Modeling test responses by multivariable polynomials of higher degrees

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 832-867

  Lin, Jiguan G ^a  

^a Linsys   (United States)

Author keywords

Higher order response modeling; Least squares; Number of terms; Polynomial approximation; Rank deficiency; Regression; Response surface; Singular value decomposition; Subset selection

Indexed keywords

DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PROBLEM SOLVING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

HIGHER-ORDER RESPONSE MODELING; NUMBER OF TERMS; RANK DEFICIENCY; RESPONSE SURFACE; SUBSET SELECTION;

POLYNOMIAL APPROXIMATION;

EID: 34248996547     PISSN: 10648275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/040603954     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. [BatesGW03] R. A. BATES, B. GIGLIO, AND H. P. WYNN, A global selection procedure for polynomial interpolators, Technometrics, 45 (2003), pp. 246-255.
2. [BoxD71] M. J. BOX AND N. R. DRAPER, Factorial designs, the |X'X| criterion, and some related matters, Technometrics, 13 (1971), pp. 731-742.
3. [Chan82] T. F. CHAN, An improved algorithm for computing the singular value decomposition, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 8 (1982), pp. 72-83.
4. [ChenAT96] W. CHEN, J. K. ALLEN, K.-L. TSUI, AND F. MISTREE, A procedure for robust design, ASME J. Mech. Design, 118 (1996), pp. 478-485.
5. [ChenGM01] W. CHEN, R. GARIMELLA, AND N. MICHELENA, Robust design for improved vehicle handling under a range of maneuver conditions, Engineering Optimization, 33 (2001), pp. 303-326.
6. [GiuntBH97] A. A. GIUNTA, V. BALABANOV, D. HAIM, B. GROSSMAN, W. H. MASON, L. T. WATSON, AND R. T. HAFTKA, Multidisciplinary optimisation of a supersonic transport using design of experiments theory and response surface modelling, Aeronautical J., 101 (1997), pp. 347-356.
7. [Golub69] G. H. GOLUB, Matrix decompositions and statistical calculations, in Statistical Computation, R. C. Milton and J. A. Neider, eds., Academic Press, New York, 1969, pp. 365-397.
8. [GolubK69] G. GOLUB AND W. KAHAN, Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2 (1965), pp. 205-224.
9. [GolubR70] G. H. GOLUB AND C. REINSCH, Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions, Numer. Math., 14 (1970), pp. 403-420. Also in Handbook for Automatic Computation, Vol. 2, Linear Algebra, J. H. Wilkinson and C. Reinsch, eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
10. [GolubV83] G. H. GOLUB AND C. F. VAN LOAN, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1983.
11. [Grevi59] T. N. E. GREVILLE, The pseudoinverse of a rectangular or singular matrix and its application to the solution of systems of linear equations, SIAM Rev., 1 (1959), pp. 38-43.
12. [HinkeK94] K. HINKELMAN AND O. KEMPTHORNE, Design and Analysis of Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.
13. [KamhaKT03] H. KAMHAWI, T. M. KRIVANEK, S. R. THOMAS, AND J. F. WALKER, Direct-Connect Ejector Ramjet Combustor Experiment, AIAA Paper 2003-0016, 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2003.
14. [KlemaL80] V. C. KLEMA AND A. J. LAUB, The singular value decomposition: Its computation and some applications, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 25 (1980), pp. 164-176.
15. [KornK68] G. A. KORN AND T. M. KORN, Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.
16. [KhuriC96] A. I. KHURIC AND J. A. CORNELL, Response Surfaces: Designs and Analysis, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996.
17. [LawsoH74] C. L. LAWSON AND R. J. HANSON, Solving Least Squares Problems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974.
18. [Mitch74] T. J. MITCHELL, An algorithm for the construction of D-optimal experimental designs, Technometrics, 16 (1974), pp. 203-210.
19. [Myers71] R. H. MYERS, Response Surface Methodology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 1971.
20. [MyersM95] R. H. MYERS AND D. C. MONTGOMERY, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley, New York, 1995.
21. [Renka88] R. J. RENKA, Multivariate interpolation of large sets of scattered data, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 14 (1988), pp. 139-148.
22. [Renka99] R. J. RENKA, Algorithm 790: CSHEP2D: Cubic Shepard method for bivariate interpolation of scattered data, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 25 (1999), pp. 70-73.
23. [Rohde66] C. A. ROHDE, Some results on generalized inverses, SIAM Rev., 8 (1966), pp. 201-205.
24. [Sear171] S. R. SEARLE, Linear Models, John Wiley, New York, 1971.
25. [SteffSY00] C. J. STEFFEN, JR., T. D. SMITH, S. YUNGSTER, AND D. J. KELLER, Computational analysis for rocket-based combined-cycle systems during all-rocket mode, AIAA J. Propulsion & Power, 16 (2000), pp. 1030-1039.
26. [Stewa73] G. W. STEWART, Introduction to Matrix Computations, Academic Press, New York, 1973.
27. [Trefh99] C. TREFNY, An Air-Breathing Launch Vehicle Concept for Single-Stage-to-Orbit, AIAA Paper 99-2730, 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 1999.
28. [Wilki68] J. H. WILKINSON, A priori error analysis of algebraic processes, Proc. Intl. Cong. Math., Mir, Moscow, 1968, pp. 629-639.