Semantic shifts in argumentative processes: A step beyond the 'fallacy of equivocation'

Argumentation

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 17-30

  Deppermann, Arnulf ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248733220     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1007838727096     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Aristotle: 1955, On Sophistical Refutations, Heinemann, London.
2. Attardo, S.: 1994, Linguistic Theories of Humour, de Gruyter, New York.
3. Bilmes, J.: 1991, 'Toward a Theory of Argument in Conversation: The Preference for Disagreement', in F. van Eemeren and R. Grootendorst (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation. Vol 1A, SICSAT, Amsterdam, pp. 462-469.
4. Deppermann, A.: 1997, Glaubwürdigkeit im Konflikt. Rhetorische Techniken in Streitgesprächen, Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
5. Deppermann, A.: 1999, Gespräche analysieren, Leske + Budrich, Opladen.
6. Heritage, J.: 1995, 'Conversation Analysis: Methodological Aspects', in U.M. Quasthoff (ed.), Aspects of Oral Communication, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 395-418.
7. Nothdurft, W.: 1996, 'Schlüsselwörter. Zur rhetorischen Herstellung von Wirklichkeit', in W. Kallmeyer (ed.), Gesprächsrhetorik. Rhetorische Verfahren in Gesprächsprozessen, Narr, Tübingen, pp. 351-418.
8. Pomerantz, A.: 1984, 'Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 57-101.
9. Powers, L.H.: 1995, 'Equivocation', in H.V. Hansen and R.C. Pinto (eds.), Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Pennsylvania State University, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 287-301.
10. Spranz-Fogasy, T. and T. Fleischmann: 1993, 'Types of Dispute Courses in Family Interaction', Argumentation 7, 221-235.
11. Swinney, D.A.: 1979, 'Lexical Access During Sentence Comprehension: (Re)consideration of Context Effects', Journal of Verbal learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 654-660.
12. Walton, D.N.: 1996, Fallacies Arising from Ambiguity, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
13. Woods, J. and D.N. Walton: 1989, 'Equivocation and Practical Logic', in J. Woods and D.N. Walton (eds.), Fallacies. Selected Papers 1972-1982, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 195-207.