Frequency spectra within word-length classes

Journal of Quantitative Linguistics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 224-231

  Leopold, Edda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248748031     PISSN: 09296174     EISSN: 17445035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09296179808590130     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Balasubrahmanyan, V.K., & Naranan, S. (1996). Quantitative linguistics and complex system studies. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 3, 177-224.
2. Chitashvili, R.Ja., & Baayen, H. (1993). Word frequency distributions. In G. Altmann & L. Hřebíček (Eds.), Quantitative text analysis (pp. 46-135). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
3. Goel, N.S., & Richter-Dyn, N. (1974). Stochastic models in biology. New York: Academic Press.
4. Guiter, H. (1974). Les relations frequence - longueur - sens des mots (Langues Romanes et Anglais) (pp. 373-381). XIV congresso internazionale di linguistica filologia romanza. Napoli: Atti.
5. Hammerl, R. (1991). Untersuchungen zur Struktur der Lexik: Aufbau eines lexikalischen Basismodells. WVT: Trier.
6. Köhler, R. (1986). Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik. (= QL Vol. 31). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
7. Leopold, E. (1992a). Anpassungsdynamik sprachlicher Systeme. In S. Beckmann & S. Frilling (Eds.), Satz - Text - Diskurs. Akten des 27. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Münster 1992, Vol. 1 (pp. 197-202). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
8. Leopold, E. (1992b, September) Adaptation processes in language systems. Paper held on the "Conference on Linguistic Synergetics" (COLISYN) in Moscow.
9. Leopold, E. (forthcoming). Stochastische Modellierung von lexikalischen Evolutionsprozessen.
10. Mandelbrot, B. (1953). An information theory of the statistical structure of language. In W. Jackson (Ed.), Communication theory (pp. 503-512). New York: Academic Press.
11. Naranan, S., & Balasubrahmanyan, V.K. (1992). Information theoretic models in statistical linguistics - Part I: A model for word frequencies. Current Science, 63, 261-269.
12. Orlov, Ju.K. (1982). Linguostatistik: Aufstellung von Sprachnormen oder Analyse des Redeprozesses? (Die Antinomie 'Sprache - Rede' in der statistischen Linguistik). In Ju.K. Orlov, M.G. Boroda & I.S. Nadarejšili (Eds.), Sprache, Text, Kunst. Quantitative Analysen (pp. 1-55). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
13. Prün, C. (forthcoming). The linguistic hypotheses of G.K. Zipf.
14. Popper, K.R. (1934). Logik der Forschung. Wien: Springer.
15. Rapoport, A. (1982). Zipf's law re-visited. In H. Guiter & H. Arapov (Eds.), Studies on Zipf's laws (pp. 1-28). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
16. Saukkonen, P. (1982). Oulun korpus. 1960-luvun suomen yleiskielen tutkimusmateriaali; OYSSKLT 1.
17. Swadesh, M. (1955). Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics,21, 121-137.
18. Zipf, G.K. (1932). Selected studies of the principle of relative frequency in language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Zipf, G.K. (1935). The psychobiology of language. An introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. (2nd edition: Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1968)
20. Zipf, G.K. (1937). Statistical methods in dynamic philology (Reply to M. Joos). Language, 132, 60-70.
21. Zipf, G.K. (1940). On the economical arrangement of tools, the harmonic series and the properties of space. Psychological Record, 4, 147-148.
22. Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley. (Reprint: New York: Hafner, 1972)
23. Zörnig, P., Köhler, R., & Brinkmöller, R. (1990). Differential equation models for the oscillation of the word length as a function of the frequency. In R. Hammerl (Ed.), Glottometrika 12 (pp. 1-24). Bochum: Brockmeyer.