Concept mapping for rater training

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 219-233

  Ellis, Rod ^a   Johnson, Karen E ^b   Papajohn, Dean ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248733204     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3588333     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chalhoub-Deville, M. (1995). Deriving oral assessment scales across different tests and rater groups. Language Testing, 12, 16-33.
2. Douglas, D. (1994). Quantity and quality in speaking test performance. Language Testing, 11, 125-144.
3. Douglas, D., & Smith, J. (1997). Theoretical underpinnings of the Test of Spoken English Revision Project (TOEFL Monograph Series No. 9) Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
4. Educational Testing Service. (1996). Speaking Proficiency English Assessment Kit rater training guide. Princeton, NJ: Author
5. McIntyre, M., & James, L. (1995). The inconsistency with which raters weight and combine information across targets. Human Performance, 8, 95-108.
6. McNamara, T. F. (1990). Item response theory and the validation of an ESP test for health professionals. Language Testing, 7, 52-76.
7. McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. New York: Longman.
8. Merion, B. E. (1998, March). Rating oral proficiency tests: A triangulated study of rater thought processes. Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium, Monterey, CA.
9. Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability? Educational Researcher, 23(2), 5-12.
10. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Papajohn, D. (1997, November). The standard setting process for the new Test of Spoken English: A university case study. Paper presented at the Sixth National Conference on the Education and Employment of Graduate Teaching Assistants, Minneapolis, MN.
12. Papajohn, D. (1998). Reviewing standard setting for the new Test of Spoken English. The Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 6(1), 45-52.
13. Papajohn D., Alsberg, J., Bair, B., & Willenborg, B. (in press). An ESP program for international teaching assistants. In T. Orr (Ed.), English for specific purposes (Case Studies in TESOL Practice series). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
14. Primo, M., & Shavelson, R. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 569-600.
15. Reed, D. J., & Cohen, A. D. (2001). Revisiting raters and ratings in oral language assessment. In C. Elder et al. (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honour of Alan Davies (Studies in Language Testing No. 11, pp. 82-96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Turner, C. E., & Upshur, J. A. (2002). Rating scales derived from student samples: Effects of the scale maker and the student sample on scale content and student scores. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 49-70.
17. Weigle, S. C. (1994). Effects of training on raters of ESL compositions. Language Testing, 11, 197-223.
18. Wesley, W. G., & Wesley, B. A. (1990, October). Concept mapping: A brief introduction. The Teaching Professor, 3.
19. Wilson, V. A. (1998, August/September). Concept maps can increase understanding for students and teachers. The Teaching Professor, 8.