The vagaries of paraphrase: A reply to Holton on the counting problem

Analysis

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 246-250

  Rumfitt, Ian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248772481     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/analys/56.4.246     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Davidson, D. 1967. Reply to Lemmon on tenses. In his Essays on Actions and Events, 123-24. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980
2. Davidson, D. 1969. On saying that. In his 1984, 93-108
3. Davidson, D. 1973. Radical interpretation. In his 1984, 125-39
4. Davidson, D. 1976. Reply to Foster. In his 1984, 171-79
5. Davidson, D. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press
6. Holton, R.J. 1996. Davidson, McFetridge, and the counting problem. Analysis 56: 46-50
7. McFetridge, I.G. 1976. Propositions and Davidson's account of indirect discourse. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76: 131-45
8. Rumfitt, I. 1993. Content and context: the paratactic theory revisited and revised. Mind 102: 429-54
9. Wiggins, D. 1992. Meaning, truth-conditions, proposition: Frege's doctrine of sense retrieved, resumed and redeployed in the light of certain recent criticisms. Dialectica 46: 61-90