On the very idea of a science forming faculty

Dialectica

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 125-151

  Collins, John ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248737308     PISSN: 00122017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2002.tb00235.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. CAREY, S. and SPELKE, 1994, "Domain-specific Knowledge and Conceptual. Change." In L. Hirschfeld and S. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (pp. 169-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. CHOMSKY, N., 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. CHOMSKY, N., 1968/72, Language and Mind (extended edition). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
4. CHOMSKY, N., 1971, Problems of Knowledge and Freedom: The Russell Lectures. New York: Pantheon.
5. CHOMSKY, N., 1975a, The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
6. CHOMSKY, N., 1975b, Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon.
7. CHOMSKY, N., 1979, Language and Responsibility: Based on Conversations with Mitsou Ronat. New York: Pantheon.
8. CHOMSKY, N., 1980, Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. CHOMSKY, N., 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Fori s
10. CHOMSKY, N., 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. Westport: Praeger.
11. CHOMSKY, N., 1988, Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. CHOMSKY, N., 1991a, "Linguistics and Adjacent Fields: A personal View." In A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn (pp.3-25). Oxford: Blackwell.
13. CHOMSKY, N., 1991b, "Linguistics and Cognitive Science: Problems and Mysteries." In A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn (pp. 26-53). Oxford: Blackwell.
14. CHOMSKY, N., 1993, Language and Thought. London: Moyer Bell
15. CHOMSKY, N., 1995, The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. CHOMSKY, N, 2000a, New Horizons in the Study of language and Mind, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. CHOMSKY, N., 2000b, The Architecture of Language. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18. CHURCHLAND, P., 1989, A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. CLARK, A., 1996, Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. COLLINS, J., 2000, "Logical Form, Theory of Mind, and Eliminativism." Philosophical Psychology, 13, pp. 465-490.
21. DENNETT, D., 1995, Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. London: Penguin.
22. DEPEW, D. and WEBER, B., 1995, Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. FODOR, J., 1975, The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. FODOR, J., 1981, "The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy." In Representations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science (pp. 257-316). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
25. FODOR, J., 1983, The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. FODOR, J., 1987, "Modules, Frames, Fridgeons, Sleeping Dogs, and the Music of the Spheres." In J. Garfield (ed.), Modularity in Knowledge Representation and Natural-Language Understanding (pp. 25-36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. FODOR, J., 2000, The Mind, Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. GOODMAN, N., 1954/83, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast (fourth edition). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. GOPNIK, A. and MELTZOFF, A., 1997, Words, Thoughts, and Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. GOPNIK, A. and WELLMAN, H., 1994, "The Theory Theory." In L. Hirscheld and S. Gelman, (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture (pp. 257-93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. HARMAN, G., 1994, "Simplicity as a Practical Criterion for Deciding what Hypotheses to Take Seriously." In D. Stalker (ed.), Gruel The, New Riddle of Induction (pp. 153-171). La Salle: Open. Court.
32. KARMILOFF-SMITH, A., 1992, Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. KEIL, F., 1989, Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. LESLIE, A., 2000, "How to Acquire a Representational Theory of Mind." In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. MAYR, E., 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. MCGINN, C., 1991, The Problem of Consciousness. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
37. MCGINN, C., 1993, Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. NAGEL, T., 1986, The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford. University Press.
39. NAGEL, T., 1995, Other Minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. PIATTELLI-PALMARRNI, M. (ed.), 1980, Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. PINKER, S., 1997, How the Mind Works. London: Penguin.
42. PUTNAM., H., 1981, Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. PUTNAM, H., 1983, "Forward." In Goodman. (1954/83): pp. vii-xvi.
44. PUTNAM, H., 1988, Representation and Reality. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
45. PUTNAM, H., 1992, Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46. SEGAL, G., 1996, "The Modularity of Theory of Mind." In P. Carruthers and P. Smith (eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind (pp. 141-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. SPERBER, D., PREMACK, J., and PREMACK, A. (eds.), 1995, Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate. Oxford: Clarendon Press.