Interrogative quantifiers within scope

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 255-310

  Pafel, Jürgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248760621     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: 15730549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005499211238     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alshawi, Hiyan (ed.): 1992, The Core Language Engine, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li: 1993, Syntax of Scope, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Åqvist, Lennart: 1965, A New Approach to the Logical Theory of Interrogatives, Filosofiska Föreningen, Uppsala. (Reprint: Tübingen: Narr 1975).
4. Beck, Sigrid: 1996, 'Quantified Structures as Barriers for LF Movement', Natural Language Semantics 4, 1-56.
5. Beghelli, Filippo: 1997, The Syntax of Distributivity and Pair-List Readings, in Szabolcsi (ed.), pp. 349-408,
6. Belnap, Nuel D., Jr.: 1963, An Analysis of Questions: Preliminary Report, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
7. Belnap, Nuel D., Jr.: 1982, 'Questions and Answers in Montague Grammar', in Stanley Peters and Esa Saarinen (eds.), Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 165-198.
8. Bennett, Michael: 1979, Questions in Montague Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.
9. Berman, Stephen: 1991, On the Semantics and Logical Form of wh-Clauses, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
10. Berman, Stephen: 1994, Wh-Clauses and Quantificational Variability, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 (Stuttgart/Tübingen), Bericht Nr. 61.
11. Brody, Michael: 1995, Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. Carlson, Gregory N.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
13. Chierchia, Gennaro: 1993, 'Questions with Quantifiers', Natural Language Semantics 1, 181-234.
14. Dayal [former: Srivastav], Veneeta: 1991, Wh Dependencies in Hindi and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
15. Engdahl, Elisabet: 1986, Constituent Questions. The Syntax and Semantics of Questions with Special Reference to Swedish, Reidel, Dordrecht.
16. Frege, Gottlob: 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Koeben, Breslau.
17. Frey, Werner: 1993, Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation, Akademie, Berlin.
18. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1982, 'Semantic Analysis of wh-complements', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 173-233.
19. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Academisch Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
20. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1989, 'Type-Shifting Rules and the Semantics of Interrogatives', in: Gennaro Chierchia and Barbara H. Partee and Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, Volume II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 21-68.
21. Haas-Spohn, Ulrike: 1989, 'Zur Interpretation der Einstellungszuschreibungen', in Gabriel Falkenberg (Hrsg.), Wissen, Wahrnehmen, Glauben: epistemische Ausdrücke und propositionale Einstellungen, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 49-94.
22. Heim, Irene: 1991, 'Artikel und Definitheit', in Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 487-535.
23. Heim, Irene: 1994, 'Interrogative Semantic's and Karttunen's Semantics for Know' in R. Buchalla and A. Mittwoch (eds.), IATL 1. The Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference and the Workshop on Discourse of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Academon, Jerusalem, pp. 128-144.
24. Higginbotham, James: 1991, 'Interrogatives I', in Lisa L. S. Cheng and Hamida Demirdash (eds.), More on wh-Movement, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 15, pp. 47-76.
25. Higginbotham, James: 1993, 'Interrogatives', in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 195-227.
26. Higginbotham, James: 1996, 'The Semantics of Questions', in Shalom Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 361-383.
27. Higginbotham, James and Robert May: 1981, 'Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing', The Linguistic Review 1, 41-80.
28. Hintikka, Jaakko: 1976, The Semantics of Questions and the Question of Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam. (Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 28, no. 4).
29. Höhle, Tilman N.: 1992, 'Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen', in: Joachim Jacobs (Hrsg.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 112-141.
30. Hoji, Hajime: 1986, 'Scope Interpretation in Japanese and its Theoretical Implications', in Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Format Linguistics, vol. 5, pp. 87-101.
31. Ioup, Georgette: 1975a, 'Some Universals for Quantifier Scope', in John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37-58.
32. Ioup, Georgette: 1975b, The Treatment of Quantifier Scope in a Transformational Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, University of New York.
33. Joo, Yanghee Shim: 1989, A Cross-Linguistic Approach to Quantification in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, Madison, University of Wisconsin.
34. Karttunen, Lauri: 1977, 'Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44.
35. Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters: 1980, 'Interrogative Quantifiers', in: Christian Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 181-205.
36. Katz, Jerrold and Paul M. Postal: 1964, An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Kim, Soowon: 1991, Chain Scope and Quantification Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.
38. Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, and Godehard Link: 1995, 'Genericity: An Introduction', in Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 1-124.
39. Kripke, Saul: 1979, 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', in: Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 6-27.
40. Kroch, Anthony S.: 1974, The Semantics of Scope in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
41. Kuno, Susumu: 1991, 'Remarks on Quantifier Scope', in Heizo Nakajima (ed.), Current English Linguistics in Japan, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 261-287.
42. Kurtzman, Howard S. and Maryellen C. MacDonald: 1993, 'Resolution of Quantifier Scope Ambiguities', Cognition 48, 243-279.
43. Lahiri, Utpal: 1991, Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed Them, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
44. Landman, Fred: 1989, 'Groups I', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559-606.
45. Lewis, David: 1991, Parts of Classes, Blackwell, Oxford.
46. Link, Godehard: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach', in Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarz and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation, de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 302-323.
47. Liu, Feng-hsi: 1990, Scope Dependency in English and Chinese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
48. May, Robert: 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
49. May, Robert: 1989, 'Interpreting Logical Form', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 387-435.
50. Pafel, Jürgen: 1991, 'Zum relativen Skopus von w- und Q-Phrasen (w/Q-Interaktion)', in Marga Reis and Inger Rosengren (Hrsg.), Fragesätze und Fragen, Niemeyer. Tübingen, pp. 145-173.
51. Pafel, Jürgen: 1993, 'Scope and Word Order', in Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow. Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Volume 1, de Gruyter, Berlin and New York. pp. 867-880.
52. Pafel, Jürgen: 1996a, 'Die syntaktische und semantische Struktur von "was für"-Phrasen', Linguistische Berichte 161, 37-67.
53. Pafel, Jürgen: 1996b, 'Absolute and Relative. On Scope in German wh-Sentences Including w ... w-Constructions', in Uli Lutz and Gereon Müller (eds.), Papers on wh-Scope Marking, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 (Stuttgart/Tübingen), Bericht Nr. 76, pp. 231-256.
54. Pafel, Jürgen: 1997, Skopus und logische Struktur. Studien zum Quantorenskopus im Deutschen, Habilitationsschrift, Universität Tübingen.
55. Reich, Ingo: 1997, Wer will wann wieviel wissen? Eine Untersuchung verschiedener Frage-Antwort-Bedingungen im Deutschen, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 (Stuttgart/Tübingen), Bericht Nr. 89.
56. Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London and Sydney.
57. Reis, Marga: 1992, 'The Category of Invariant 'alles' in wh-Clauses', in Rosemarie Tracy (ed.), Who Climbs the Grammar Tree? Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 465-492.
58. Schwarz, Bernhard: 1993, Gewisse Fälle eingebetteter Fragesätze, MA thesis, Universität Tübingen.
59. Schwarzschild, Roger: 1992, 'Types of Plural Individuals', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 641-675.
60. Sharvy, Richard: 1980, 'A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions', The Philosophical Review 89, 607-624.
61. Simons, Peter M.: 1987, Parts. A Study in Ontology, Clarendon, Oxford.
62. Swart, Henriëtte de: 1992, 'Intervention Effects, Monotonicity and Scope', in Chris Barker and David Dowty (eds.), Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Ohio State University May 1-3, 1992). The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics No. 40, pp. 387-406.
63. Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997, Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings, in Szabolcsi (ed.), pp. 311-347.
64. Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.): 1997, Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
65. VanLehn, Kurt A.: 1978, Determining the Scope of English Quantifiers, Technical Report, Artifical Intelligence Laboratory MIT.
66. Zimmermann, Thomas Ede: 1993, 'On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs', Natural Language Semantics 1, 149-179.