac procedures: a detailed analysis of efficacy, complications, and the impact of early ambulation in 1,200 consecutive, unselected cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:163-73.
2. Eggebrecht H, Haude M, von Birgelen C, et al. Early clinical experience with the 6 French angio-seal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:437-42.
3. Balzer JO, Scheinert D, Diebold T, et al. Postinterventional transcutaneous suture of femoral artery access sites in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: a study of 930 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:174-81.
4. Rinder MR, Tamirisa PK, Taniuchi M, et al. Safety and efficacy of suture-mediated closure after percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;54:146-51.
5. Kahn Z, Kumar M, Hollander G, et al. Safety and efficacy of the perclose suture-mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002;55:8-13.
6. Gerckens U, Cattelaens N, Lampe EG, et al. Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1658-63.
7. Cherr GS, Travis JA, Ligush J, et al. Infection is an unusual but serious complication of a femoral atery catheterization site closure device. Ann Vasc Surg 2001;15:567-70.
8. Eidt JF, Habibipour S, Saucedo JF, et al. Surgical complications from hemostatic puncture closure devices. Am J Surg 1999;178:511-5.
9. Goyen M, Manz S, Kroger K, et al. Interventional therapy of vascular complications caused by the hemostatic puncture closure device angioseal. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:142-7.
10. Gonze MD, Sternbergh C, Salartash K, et al. Complications associated with percutaneous closure devices. Am J Surg 1999;178:209-11.
11. Steinkamp HJ, Werk M, Beck A, et al. Excimer laser-assisted recanalisation of femoral arterial stenosis or occlusion caused by the use of Angio-Seal. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1364-70.
12. Cura FA, Kapadia SR, L'Allier PL, et al. Safety of femoral closure devices after percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa platelet blockade. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:780-2.
13. Chamberlin J, Lardi A, McKeever L, et al. Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femstop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring abciximab (ReoPro). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;47:143-7.
14. Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;291:350-7.