Analyzing language, interaction and outcomes in an inquiry-oriented classroom

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 165-170

  Oliveira, Alandeom ^a   Sadler, Troy ^b   Suslak, Daniel ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249013093     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-007-9051-3     Document Type: Note

References (17)

1. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137.
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (Y. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33.
4. Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1439-1465.
5. Davidson, D. (1980). Agency. In D. Davidson (Ed.) Essays on actions and events (pp. 43-61). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Karp, I. (1986). Agency and social theory: A review of Anthony Giddens. American Ethnologist, 13(1), 131-137.
7. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Mishler, E. G. (1991). Representing discourse: The rhetoric of transcription. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(4), 255-280.
9. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Roth, W.-M., & Middleton, D. (2006). Knowing what you tell, telling what you know: uncertainty and asymmetries of meaning in interpreting graphical data. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 11-81.
12. Shoaps, R. (1999). The many voices of Rush Limbaugh: The use of transposition in constructing a rhetoric of common sense. Text, 19(3), 399-437.
13. Slembrouck, S. (1992). The parliamentary Hansard 'verbatim' report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature, 1(2), 101-119.
14. Schwab, J. J. (1966). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Tannen, D. (1985). Relative focus on involvement in oral and written discourse. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.) Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 124-147). Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
16. Wald, B. (1995). The problem of scholarly predisposition. Language in Society, 24(2), 245-257.
17. Wertsch, J. V., Tulviste, P. & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A social cultural approach to agency. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.) Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 336-356). New York: Oxford University Press.