The values of variables in dynamic semantics

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 211-257

  Dekker, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248790282     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: 15730549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00628200     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, 'Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language', Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159-220.
2. Bäuerle, Rainer & U. Egli: 1985, Anapher, Nominalphrase und Eselsätze, Sonderforschungsbericht, Universität Konstanz, Konstanz.
3. Beaver, D.: 1995, Presuppositon and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics, Ph.D. thesis, CCS, Edinburgh.
4. Chierchia, G.: 1992, 'Anaphora and Dynamic Binding', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 111-83.
5. Dekker, P.: 1993a, 'Existential Disclosure', Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 561-88.
6. Dekker, P.: 1993b, Transsentential Meditations. Ups and Downs in Dynamic Semantics, Ph.D. thesis, ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
7. Dekker, P.: 1994, 'Predicate Logic with Anaphora (Seven Inch Version)', in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV, Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Cornell University, pp. 79-95.
8. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1991, 'Dynamic Predicate Logic', Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 39-100.
9. Groenendijk, J., M. Stokhof, and F. Veltman: 1994, 'Update Semantic for Modal Predicate Logic', in R. H. Cooper and J. A. Groenendijk (eds.), Integrating Semantic Theories II, ILLC, Amsterdam, Dyana-2 report R2.1.B, pp. 135-226.
10. Heim, I: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Published in 1989 by Garland, New York.
11. Heim, I.: 1983, 'File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Definiteness', in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 164-89.
12. Heim, I.: 1990, 'E-Type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137-78.
13. Kadmon, N.: 1987, On Unique and Non-Unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
14. Kadmon, N.: 1990, 'Uniqueness', Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 273-324.
15. Kamp, H.: 1981, 'A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation', in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre, Amsterdam, pp. 227-322.
16. Reprinted in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, 1984, pp. 2-41.
17. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
18. Kanazawa, M.: 1994, 'Weak vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences and Monotonicity Inference in a Dynamic Setting', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 109-158.
19. Karttunen, L.: 1968a, What Do Referential Indices Refer To, paper P-3854, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
20. Karttunen, L.: 1968b, What Makes Definite Noun Phrases Definite?, paper P-3871, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
21. Karttunen, L.: 1976, 'Discourse Referents', in J. D. McCawley (ed.), Notes from the Linguistic Underground. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 7, Academic Press, New York, pp. 363-85.
22. Landman, F.: 1986, Towards a Theory of Information, Foris, Dordrecht.
23. Lewis, D.: 1975, 'Adverbs of Quantification', in E. L. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 3-15.
24. Root, R.: 1986, The Semantics of Anaphora in Discourse, Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
25. Rooth, M.: 1987, 'NP Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics and Situation Semantics', in P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 237-69.
26. Schubert, L. K. and F. J. Pelletier: 1989, 'Generically Speaking, or, Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics', in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning II, Semantic Issues, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 193-268.
27. van Benthem, J.: 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
28. van den Berg, M. H.: 1994, 'A Direct Definition of Generalized Dynamic Quantifiers', in M. Stokhof and P. Dekker (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, pp. 121-40.
29. van Eijck, J. and de Vries, F.-J.: 1992, 'Dynamic Interpretation and Hoare Deduction', Journal of Logic, Language and Information 1, 1-44.
30. Veltman, F.: 1995, 'Defaults in Update Semantics', Journal of Philosophical Logic 24, In press.
31. Vermeulen, C. F.: 1993, 'Sequence Semantics for Dynamic Predicate Logic', Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2, 217-54.
32. Zeevat, H.: 1989, 'A Compositional Approach to Discourse Representation Theory', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 95-131.