A multifactorial analysis of syntactic variation: Particle movement revisited

Journal of Quantitative Linguistics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 33-50

  Gries, Stefan T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248738754     PISSN: 09296174     EISSN: 17445035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/jqul.8.1.33.4092     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner & L.R. Gleitman (Eds.), Language Acquisition: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the competition model. In E. Bates & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Berg, T. (1998). Linguistic structure and change: An explanation from language processing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bortz, J. (1999). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. 5. Ausgabe. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
6. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., & Stone, C.J. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software.
7. Chen, P. (1986). Discourse and particle movement in English. Studies in Language, 10, 79-95.
8. Den Kikken, M. (1992). Particles. Holland Institute of Linguistics Dissertations. The Hague: Holland Acad. Graphics.
9. Den Dikken, M. (1995). Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Fraser, B. (1974). The phrasal verb in English, by Dwight Bolinger. Language, 50, 568-575.
11. Fraser, B. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic Press.
12. Givón, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30, 5-55.
13. Gries, S.T. (1999). Particle placement: A cognitive and functional account. Cognitive Linguistics, 10, 105-146.
14. Gries, S.T. (2000). Towards multifactorial analyses of syntactic variation: The case of particle placement. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hamburg, Faculty of Language Sciences.
15. Hawkins, J.A. (1994). A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Hawkins, J.A. (2000). The relative ordering of prepositional phrases in english: Going beyond manner - place - time. Language Variation and Change, 11, 231-266.
17. Jespersen, O. (1928). A modern English grammar on historical principles. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
18. Kruisinga, E., & Erades, P.A. (1953). An English Grammar. Vol. I. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.
19. Labov, W. (1975). Empirical foundations of linguistic theory. In R. Austerlitz (Ed.), The Scope of American Linguistics (pp. 77-133). Lisse: The Peter de Ridder Press.
20. Prince, E.F. (1991). On functional explanation in lingistics and the origins of language. Language and Communication, 11, 79-82.
21. Rohdenburg, G. (1996). Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 149-182.
22. Rohrbacher, B. (1994). English main verbs move never. The Penn Review of Linguistics, 18, 145-159.
23. Schütze, C.T. (1996). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgements and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Sweet, H.A. (1892). A new English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25. Winer, B.J., Brown, D.R., & Michels, K.M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26. Yeagle, R. (1983). The syntax and semantics of English verb-particle constructions with off: A space grammar analysis. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.